• SiteMeter

No Christmas for ObamaLand

Over the past few weeks I have posted additional material concerning the COLB forgery. I have posted one minor piece a bit  off key to keep one person off track. But I had a reason for this. While he has been  chasing his tail, I have been distributing material and statements to lawyers and other people.  As mentioned in my previous post, about this person and what steps I have taken. But as they say on tv “But wait there’s more”

Here is the Christmas present to all of ObamaLand and this lawyer.  

I have updated my previous post to include the origional image that was to be posted, but swapped to keep Loren Christopher Collins, Obot lawyer and George Soros little hack’s panties in a wad. When in reality the only thing that he did was to now push all the evidence into other peoples hand including my relatives who are personal  friends of Chuck and Sally Heath. I will leave it to the readers to find out who Chuck and Sally Heath are.

So all in ObotLand, you can thank Loren Christopher Collins for the information about the COLB forgery, including a much more detailed analysis and statements being in the hands of those who can really use it.

One Response

  1. No one other then two un-qualified FactCheck people has ever seen a physical document. The digital images are telling enough that discrepancies exist.

    Enough discrepancies exist that call into question the document itself. The State of Hawaii has also stated following “Janice Okubo and the registrar looked at the CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH Politifact sent them and concluded: “I don’t know that it’s possible for us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents.” So discrepancies exist where the issuing agency would not authenticate what they were presented.

    The State of Hawaii can only release the vital records to an immediate family member or Barack Obama himself. That is state law. Also releasing that information in any other manner would place the officials under a violation.

    the birth announcements are not legal documents and even Chris Matthews had to admit that under a direct question. The birth announcement contains an address where neither of the listed parents resided. They also do not contain any vital data, such as hospital, doctor, or witness. Be advised that Dr Rodney west story was debunked in mere hours and that the Nordyke twins who were born on the 5th of aug are not even listed in either of the newspapers.

    So how come the Nordyke twins born born on the 5th of Aug are not in the newspaper announcements, born in a hospital, long forms on file, are not there.

    So how’s does Hawaii maintain more then one birth record?

    My training or backgound is not the issue.

    Obama using forged documents is. The fact that his COLB has been established as a forgery and the fact that he continues to fight lawsuits, while claiming he released a valid document is telling within itself.

    The forged COLB is part and parcel of the fabricated history of Barack Hussein Obama, and that was a made up fairy tale and that is what people were sold and they brought- hook, line, and sinker.

    Prima facie evidence only that a birth took place, not to where or when, and the COLB has statements that are incorrect.

    http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0011.htm

    §338-11 Form of certificates. The forms of certificates shall include as a minimum the items required by the respective standard certificates as recommended by the Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics, subject to approval of and modification by the department of health. In addition, the forms of death certificates shall require the individual’s social security number. The form and use of the certificates shall be subject to sections 338-16 to 338-18. [L 1949, c 327, §15; RL 1955, §57-14; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-11; am L 1997, c 293, §17]

    Established in 1949, The National Center for Health Statistics, catagorized the data starting in 1900.

    http://www.nber.org/vital-statistics/historical/

    1961 Guideline

    http://www.nber.org/vital-statistics/historical/nat61_1.CV.pdf

    Section 5, the technical appendix. Review race and color, and explain how the race ‘African’ is exceptable?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers

%d bloggers like this: