Reality Hurts

A Blog Response

Recently on another blog: The Right Side of Life posted the following;   Rep. Deal Wants Obama’s Birth Certificate; Let the Blowback Begin!

Apparently Rep. Deal knew he was going to stir up quite the proverbial hornet’s nest by seriously suggesting that he was going to ask the President to see his birth certificate. So, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (h/t PeachPundit), the castigations are now beginning.

As you read through what I post from the article, below, I’m going to interject my own commentary into what the included public figures say, because I think most of them are seriously full of it; the idea that somehow someone is considered to be, essentially, other than rational for daring to question the President is, itself, asinine:

“I have looked at the documentation that is publicly available and it leaves many things to be desired,” Deal said in an interview Friday.

Deal’s statement came a day after he noted in an online chat that he would join other U.S. House members in writing the president and asking that he release a copy of his birth certificate.

a poster that goes by siseduermapierdra posted again the flawed Wong Kim Ark decision in his rantinmgs. I posted the follwing reply. Posted here for you all to read.

I hate to break the news to you, but I have been saying the following LONG before Leo.

Quote; Barack Obama has admitted that he is a British subject [CITIZEN] at birth, was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 [JURISDICTION] and followed the condition of his father, a foreign national from Kenya [ALLEGIANCE] to the British Crown.

The 14th Amendment and Title 8 state that NOT only being born in country, but that you have to have the Jurisdiction.

You attempt to solve a math problem with only half the equation, it does not work.

Citizenship + Jurisdiction + Allegiance = Natural Born Citizen

Even SR511 that allowed McCain, was flawed as it clearly stated the requirements for NBC status.

 Senate Resolutions is a resolution is often used to express the body’s approval or disapproval of something which they cannot otherwise vote on, due to the matter being handled by another jurisdiction, or being protected by a constitution.

Again, I will note: being protected by a constitution.
What Constitution are they refering to that protects the NBC requirement.

“”"Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it…”"”

Note BORN TO TWO (2) US CITIZEN Parents, but OUTSIDE the Country.
Which we know McCain was NOT born in a US Military hospital on base, as there WAS no hospital on base.

Please state who are Barack Obama TWO (2) US Citizen parents?

Now, lets take a look at John Bingham, ‘author’ of the 14th Amendment of which you attempt to use a flawed decision of KWA.

I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen -Rep. John Bingham, framer of the 14th Amendment, before The US House of Representatives ((Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291, March 9, 1866 ) http://grou.ps/zapem/blogs/3787

Note: that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty.

Barack Obama has admitted that he is a British subject [CITIZEN] at birth, was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 [JURISDICTION] and followed the condition of his father, a foreign national from Kenya [ALLEGIANCE] to the British Crown.

I believe Obama fails, based on John Bingham

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_Z…

Now Justice Waite;
it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

Again born in country to parents who are citizens

Please state the US Parent(s) of Barack Obama, both of them.
Oh, that’s right his father was a foreign national, or ‘as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.’

“My assumption and my understanding is that if you are born of American parents, you are naturally a natural-born American citizen,” Chertoff replied.
“That is mine, too,” said Leahy
-Homeland Security SecretaryMichael Chertoff and Senator Patrick Leahy, (April 03, 2008) http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html

Again, please provide the names of both the United States citizen Parent(s) of Barack Obama.

that’s right, his father was a foreign national. He was from a foreign country.

Since you like to use KWA, here is another
“In Minor v. Happersett, Chief Justice Waite, when construing, in behalf of the court, the very provision of the fourteenth amendment now in question, said: ‘The constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.’ And he proceeded to resort to the common law as an aid in the construction of this provision.”
-Justice Grey, in US v Wong Kim Ark (1898) http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=1…

Where is this other resort that the Supreme Court and other cases used to determine.

E. Vattel, the Law of Nations.

 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

It’s hard for Obama supporters to face facts.

Natural Born Citizen- Visual Guide

Here is the Natural Born Citizen. explained visually.

The COLB Playing Card

I have been keeping track of the COLB’s that have been posted on the internet. The lastest entry is the “Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate”. Here is a screen shot of the main page [below] it has embedded images of the Hawaiian and kenyan Templates that were used to create the forgeries.

The Obama COLB’s posted on “FTS” – Fight the Smears and FactCheck were created with the Hawaiian template [embedded] the date stamp Jun 6 – 2007 is clearly visible on the template and the several anomolies, such as the dots that others have mentioned are also visible.

The Kenyan Template is also embedded.

The Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate also known as the eBay Certificate is not in a singular image, but rather several screenshots. First impression on this one was it was a xeroxed copy of a Hospital Birth Certificate that would have been given to Obama’s parents. Hence the presence of the footprint. This xeroxed copy under higher contract would have resulted in the extra dark lettering and lack of finer details in the footprint itself. The additional information, such as the attending Doctor made this one a bit more convincing. One detail that was still lacking is Barack Obama Sr age, still only refered to as ‘25′ with no specific date. This was one clue that initially dropped the believability factor. Without another similar document from the same era and institution, it would be hard to authenticate this one.

However, one thing that all these COLB’s have in common is the ease that a Birth Certification or Certificate can be forged and presented as a real document. Leading to what others have refered to as a ‘breeder’ document.  Where a false or forged Birth Certificate can be used to generate additional documents. Illegal’s have been using this tactis for many years.  Only now has the industry looked at it, and even FoxNews has reported on it.

Again, and as I will state making all the more important for the State of Hawaii to release whatever ‘record’ they have on file for Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Obama aka Barry Dunham aka ?

Here is a word doc with the blank templates. The COLB Playing Card

Here is a link to the full spreadsheet:

View this document on Scribd

An African Original

Senate Resolution 511 and what it really means

Most people looking into the eligibility issue concerning Barack Obama aka Barrack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama, [sounds more like a wanted posted with all these alias’s], have seen SR511. Senate Resolution 511 is in terms the defining moment when the Senate gave its approval for one of their own, to circumvent the laws of this nation.

Let’s look at  SR511 and it’s interpretation of the Presidential eligibility

 Here is the Resolution text.

 Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

 Now, let us take this simple and explore its hidden meaning.

 Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

They apparently have read the Constitution and have zeroed in on one clause that no law or legislative body has the right to amend.

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

 The term ‘natural born citizen’ is not defined, however other rulings by the Supreme Court, Congress, and other writings from such as John Bingham, do define what a ‘natural born citizen’ is. For sake of space I will only quote the following.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_Z…

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

 So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they claimed to have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

 So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

 It sounds nice, but means nothing? Some fluff but again means nothing.

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

 Whom are they referring to, that was born ‘outside’ the United States and who deemed them eligible?

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

So the Senate gave by law, what nature failed to do. Would that not be a ‘naturalized’ citizenship?

So the Senate deemed that two (2) American or US Citizen parents was an essential to the definition of a ‘natural born citizen’ that was not defined in the Constitution. So how did they deem that the issue was being born outside the jurisdiction of the United States if they had no definition or requirements of what ‘constituted’ a ‘natural born citizen?’ It seems like they know the definition, but are hoping the American public doesn’t. There is but one defintion that a ‘natural born citizen’ has to have citizen parents and being born in country and that is Vattel’s Law of Nations.

As I refered to SR 511. SR511 is a non-binding, non-lawful understanding, that can not be held as a LAW. Being such, a non-binding resolution is a written motion adopted by a deliberative body that cannot progress into a law. The substance of the resolution can be anything that can normally be proposed as a motion.This type of resolution is often used to express the body’s approval or disapproval of something which they cannot otherwise vote on, due to the matter being handled by another jurisdiction, or being protected by a constitution.

Again, I will note: being protected by a constitution.

“Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.”

The reason I make this point is that for the chance that John Mccain would have actually won the 2008 Presidential election. The issue of his eligibility not only would have been brought up, but would have stated congressional hearings, the likes of Watergate all over again. The Congress would have in no time instituted articles of impeachment and the motion would have been approved. Then the Senate would have their chance to remove John McCain, however since they already have voted with their ‘Gentlemen’s Agreement’, regardless how the vote went. A non-binding, non-lawful resolution that trumps the United States Constitution could be waved in front of the American public, and John McCain, could go back in the corner, stick his thumb in his pie, and exclaim “Oh, what a good boy am I.”

Senate Resolution 511, was an attempt to circumvent the United States Constitution, and amend the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Clause of which there has NEVER been an amendment or change too.

More then just a non-binding resolution, SR511 defined John McCain’s eligibility based on  being born of US Parents [NOTE the plural] but outside the country. Therefore the only alternative based on THEIR wording is ‘born in country’. They did not change the requirement of two (2) US parents.

Where is there a definition as to a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ based on parents [again plural] and born in country? Vattel’s Law of Nations.

Why if John McCain was held to these requirements, was Barack Obama not held of being born of US Parents [plural] and in the United States. 

Barack Obama has admitted that not only was his father a foreign national, but that he himself was a British Subject at birth. A British Subject is a foreign national and how can a foreign national be a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution?

Obama’s Birth Certificate Forgery Proven

I have been looking into the Obama Birth Certificate.  Here’s what can be said.

Currently there are two different Birth Certificates. One off Obama’s web-site and the other on FactCheck. Here is the one on His web-site.

Notice that it does not have three items, Date stamp, signiture, or seal. The seal is embossed. Hence would clearly be visible.

It COULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII.

Even if it was sent in a flat box, it is still missing the requied items, from the State. Nor would the Sate release the document electronically as some Obama supporters have suggested.

If the BC on his website was released by any official State Dept, it would have been notorized with the embossed SEAL, signed, and dated before it was released to ANYBODY. Including Obama himself.
If it was printed out by the Dept of Health via computer, it would have to have checked, verified, and Sealed, dated, and signed, before it was released to ANYBODY. Precaution to ANY official document.

The dept official stated that it should have the seal and date. Janice Okubo.

No let’s go to the FactCheck Birth Certificate.

Although this looks like a “Certified” Birth Certificate it is a forgery.  It does appers to have the date stamp, and signiture, however the SEAL is the give away to forgery.

Here is an actual Hawaii Birth Certificate;

Notice the embossed SEAL. Now we will look at the seal. We cropped the seal, flipped it, increased the contrast and look what we have. Below is the cropped/enlarged SEAL off a known good Hawaii Birth Certifcate.

Clearly able to read the following: “Department of Health” and “State of Hawaii”

[The above SEAL is NOT on Obama's]

Now lets do the same with the embossed Sael off the FactCheck Birth certificatem, and see what we get.

again, another shot

Whats that, NO lettering stating where it was “Certified” from:

There IS NO lettering in the embossed SEAL.  There is NO “Department of Health” and “State of Hawaii” Some have e-mailed me claiming they can see the lettering… Sorry folks, the State of Hawaii confirmed that it is NOT their seal used. You can clearly see the difference between the two, and one is a fake seal. The fake seal is on Obama’s.

Below is a side by side comparison between the two seals. For all the Obama supporters out there who claim they see things on the seal that is not there. The one on the left is from an actual Hawaiian Birth Certificate and the one on the right is from the Obama Birth Certificate from FactCheck. OK, here it is again, the one on the left is REAL, the one on the right is Obama’s. Sorry if you tell the difference between right and left.

Here is an e-mail that I recieved from the State of Hawaii.

Do you understand what it says.  The official State seal used by the Department of Health, has lettering embedded into the seal.

Obama’s does not have any lettering and is not an official seal from the State of Hawaii.

It’s a forgery.  Obama can’t porduce a valid Birth Certificate, nor can he prove Natural Born Citizenship.

Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetor when he moved to Indonesia and the following is his “Official” registration at school in Indonesia.

Notice the name: Barry Soetoro Nationality: Indonesian Religion: Muslim

There it is folks. Obama busted!

I have been swamped with people saying that comparing Birth Certificates from two different states is not a valid comparison.  Here is an official US Guide for Birth certificates. There are standards for Birth Certificates, and the information contained therein.  The short form is limited in data, hence the long form or “Vault” copy prefered.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/techap99.pdf

 

 

 

Standard certificate of live birth

The U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth, issued by the Public Health Service, has served for many years as the principal means of attaining uniformity in the content of the documents used to collect information on births in the United States. It has been modified in each State to the extent required by the particular State’s needs or by special provisions of the State’s vital statistics law. However, most State certificates conform closely in content to the standard certificate.

The first standard certificate of birth was developed in 1900. Since then, it has been revised periodically by the national vital statistics agency through consultation with State health officers and registrars; Federal agencies concerned with vital statistics; national, State, and county medical societies; and others working in public health, social welfare, demography, and insurance. This procedure has assured careful evaluation of each item for its current and future usefulness for legal, medical, demographic, and research purposes. New items have been added when necessary, and old items have been modified to ensure better reporting or, in some cases, dropped when their usefulness appeared to be limited.

1989 revision

 

–Effective January 1, 1989, a revised U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth (figure 4-A) replaced the 1978 revision. This revision provided a wide variety of new information on maternal and infant health characteristics, representing a significant departure from previous versions in both content and format. The most significant format change was the use of check boxes to obtain detailed medical and health information about the mother and child. It has been demonstrated that this format produces higher quality and more complete information than do open-ended items.

 

 

Anyone with Windows can do this.

Download the following image of the COLB [Forgery] and right click for the menu and the go to Properties. The go to “Summary” and then “Advanced”. Here you will see that the COLB was “CREATED” with Adobe Photoshop CS3 on a Macintosh.

Download the large image at http://defendourfreedoms.org/COLB.jpg

Obama’s COLB is forged

The Hawaiian COLB contains security features that some might be be aware of. The lines on the paper are designed to prevent forgery and fraud. I will post several images of real Hawaiian Birth Certifications and Obama’s which can be seen as a forgery and a fake.

Here we have an actual Hawaiian Birth Certification.

I have adjusted the contrast and brightness and flipped the image to be able to read the SEAL and Date

Notice the impression of the embossed SEAL and Date stamp.

Here is another Hawaiian BC found on the internet

This one we will use to again, compare the Obama forgery. Notice that the SEAL’s are in the same general area on both.

Now here is the Obama “COLB” posted on “Fight the Smears”

Notice that there is NO indications of a date stamp, or embossed SEAL.

We will now compare the area were the SEAL should be. Here is the SEAL for the 1990 COLB above. It has been cropped tp cover the bottom righthand section. We will now, adjust the contract and brightness to the area

Notice the security line [vertical and horizontal] are broken where the SEAL is embossed. Below is a close-up of the embossed SEAL area.

again, clearly showing the security lines broken, due to the SEAL. Here is the section and area used

Now here is the same bottom righthand section on the Obama “COLB”.

Notice there are NO lines broken or anything indicating that a stamp or SEAL was ever applied to the document. Here is a comparison of the same areas togather.

This is proof that the “COLB” posted on Fight the Smears is a computer generated forgery that could in no way be an Official document from the State of Hawaii, as they could not ever release a COLB without the SEAL or Date Stamp.

Obama and his campaign fabricated a forged document.

Here is what a REAL Hawaiian Long Form Birth certificate looks like.

and another Long Form

Notice the following the 1962 Long Form has the same security lines and you can see the embossed seal.

Even the 1963 Long Form has the same security lines.

Reverse showing the back

Even the 1962 Long Form that was taken by hand and NOT scanned can you see the embossed seal. WHY CAN”T YOU SEE IT ON Obama’s? Because it’s FAKE!

Obama supporter responds

I decided to post the latest response from an Obama supporter. This guy is over the top.  Mis-information, lies, et.

Here is his post.

Author : Actual Facts (IP: 66.232.118.237 , 66.232.118.237)
E-mail : you.are@homosexual.net
URL    :
Whois  : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=66.232.118.237
Comment:
“Notice that there is NO indications of a date stamp”

Really? You can’t see a backwards JUN – 6 2007?

Look at the actual photos of the COLB on Factcheck. You see that stamp and seal. In fact the HI state registar Alvin Onaka was shown the scan and noticed a part of the seal showing through before Factcheck published photos.

“When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.”

If you adjust your monitor brightness/contrast you may see it. Or use Photoshop and the high quality scan Politifact or KOS posted and try contrast around +80 and brightness around -50 you detect part of it right above date stamp.

If the expert who issued it sees it how can anyone have a problem with it? I know they can’t win in court.

Now lets look at the facts. He is resorting to the “FactCheck” COLB, where as although it does an embossed seal. It is NOT an official State of Hawaii Department of Health Seal. If you look at the Seal, the words “State of Hawaii” and Department of Health” are missing. As per the State of Hawaii’s Vital Records, in the following e-mail. The lettering would be there. It is NOTon the FactCheck COLB.  Here is the e-mail from Hawaii.

The official at the State of Hawaii, did NOT confirm the COLB is authentic. This is an Obama tactic, where they say that Hawaii has confirmed the COLB.

Fact:  Hawaiian officials have confirmed they have a birth certificate on file for Obama, but it cannot be released without his permission, and they have not revealed the information it contains.

Also please not the e-mail the poster,  the Obama supporters are showing their true colors.

The fact that Obama used a forged document to gain employment as an illegal alien is becoming clear.  The existance of multiple COLB’s is fact.

Here is another reply.

Author : hey (IP: 67.159.44.138 , .)

E-mail : strange@stuff.orgURL :

Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=67.159.44.138

Comment: Notice the name: Barry Soetoro Nationality: Indonesian Religion: Muslim Notice the place of birth. Honolulu Game over.

Notice how they will use the Indonesian School registration as proof of born in Hawaii, but totally disregard the same for the Nationality, listed as Indonesian. Proof of Obama’s Real name Barry Soetoro Citizenship- Indonesian. Religion – Muslim. They will also use the FactCheck forgey as proof of an embossed Seal on the “second” COLB, and disregard the fact that the origional posted on Fight the Smears, does not have one. Therfore it could never have been released by the State of Hawaii.

So who is he? Obama and his supporters can’t have it both ways

An Obama supporter responded to the fake COLB with the information contained in the Indonesian School registration. [see image below].

Here is his message;

Author : hey (IP: 67.159.44.138 , .)

E-mail : strange@stuff.org

URL :Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=67.159.44.138

Comment: Notice the name: Barry Soetoro Nationality: Indonesian Religion: Muslim Notice the place of birth. Honolulu Game over.

I mentioned this below and will repeat here again.

Notice how they will use the Indonesian School registration as proof of born in Hawaii, but totally disregard the same for the Nationality, listed as Indonesian. Proof of Obama’s Real name Barry Soetoro Citizenship- Indonesian. Religion – Muslim. They will also use the FactCheck forgey as proof of an embossed Seal on the “second” COLB, and disregard the fact that the origional posted on Fight the Smears, does not have one. Therfore it could never have been released by the State of Hawaii.

So who is the person in the White House.

If he is Barack Obama, he has admitted being a British citizen at birth.  From his own web-site,

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

British at birth, is NOT “Natural Born” and disqualifies Obama.

