The Adoption of Obama
Like with ‘anything’ regarding the past of Obama, nothing should be taken for granted or on face value. Both of his books by Obama’s own words can NOT be taken literally. They are nothing more then a facade, a mask of the true background and nature of Barack Obama, created to produce the Obama effect on whomever wants to believe in unicorns and forest fairies.
Currently Obama refuses to release any documents regarding his past. We are to except what is written as fact, regardless if it conflicts with, or when the document is changed by necessity.
Let us reason why Obama refuses to show where he was born. Obama claims to have been born at the Kapi’olani Medical Center Hospital, then within months claims to have been born in Queens Hospital.
Claiming and facts are different. Fact is that both hospitals fail to claim Barack Obama being born there as do other medical centers that have been contacted by researchers.
We know from several separate statements made by his Grandmother Sarah that the following are known.
- Obama was born in Kenya
- She [Grandmother Sarah] was present at his birth
Now, the remarks of one person might be questioned. But even back in the beginning of his campaign ads with “Kenyan-Born” crept up overseas, and the recent trip to Ghana again was riddled with “Returning to his Continent of Birth” and news video of people stating that Obama was Kenyan.
But again, another ‘UNKNOWN’ must be included. Who was Barack Obama’s birth mother?
Just like with and I quote ‘EVERYTHING’ that is known and factual; the facts go so far and then drop off. Again, notice the above, Obama was born in Kenya and she was there, but it stops at a critical point, who was his mother.
Recently Barack Obama stated that he was a few months old when the Bay of Pigs invasion happened. A slip of the tongue or a genuine remark. Let’s dissect that statement with known facts. The Bay of Pigs invasion took place on April 1961. Obama claims to have been born on Aug 4th 1961, four months after the event. What if in reality Obama was born prior to April 1961.
“Obama openly admits he is offering a psychological autobiography, not a chronological one. The dialogue is an ‘approximation’ . . . the characters are ‘composites’ … ‘events appear out of precise chronology.'”
Let’s take another time period that Obama has placed relevance in, Nov 1960. The time period that Obama ‘CLAIMS’ his parents meet. Combine that with the statement from Grandma Sarah and you have the picture a little more clearly.
Obama was dumped on Stanley Ann and Obama Sr took off to parts unknown and elsewhere like Harvard.
Well if Stanley Ann Durham was NOT his mother then who was/is?
First off, the gloves come off. We have always assumed that Stanley Ann was his mother. What if the reason Obama refuses to release his ‘RECORD’ that Hawaii has on files, is that it is NOT a Birth record, but an adoption record?
Imagine that Obama finds his Birth Certificate in the box as described in “Dreams of My Father” and discovers that whom he thought was his mother WASN’T. Think of the resentment, the betrayal. when he’s old enough he starts using his ‘African’ name instead of his whitey name. He then goes on his travel of discovery, back to Africa to find his roots, To find his REAL mother, only Granny Sarah confirms the story. then to Indonesia to confront his mother and onto Pakistan where the real Barry finds solstice in the breeding hatred of Islam, and back to the US, and he uses the name Obama again. Dropping Soetoro as the anger against his mother is festering and now he’s Barack Obama ONLY. Created by paper once before, he re-creates himself again by using ‘HIS’ name.
It also explains his white race hatred, esp. the teachings of Black theology in Wright’s Church. His non-advertising his ‘mother’s race’
From Dreams of My Father: ‘I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.’
From Dreams of My Father: ‘I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.’
From Dreams of My Father: ‘There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.’
From Dreams of My Father: ‘It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.’
From Dreams of My Father: ‘I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.’
From Audacity of Hope: ‘I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.’
This is a perverse/warped/twisted individual outlook on his own biological mother is nothing less then alarming! It only adds to the mounting evidence that Stanley Ann was NOT his birth mother and the resentment that Barack Obama fostered because of the lies that were told to him. Stanley Ann became the evil step-mother in Cinderella and Obama’s used that fantasy to foster the hatred not only towards his mother, but also to his mother’s race.
This also clears up, the Dr Rodney West story that was floated around just prior to the inauguration. Dr Rodney West, whom the Obots touted as the Dr who first spanked Obama NEVER came forward and said that he delivered him. When he [Dr Rodney West] was still alive during the beginning of the campaign no mention was ever made. Dr Rodney West would also have all his patient records as an infant and possibly for his mother. SO we have the Dr, who died last year who like the hospital has NEVER stepped forward and confirmed ANYTHING.