If the person in the White House is Barry Soetoro, then the Indonesian school registration is proof of Indonesian citizenship, and not American, again, disqualifing Obama. Not only that, but the COLB produced is for another individual Barack Obama. However Barach Obama has stated that he has NO other name, or gone by any other name. [see image below]

If Obama did go by Barry Soetoro, then he is also guilty of re-entering the US and not going through the US Customs and Naturalization process. Thereby again becoming a “Naturalized” citizen, and again in no way can be “Natural Born”.

Obama and his supporters can’t have it both ways. Either he is Barack Obama born in Hawaii with a foreign father and admitted British at birth,  or he is Barry Soetoro who entered the US without going through the US Customs and Naturalization process and is an illegal alien.

Certificate Security

State and Fereral Documents have embedded security features and these are designed to make if difficult to forge and duplicate.

Here are two examples. The first is the Obama marriage certificate. I did a search and was able to locate it. A used the same method used on the forged Obama COLB, adjusting the brightness and contrast to bring out the security featues. In the marriage certificate the words “VOID” are clearly visible, when using this method. This image has three different degrees of adjustment and I pasted the sections onto the origional as so you could see that they are real.

Here is my Son’s COLB issued in 2006 from the State of Washington. Using the same method as above again the words “VOID” are clearly visible. However these features are NOT clearly seen just by looking at the documents.

Remember Obama’s COLB is showing No embossed Seal. It is a computer generated forgery. The Security lines are discussed below, showing NO breakage from any stamp or SEAL being applied.

Thomas Jefferson – Natural Born Citizen

In Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, Volume 21, Pages 250-251 ( http://tinyurl.com/8zvmgy ), we see notes from Thomas Jefferson from December 1783.

The first question is

“Qu. 1. Can an American citizen, adult, now inherit lands in England?”

to which Thomas Jefferson begins his answer with

“Natural subjects can inherit–Aliens cannot.
There is no middle character–every man must be the one or the other of these.”

(In other words, dual nationality did not exist. Citizenship was singular.)

Thomas Jefferson also wrote this in his answer:

“An alien is the subject or citizen of a foreign power.
The treaty of peace acknowleges we are no longer to owe allegiance to the king of G.B. It acknowleges us no longer as Natural subjects then.
It makes us citizens of independent states; it makes us aliens then.”

(So, in the context of these notes, an “alien” is an American citizen and not a British subject.)

The second question is

“Qu.2. The father a British subject; the son in America, adult, and within the description of an American citizen, according to their laws. Can the son inherit?”

and Thomas Jefferson answers, before dealing with an objection, 
“He owes allegiance to the states. He is an alien then and cannot inherit.”

(For the adult “alien” citizen son, the state of the British father does not descend to him, neither with respect to nationality/allegiance nor with respect to property.)

The third question is
“Qu. 3. The father a British subject. The son as in Qu. 2. but an infant. Can he inherit?”

Thomas Jefferson’s answer:

“1st. by the Common law.
We have seen before that the state of the father does not draw to it as an accessory that of the son where he is an adult.  But by the common law.”

(Thomas Jefferson wrote that there was “no middle character” between a “natural subject” and an “alien”. Further, he called the ADULT AMERICAN CITIZEN son of the British subject an ALIEN who could not inherit from the British father. So, it stands to reason that Thomas Jefferson is calling the MINOR son of the British subject a NATURAL SUBJECT by the common law in following the state of the father, even though the minor son is in America following the Treaty of Paris, called the “treaty of peace” in Thomas Jefferson’s answer to Question 1.)

“An alien is the subject or citizen of a foreign power.
The treaty of peace acknowleges we are no longer to owe allegiance to the king of G.B. It acknowleges us no longer as Natural subjects then.
It makes us citizens of independent states; it makes us aliens then.”

Here is the bomb- 
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Therefore Obama is an alien of the United States and an Alien is not, can not, nor EVER be a “Natural Born Citizen”

Natural Born Citizen legally defined

There has been much debate as to whether the term “Natural Born Citizen” has ever been legally defined or will some court have to finally define it, such as the Supreme Court of the United States.  The term “Natural Born Citizen” is a requirement for only two positions within our government, President and Vice-President.  What did the Founding Father’s and Framers of the United States Constitution mean to do or accomplish by placing this requirement for the highest office?

First off, let us look at what the Framer’s used as a guide.

The Founding Fathers of the United States, used Vattel’s Laws of Nations as their guide and reference to meanings and definitions within our Constitution. 

The myth that the founding of American Republic was based on the philosophy of John Locke could only have been maintained, because the history of Leibniz’s influence was suppressed. The American Revolution was, in fact, a battle against the philosophy of Locke and the English utilitarians. Key to this struggle, was the work of the Eighteenth-century jurist, Emmerich de Vattel, whose widely read text, The Law of Nations, guided the framing of the United States as the world’s first constitutional republic. Vattel had challenged the most basic axioms of the Venetian party, which had taken over England before the time of the American Revolution, and it was from Vattel’s The Law of Nations, more than anywhere else, that America’s founders learned the Leibnizian natural law, which became the basis for the American System.

Benjamin Franklin’s (a signer of our Constitution) letter to Charles W.F. Dumas, December 1775
“I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly, that copy which I kept (after depositing one in our own public library here, and send the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed) has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author”?

I am sure most reading this will know who Benjamin Franklin was. However one reference will not squell the unbelief that Vattel’s Laws of Nations, is not clear enough. So do a search on Laws of Nations and you will get HUNDREDS of responses. http://rs6.loc.gov/ammem/hlawquery.html This from the Library of Congress.  Another excellent post is the following; The concept of judicial review, which Hamilton had championed in Rutgers v. Waddington, was included in the U.S. Constitution. In {The Federalist Papers,} No. 78, “The Judges as Guardians of the Constitution,” circulated as part of the debate over the new Constitution, Hamilton developed a conception of constitutional law which was coherent with Vattel’s conception. Hamilton stated that it is a “fundamental principle of republican government, which admits the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution, whenever they find it inconsistent with their happiness.” However, the Constitution can only be changed by the nation as a whole, and not by the temporary passions of the majority or by the legislature. Both to protect the Constitution, but also to ensure just enforcement of the law, the independence of the judiciary from the legislature and the executive branch is essential. The judiciary must be the guardians of the Constitution, to ensure that all legislative decisions are coherent with it. This idea championed by Hamilton, that the courts ensured that the Executive and Legislative branches followed the Constitution, was later established as a principle of American jurisprudence by Chief Justice John Marshall

Again proving the Constitution, it’s meaning, it’s wording , and it’s definitions were clearly a result of being referenced to Vattel’s Laws of Nations. So what does the Laws of Nations say about a “Natural Born Citizen”?

Vattel in Bk 1 Sec 212, states the following. 

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

As I have stated before and will state here again.  Barack Obama, he has admitted being a British citizen at birth. From his own web-site,  “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

How can a British subject at birth, be free from any foreign influence as described by John Jay in the following; 

The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 [Farrand's Records, Volume 3]
LXVIII. John Jay to George Washington.3
[Note 3: 3 Documentary History of the Constitution, IV, 237.]
New York 25 July 1787

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.

Again Alexander Hamilton (a signer of our Constitution) in the Gazette of the United States, published in Philadelphia, on June 29, 1793 “The second article of the Constitution of the United States, section first, establishes this general proposition, that “the EXECUTIVE POWER shall be vested in a President of the United States of America…The executive is charged with the execution of all laws, the law of nations, as well as the municipal law, by which the former are recognized and adopted.”

“The Law of Nations” provides the Constitutional definition of a “natural born citizen, historical records reveal that Vattel’s work was quoted at the Federal Constitutional Convention of 1787, various State Constitutional Conventions, and was also referenced in a 1785 letter by John Jay regarding a diplomatic matter.

Should any court finally decide that there IS ample evidence that Barack Obama is not qualified to hold the Office of the President of the United States, they will have to rely on Vattel as the defining definition and argument, and stare reality in the face that not only is Barack Obama unqualified, but that he is not even a US Citizen.

As a final note concerning the Supreme Court and Laws of Nations, I direct you to the following;

The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution [Elliot's Debates, Volume 3]
Saturday, June 21, 1788.

Page 564

There is to be one Supreme Court–for chancery, admiralty, common pleas, and exchequer, (which great eases are left in England to four great, courts,) to which are added criminal jurisdiction, and all cases depending on the law of nations–a most extensive jurisdiction. This court has more power than any court under heaven. One set of judges ought not to have this power–and judges, particular, who have temptation always before their eyes. The court thus organized are to execute laws made by thirteen nations, dissimilar in their customs, manners, laws, and interests. If we advert to the customs of these different sovereignties, we shall find them repugnant and dissimilar. Yet they are all forced to unite and concur in making these laws. They are to form them on one principle, and on one idea, whether the civil law, common law, or law of nations. The gentleman was driven, the other day, to the expedient of acknowledging the necessity of having thirteen different tax laws. This destroys the principle, that he who lays a tax should feel it and bear his proportion of it. This has not been answered: it will involve consequences so absurd, that, I presume, they will not attempt to make thirteen different codes. They will be obliged to make one code. How will they make one code, without being contradictory to some of the laws of the different states?

Allow me to make one more reference;

The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution [Elliot's Debates, Volume 4]
Seamen’s Bill.–For the Regulation of Seamen on Board the Public Vessels, and in the Merchant Service of the United States.
House of Representatives, February, 1813.

Mr. SEYBERT. The Constitution of the United States declares, Congress shall have power “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the United States.” Sir, the rule only relates to the mode; it is only operative during the nascent state of the political conversion, and it ceases to have effect the moment after the process has been completed. Your Constitution only recognizes the highest grade of citizenship that can be conferred. The alien is thus made a native, as it were, and is fully vested with every eight and privilege attached to the native, with the exception impressed on the Constitution Your statutes cannot deprive any particular species of citizens of the right of personal liberty, or the locomotive faculty, because the Constitution does not characterize the citizens of the United states as native and naturalized. Our great family is composed of a class of men forming a single genus, who, to all intents and purposes, are equal, except in the instance specified–that of not being eligible to the presidency of the United States. The only exception to the rule is expressed in the Constitution. If other exceptions had been contemplated by the framers of that instrument, they would also have been expressed. None other having been expressed, he said, it followed that your legislative acts could not make individual exceptions touching the occupation of a citizen. All freemen, citizens of the United States, may pursue their happiness in any manner and in any situation they please, provided they do not violate the rights of others. You cannot deny to any portion of your citizens, who desire to plough the deep, the right to do so, whilst you permit another portion of them the enjoyment of that right.

 

Mr. ARCHER. The framers of our Constitution did not intend to confine Congress to the technical meaning of the word naturalization, in the exercise of that power–the more especially when the comprehensive word rule was made use of. The principle upon which the power was to be exercised was left to the judicious exercise of Congress; all that was required was, that the rule should be uniform throughout the states. In the grant there is no other specification, as to the exercise of it, than that of its uniformity. The term naturalization was borrowed from England. It must be understood here in the sense and meaning which was, there attached to it. Whether it was absolute or qualified, it was still a naturalization. But the grant of a power in general terms necessarily implied the right to exercise that power in all its gradations. It Was in the political as it was in the natural world: the genus included the species. Besides, the power to naturalize was an attribute to sovereignty. It was either absolute or qualified; and if the grant to Congress only implied a power of unlimited naturalization, the power to qualify existed in the states or in the people, for what was not specifically granted was reserved.

In treating of the executive power, the Constitution defines the qualifications of the President. It declares that he should be a natural-born citizen, or a citizen at the adoption of the Constitution. This article is unquestionably no limitation of the power of Congress upon the subject of naturalization. It was impossible to abridge a specific grant of power without a specific limitation, and the article alluded to could not be tortured, by the most ingenious mind, to diminish, even by implication, the authority of Congress upon a subject to which it was totally irrelevant.

Obama IS a foreign national and Kenya knows it

The following was obtained from the following site.

http://www.bunge.go.ke/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf
Back-up copy: http://www.scribd.com/doc/9606845/Kenyan-National-Assembly-Wednesday-5th-November-2008-51108A

 Updated working link; http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT

Wednesday, 5th November, 2008

The House met at 9.00 a.m.

Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama’s win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled.

Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request!    *****[note - "having a Kenyan ruling the USA"!]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order, Mr. Vice-President! We are citizens of the Republic of Kenya! This is a supreme institution of this country. Our responsibility is to our country, first and foremost.

We are not citizens of the USA! Much as we appreciate and we are all happy; nonetheless we are a country ourselves.

So, it is not an excuse for a Minister to be away from his own Parliament, because he is celebrating the victory of another presidential candidate in another country.

The Assistant Minister for Water and Irrigation (Mr. Kiunjuri): Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, as you can see, people are really celebrating.

However, I am wondering whether the Americans have not reported to work and yet it is their victory.