And lastly the documents that Kenya has stated they have sealed are explained. The birth certificate that was generated by law when Barack Obama was born in Kenya has his real birth’s mother name and that is why they have protected it from seeing the light of day, as it contains a name other then Stanley Ann Obama.
Here are the official State of Hawaii guidelines concerning adoption records.
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0020_0005.htm
§338-20.5 Adoption; foreign born persons. (a) The department of health shall establish a Hawaii certificate of birth for a person born in a foreign country and for whom a final decree of adoption has been entered in a court of competent jurisdiction in Hawaii, when it receives the following:
(1) A properly certified copy of the adoption decree, or certified abstract thereof on a form approved by the department; and
(2) A copy of any investigatory report and recommendation which may have been prepared by the director of social services; and
(3) A report on a form to be approved by the department of health setting forth the following:
(A) Date of assumption of custody;
(B) Sex;
(C) Color or race;
(D) Approximate age of child;
(E) Name and address of the person or persons adopting said child;
(F) Name given to child by adoptive parent or parents;
(G) True or probable country of birth.
Or this;
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0021.htm
§338-21 Children born to parents not married to each other. (a) All children born to parents not married to each other, irrespective of the marriage of either natural parent to another, (1) on the marriage of the natural parents with each other, (2) on the voluntary, written acknowledgements of paternity under oath signed by the natural father and the natural mother, or (3) on establishment of the parent and child relationship under chapter 584, are entitled to the same rights as those born to parents married to each other and shall take the name so stipulated by their parents or, if the parents do not agree on the name, shall take the name specified by a court of competent jurisdiction to be the name that is in the best interests of the child. The original certificate of birth shall contain the name so stipulated. The child or children or the parents thereof may petition the department of health to issue a new original certificate of birth, and not a duplicate of the original certificate that has been amended, altered, or modified, in the new name of the child, and the department shall issue the new original certificate of birth. As used in this section “name” includes the first name, middle name, or last name.
(b) The evidence upon which the new original certificate is made, and the superseded original certificate shall be sealed and filed and may be opened only upon order of a court of record.
(c) If the child’s natural parents marry each other and desire to change the child’s name, the child’s name may be changed and a new original certificate of birth prepared.
(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the power of the courts to order the department to prepare new certificates of birth under section 584-23. [L 1949, c 327, §25; RL 1955, §57-24; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 6, §2; HRS §338-21; am L 1975, c 66, §2(4); am L 1980, c 153, §5; am L 1983, c 65, §2; am L 1986, c 287, §1; am L 1987, c 100, §2; am L 1988, c 141, §27; am L 1993, c 131, §3]
The true or probable country of birth shall be known as the place of birth, and the date of birth shall be determined by approximation. This report shall constitute an original certificate of birth; and
(4) A request that a new certificate of birth be established.
Attorney General Opinions
Department of health’s preparation of a new birth certificate pursuant to paternity orders. Att. Gen. Op. 87-6.
Case Notes
Legitimacy or illegitimacy fixed at birth and cannot be changed by subsequent legislation. 3 H. 459; 4 H. 548. Prior to amendment of Act 71, L 1907, children of adulterous intercourse not legitimated by subsequent marriage of parents. 4 H. 292; 17 H. 45, 415, aff’d 210 U.S. 149. Legitimation by subsequent marriage. 29 H. 258, aff’d 16 F.2d 273.
Child begotten and born out of wedlock even though legitimated by statute on marriage of parents, is not “lawfully begotten child” within meaning of will. 14 H. 271.
Presumption of legitimacy is not conclusive, but rebuttable. 30 H. 574. Evidence to rebut presumption. 49 H. 273, 414 P.2d 925.
Effect of legitimation on necessity of father’s consent to adoption of child. 52 H. 395, 477 P.2d 780.
In short the ‘Adoption of Obama’ into the marriage of Obama/Durham created on paper, the “Aug 4th 1961 in Hawaii” existence of the one known as “Barack Hussein Obama” born of a foreign and British ‘subject’ Barack Obama Sr and others unknown in Kenya. This fulfills the puzzle in a complete circle. But it also mandates that as long as Barack Hussein Obama can confuse and claim to be born in Hawaii or at least to a US Citizen mother, then a certain number of the public will be slumbered into believing a ‘Native’ Citizen is eligible for the Presidency, where as a foreign born, with foreign parents leaves no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Durham aka Barry Obama is exactly who he ‘CLAIMS’ he is, at the moment he’s claiming it, but in no way a ‘Natural Born’ Citizen as required by the United States Constitution.