I am also hoping that there will be no homecoming for Obama. If there is one, the Leader of Government Business should alert us in good time so that we can set up a committee to organize for his homecoming.  *[note - Obama having a Homecoming to Kenya!]

Ms. Odhiambo: … Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the President-elect, Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country.

*[note - Obama is soil of Kenya - birthright from his father]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: President-elect has not been sworn-in yet. The election of President-elect Obama is of utmost national importance to the United States of America. Ms. Odhiambo, you are a lawyer. You had better be very careful where you transgress between watching your own sovereignty and what can be interpreted in some quarters as some form of treason
(Ed. note: the threat of “treason” is not directed to Ms Odhiamdo personally, but rather concern over how Obama’s “former” Kenyan Citizenship may be viewed by outsiders)

 Mr. Affey: … For the first time, we have a leader of a great country in this world whose blood is Kenyan.

*[Note - Blood is Kenyan - again Bloodright Citizenship]

COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR CONGRATULATORY MESSAGE TO PRESIDENT-ELECT BARRACK OBAMA

Hon. Members, as you may be aware, the people of the United States of America have just had a historic election where the son of this soil, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been elected the 44th President of the United States of America…

*[Note- again - of the soil]

The Vice-President and Minister forHome Affairs (Mr. Musyoka): …
As we do, as you said from the Chair, this is a sovereign country. We know we can learn a lot.

To be able to support that blood relation, I think we owe it to ourselves to make sure that we have a peaceful country as Kenyans; a country that will uphold the true principles of the rule of law, democracy and tolerance between ourselves

At the beginning of this year, Senator Barrack Obama called me at midnight and told me: “Mr. Vice President, could you make sure you sort out this problem?” I want to assure him that the problem has since been sorted out.

*[Note- What problem needed to be sorted out?, that he was born there?] 

The Assistant Minister for Higher Education, Science and Technology (Dr. Mwiria):…

Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to take this opportunity to also congratulate Barrack Obama on his victory and also say that even as we look at that victory say it is possible, it is only possible because there are structures in place in the US that make it possible for any potential candidate to win, irrespective of whether they have a lot of money which they have gotten legally or illegally, they are from a different ethnic group and how old they are.

*[Note - illegal money contributed to the campaign of Barack Obama!]

 Mr. Chanzu: … I highly congratulate Obama and salute Americans, Black, White and other races, for what they have done in showing the world that a leader can come from any community. I also want to congratulate Kenyans for the support they have shown. It showed the Americans that we were supporting our own.
*[Note- supporting THEIR own!]

Mr. Ethuro: … Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have done it! That is why I like this Motion coming at this time of Obama – yes we can! We did it with the Parliamentary Service Commission. We did it with the Leader of the Official Opposition. We are doing it with the Official Opposition Bill. We are doing it with the establishment of the Budget Office and we are doing it with the Cabinet size! Yes we can!
*[Note - the same montra "YES WE CAN"]

Obama is an illegal alien in the United States, who has used forged documents to gain employment in this country!

Obama’s Lawyers caught in lies

Last week I was on Plains Radio, discusssing the Obama Birth Certificate fraud and some Obama lawyers came on and decided to spread lies. However they were caught. Here is a snipet of the Plains Radio chat room on Friday night;
Ed_Hale: dang no way – after the crap i took for 2 days about having the Obots on here – they an’t coming back
Jessie3: Charlene, say it like it is, we want to kick a$$
LUGNUT96: lol Ed
charlene: Ed,  Oh Come On.. Just For A Few
TexGirl: any other ladies want a piece of jimbot?
charlene: Give Us The Chance To Kick His Behind
LUGNUT96: yes
Ed_Hale:  NO No No No No
LUGNUT96: lol
KatieIN: Ed, thanks for listening to the voice of plains radio folks
charlene: And Send A Message To Barry
LUGNUT96: Yes Ed
TexGirl: kick his butt
zulu: No
LUGNUT96: lol
LUGNUT96: yes
TexGirl: we’ll gang up on him
charlene: ed, your no fun   
TexGirl: zulu and linda too?  anybody else?
Ed_Hale: Beside Jim Sent Me A Eamil Where They Surrender To Us – They Could Not Take Any More Of Us Catchign Them In Lies
lindastarr: Gang Bang Jimbot
charlene: Ed,  but it woudn’t be a question and answer session
Jessie3: really Ed, we got to them?
charlene: lol
TexGirl: Patriot-bang jimbot
X-MEN: Hey for you know he could be in here right now.
charlene: it would be a kick behind
harriet: Give him the information to send a letter to Judge Schneider will do more good.
Ed_Hale: Yes after Ken and Sc took them apart jim sent me a email saying they would not be back
TexGirl: i want a piece of jimbot … that would make my day
Jessie3: that was nice of him Ed. they have been ringing our chimes for too long and we beat em
TexGirl: i would tear him up and spit him out
charlene: look what happened,  Plaines Radio created a monster
Ed_Hale: He knows that Texgirl
LUGNUT96: Have Ken And Sc get jimbot again Ed
Leecamp: hope so robbie
TexGirl: those obot chicks needed a good swift kick in their butts
charlene: Ed..  thanks a lot and it was Your  program that created a monster ( me) lol
KC4TX: Ed they never counted on so many smart people
Ed_Hale: yes they thought all of you were like me – a dumb redneck Texan
TexGirl: fakejimbot?
LUGNUT96: loll Ed
charlene: Jessie all of us can
charlene: and ed your far from dumb..
LUGNUT96: they will be back and wwe will be ready
booklady: They’re mistake, Ed, is that you may have an accent, but dumb….no.
Pmb09 has left.
Lanie: Ed knows they wouldn’t have a chance with us.
Robbie: fakejimbot called in impersonating jimbot and we saw right through him and tore him a new a-hole.
swift: no its barry
TexGirl: we always know the ‘real’ jimbot … he’s always drunk   
harriet: charlene: there are more of us than them.
LUGNUT96: lol pof
Ed_Hale: 4 days in a row we had our show highligthed in a email – last one was “obama lawyer get their butts handed to them by 2 lay people on Plains Radio”
Robbie: Texgirl, fakejimbot sounded just like jimbot, so we think it was him and sent him out of here crying!
Jessie3: Rush said today that Bo was usurping America
Ed_Hale: and then it had the link to the archives
TexGirl: robbie … oh that is sweet …that y’all had him cryin like a baby   
Ed_Hale: that is one reson we have gotten so many new listeners
LUGNUT96: yees linda
mominva: lol X!!!!!!!!!
Robbie: i know it was jimbot because he always sounds like he is taking a sip of something and we know it is Jack Daniels.
charlene: Xmen lol
lindastarr: well I helped bring new people in too Ed
Jessie3: did you hear it lee?
LUGNUT96: well then Ed that is why we want Jimbot Back Her  then
TexGirl: jack daniels laced with koolaid
Ed_Hale: Eeveryone was so suprised that Ken and Sc were so knowldgeable on Obama
Lanie: I think they are scared to come back anay.
chuger: The people in our government today are the sons and daughtes of the radicals and revolutionaries from the 60’s and 70’s that burned and terrorized our country. They are classic Marxist, fascist National Socialist  evil people.
TexGirl: oh …well…. ken and Sc are extremely knowlegable
Lanie: anyway
Leecamp: ken and Sc rock!!!
X-MEN: I’m telling you guys what we’ve done is making an impact. My friend is a harcore Obot lover and now he calls him Hitler.
pof: I didnt see them chanhe their mind Ed
Ed_Hale: so I can get yelled at by some of the folks here Lug
LUGNUT96: Ed We Need To Send Them 2 out and on the news channels lol
Jessie3: daughter well great grand daughter of the revolution
TexGirl: my heros … ken and Sc 
TexGirl: and Ralph and Carmen 
charlene: Yes Ken and Sc are the best
zulu: good x
SC: Thanks lug
LUGNUT96: Yes Ed Lol
kaks: Yes, Ken and Sc need to go to the news channels.
TexGirl: and Ed and Caren 
LUGNUT96: hah
GHOSTfighter has joined.
LUGNUT96: welcome Sc
TexGirl: and hummingbird
X-MEN: He is not the only one, others are seeing it..
KC4TX: hi Ghost
booklady: Wb, ghostie!
Leecamp: Obama is not president…never can be.
Lanie: Obama is showing them himself Ed but now they are believing what we say.

Now I recieved the following e-mail;

> —– Forwarded Message —–
> From: “Unalienable Rights” <keeprrights@gmail.com>
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:22:46 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
> Subject: WOW! Obot Lawyers Torn Apaprt — AND– The BIG GUY –VP Procter & Gamble is TICKED at the RAT/USURPER/ “SIAP”
>
> Keep feeding strong resentments to the Fed and State reps at all levels to get them to move on out NOW with removing the RAT/USURPER/ “SIAP” from OUR TRUE AMERICANS’ HOUSE.
>
> Also, hear the Obots support lawyers get their rear ends tore out by l ayman researchers here at a down to earth news source called Plains Radio.

The other night the Obot lawyers were attempting to tell people that the STATE of Hawaii ONLY releases the abbreviated or “Short Form”. I told them that this was a lie.
They then attempted to say that all the data and records were transfered to a database and that was all they had.

I decided to re-confirm with the State of Hawaii and here is their reply.

Full Size

I decided to inquire further and dig deeper, here again is the State of Hawaii’s reply.

Full Size

Now, here is WHAT is important.

1. The State of Hawaii, still maintains ALL the origional records.

2. The Long Form Birth Certificates are still available, with a Judges Order!

3. The Obot lawyers have been caught in another Lie, and attempting not only divert attention but out and out MIS-REPRESENT facts to the American public.

Other lies are were that the “Natural Born Citizen” clause was amended. Please see here for a detail explaination: http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/natural-born-confusion-only-for-obama-supporters/

 

Signed, sealed, and delivered from Kenya

With Holloween appraching, must wonder if the ghosts of Obama past are finally coming home to haunt the illegal undocumented alien Usurper. Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama is but a pimple on the face of America. A blot as clear as the black-head that he is.  Barck Obama is a pathalogical liar and a Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) classic case study.

A recent newspaper article discovered, but origionaly printed in 2004, clearly states “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama,”

Another article released just this week, states that “It seems Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America (via a sleepy village in Kenya called Nyang’oma K’Ogelo)”

Obama supporters have a hard time excepting that the reality that he was born in Kenya, thereby eliminating all possibilty that he can even claim ‘native’ American citizenship under Title 8 of the US Code. As being born in a foreign country to an underage mother is not covered by US Jurisdiction.  One must wonder how easily his supporters aer decieved, as even the Kenyan Parliment, the Government of Kenya has stated that Barack Obama is Kenyan,  

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT

Wednesday, 5th November, 2008

The House met at 9.00 a.m.

Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama’s win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled.

Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request!    *****[note - "having a Kenyan ruling the USA"!]

Read the entire document;

http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf

So the question remains, ‘Why has Kenya been the ONLY country that has claimed Obama?’ Not one witness, hospital, doctor has stepped forward to state that Obama was born ‘ANYWHRE’ in the United States – NONE. But the country of Kenya lays claims to Obama, that he was born there, the village of his birth, a birth certificate (not the forged copies that Obama states have come from Hawaii), numerous newspaper articles and statements from public officials, including the Ambassador to Kenya.

The Constitution not only states that you must be a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ to be eligibile for the Presidency, but it also lays out the penalty for TREASON.  Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama has been in violation of the Constitution, the laws of this country and is guilty of treason.

Racism in America – It’s REAL

Humpty Obama

The following was posted on the ObamaFile. The responses that were included [here in red] are excellent and deserve to be posted everywhere. I have included additional responses [mine - in green] for some additional comments.

DOJ To Judge:  Dump Ambassador Keyes Lawsuit

The Justice Department is urging a federal court to toss out a lawsuit in which prominent attorney Orly Taitz, who is representing Ambassador Alan Keyes and 200 military members, is challenging Obama’s Constitutional qualifications to be president.

In a motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., government lawyers did not directly rebut the theory Taitz propounds that Obama was not born in Hawaii as he claims and as asserted by Hawaiian officials as well as contemporary newspaper birth notices.  Instead, the federal attorneys argued that the suit is inherently flawed because such disputes can’t be resolved in court and because the dozens of plaintiffs can’t show they are directly injured by Obama’s presence in office.

 The State of Hawaii, has not confirmed they issued a Certification in 2007 or 2008, that contains the Vital record of Barack Obama. Nor has the State of Hawaii or any officials released any information that it contains. Also it begs to ask, why if Barack Obama claims to have released his Birth Certificate, would he spend $1.6 million to keep what he has already released, sealed?

 

“It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” Assistant United States Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute wrote.  “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.” – you don’t say! — so I guess if Obama secured his office through fraud, it’s OK with the Obama JustUs Department — what a shocking surprise!

 So the numerous e-mails, calls, and letters to the Senators and Congressman that went unanswered and ignored, along with no challenge being done at the Electoral College means they completely disregarded the will of the people and committed treason by failing in their sworn duty to uphold and defend the Constitution.  Or the admission that they investigated and by the word of  Snopes.com that he was born in Hawaii. Let alone taking a newspaper announcement as a legal document.

Lieutenant Jason Freese and some other plaintiffs in the case claim they have a real injury because they are serving in the military commander by Obama, the alleged usurper.  However, West and DeJute say that argument is too speculative.

 I wonder where they received their liberal law degrees, that when something is clear and concise as John Jay’s letter to George Washington concerning the Commander of the Army, they become confused and disorientated to the point they babble, stumble, attempt to confuse the issue.

“The injuries alleged by Plaintiff Freese and the other military Plaintiffs herein, are not particularized as to them, but, rather, would be shared by all members of the military and is an inadequate basis on which to establish standing,” the government lawyers wrote. – Same old argument — “Standing” — the American People have no right to know who and what Obama is, nor where he comes from — he’s special, you know.

So if no one complains about the rules being violated the game goes on? But here they maintain that if an illegal act was committed, EVERYONE involved has to complain, before anything can be done. Imagine a murder being committed and before the accused can be charged, EVERYONE from the murderer, the victim, the family involved has to agree that something or someone was violated; a wrong was committed, before any actions or charges could be brought forth. If this is the case, how many murderers would agree that they did anything wrong. Amazing!

Another plaintiff in the suit, Alan Keyes, is a three-time, longshot presidential candidate who ran most recently in 2008.  Yet another is Gail Lightfoot, an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate in 2008. The DOJ argues that they were not directly aggrieved by Obama’s election because they never had a mathematical chance of winning.

But an illegal candidate can remain there if the voting public is too ignorant to investigate him? Again, if Barack Obama was found to be ineligible the legal candidates would have been harmed and the outcome could not have been the same. If given the choices without the illegal candidates because they were rightfully removed, who would have the voters selected? So harm was done as the federal campaign finances were available to parties with a certain level of votes.

“The [lawsuit] does not allege, nor could it allege, that any of these Plaintiffs were even on the ballot in enough states in the year 2008 to gain the requisite 270 electoral votes to win the Presidential election,” the motion states. – So what?  Since when did winning a political office become a prerequisite for running?

 Being an illegal candidate and disqualified in one State, would have opened the vetting process and allowed the voters to make an informed decision. Questions were raised prior to the conventions and again ignored.  

The Justice Department brief takes a few shots at the wackiness of the birthers, accusing them of trafficking in “innuendo” and advancing “a variety of vaguely-defined claims purportedly related to a hodgepodge of constitutional provisions, civil and criminal statutes, and the Freedom of Information Act.”

 Those arguments notwithstanding, the DOJ lawyers were pretty kind to the birthers and to Taitz, since the filings in the case are replete with spelling errors, among others. Taitz submitted another purported foreign birth certificate for Obama last week in a filing labeled, “Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate for Barack Obama.”

The case is set for a hearing Tuesday morning before Judge David Carter.

This biased report could have been written by Obama, himself.  I have removed many of the pejoratives that Gerstein sprinkled “liberally” throughout the source article.  This Obot doesn’t mention that Taitz is representing Ambassador Allen Keyes, the Independent Party candidate for POTUS, and 200 military officers and non-commissioned officers till halfway through this smear job.

  I guess Gerstein believes that “a three-time, longshot presidential candidate” or “an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate” is not entitled to justice. These lefties make me want to hurl!  It’s all justice for me, but not for thee, with these people.

 

  Only an Obama JustUs Department, protector of the New Black Panther Party, could claim a plaintiff shouldn’t be heard, shouldn’t receive justice, because, “…they never had a mathematical chance of winning.” Furthermore, what in the hell is Justice Department lawyers doing defending Obama in this suit?  It’s bad enough that Obama has illegally spent at least $600,000 from his campaign funds, to compensate Perkins Coie for legal services, to keep his bona fides from the American People — now he’s got Civil Service lawyers from the JJustUs Department representing him.

Agent 00-Bama – The British Muslim 00 Agent

Barack Obama aka Barrack Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama aka ? was born….

 when …. unknown

where …. unknown

 However from the country that does claim him, 

Citizenship at Birth …. British 

 This is admitted by Barack Obama aka ? and is the ONLY citizenship mentioned or claimed.

Citizenship then changed to include Kenyan when British East Africa a British Colony gained independence in Dec 1963.

 If he never exercised his option of converting it to Kenyan, his British citizenship remained intact.

 Citizenship by adoption… Indonesian Barack Obama adopted by Lolo Soetoro. School registration identifies male attending school as Barry Soetoro, Citizenship – Indonesian 

There has never been any confirmation, allegation that Barack Obama aka ? actually had, has, ever held any American citizenship in his life.

The ONLY reason that there is even a hint of ‘NATIVE’ US citizenship is that he claims to have been born in Hawaii. There has never been any substantiated proof of that.

 At Occidential he was housed with foreign students. WHY?

Unless his registration and documents hinted at this, it would have been against protocol and procedure, don’t you think? 

Therefore why would he, as a foreigner elect to sign up for the selective service in a foreign country, the United States.

Guess where they DID put out the Welcome mat and signs? Africa. 

Obama aka ? is not eligible for the Presidency, but that he is also an illegal alien who has used forged documents in gaining employment in the United States.

 From his own web-site Fight the Smears, “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

How could it have expired in 1982, ‘IF HE NEVER HAD IT?’

Also off ‘FTS’ to the left of the main post. “The fact is Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”
Again, ‘Native’ citizen not ‘Natural Born citizen’

As for the Indonesian citizenship, here is my blog post.
Showing the Indonesian school registration.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/03/28/so-who-is-he/

WND has also displayed the same.

Key fact;
Obama and his supporters can’t have it both ways. Either he is Barack Obama born in Hawaii with a foreign father and admitted British at birth, or he is Barry Soetoro who entered the US without going through the US Customs and Naturalization process and is an illegal alien.

Obama stands before the American flag 

Obama stands before the Soviet Union’s Flag
However if and I quote ‘IF‘ Obama was born in Hawaii, then he would have released his Birth Certificate long ago. There is NO evidence and documentation that he was in fact born in Hawaii or any other part of the United States. The COLB’s that have been posted are forgeries.

http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/