Filed under: Barack, Natural Born Citizen, Presidential | Tagged: Adoption, alien, Ann, Barack, Birth, Birth Certificate, Forgery, Hawaii, Hospital, Illegal, Kenya, Obama, POTUS, Stanley, TOTUS |
We don’t even know for sure if Stanley Ann Dunham was Obama’s biological mother. He could be the son of “one” of his
father’s other WIVES, and adopted by Ann (like a Madonna kid)
(there can be two birth certificate’s)
Under Hawaii statute’s, and most other state’s, when an adoption
occur’s, the original birth certificate (not colb) is “sealed”,
and a new birth certificate is issued. This is to protect the
privacy of the individual’s, or natural parent’s who put a child
up for adoption. In most cases the child may not have
access to those record’s until 18 years old. The record’s can
be blocked from view by written request every ten year’s.
All people want, is to “confirm” the authenticity of Obama’s
birth certificate, not a “colb” posted on a website.
Obama could clear this up immediately by simply providing his
long form birth certificate to be authenticated by qualified
independent inspector’s. That is unless YOU HAVE IT..
Obama’s parent’s abandoned him…did his Grandmother adopt him?
http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol12_Ch0501-0588/HRS0578/HRS_0578-0002.htm
578-02 (in part
Persons as to whom consent not required or whose consent may be dispensed with by order of the court.
(1) Persons as to whom consent not required:
(A) A parent who has deserted a child without affording means of identification for a period of ninety days;
** (B) A parent who has voluntarily surrendered the care and custody of the child to another for a period of two years;
(C) A parent of the child in the custody of another, if the parent for a period of at least one year has failed to communicate with the child when able to do so;
(D) A parent of a child in the custody of another, if the parent for a period of at least one year has failed to provide for the care and support of the child when able to do so;
(E) A natural father who was not married to the child’s mother at the time of the child’s conception or birth and who does not fall within the provisions of subsection (a)(3), (4), or (5);
(F) A parent whose parental rights have been judicially terminated under the provisions of sections 571-61 to 571-63, or under the provisions of any other state or other law by a court or other agency having jurisdiction to take the action;
(H) Any legal guardian or legal custodian of the child sought to be adopted, other than a parent, who has failed to respond in writing to a request for consent for a period of sixty days or who, after examination of the person’s written reasons for withholding consent, is found by the court to be withholding the person’s consent ……. (then go to 578-14 to 15 etc..)
Bottom Line is that many question’s may be answered by Obama
showing the detail’s of his birth certificate.
The posted “colb” is a joke…with a blacked out area.
It also only say’s “date filed” by Registrar…
Most say “date accepted” by Registrar…. The Truth will come out!
We know that Obama was adopted by Leo Soetoro in Indonesia, So wouldn’t there be a New Birth certificate in Indonesia for Barry Soetoro? My daughter was adopted by second husband and they gave Her a New birthcertificate.
Using your links, one can scroll to § 338-5, compulsory registration. All Dunham needed was proof of Hawaiian residency and the birth could be registered to the time, date, and place she attested.
Allegiance is the sole discriminatory purpose of Article II’s natural born citizen requirement. Sole allegiance by nature is through the father and of only one nationality.
Obama was born with Kenyan/African and U.S. nationalities. He chose in his age of discretion to abandon that of his U.S. mother and agrandize that of his black/Luo/Marxist father.
While Obama re-established his U.S. birthright citizenship through 1952 INA § 301, his Muslim and Communist leanings were incompatible to 8 USC 1429.
It will be sooner better than later when this corrupt and illegitimate person is removed from the presidency.
Let the truth be known. It is right that he be obligated to show proof of a legitamate Birth certificate in order to remain as our president.
The courts will decide soon.
http://www.meetup.com/Natural-Born-Citizen-Coalition-for-Legal-Action/
All you have to do to learn about Barry is just listen to himburying himself. He states his parents met in nov 60. If so hewas born at five months,everyone lets these statements go over their heads.
He has given two hospitals where he was born so he was a five month born baby twice?
This man is a liar and a Kenyan. send him back home and stop tearing up our country.
the man is clearly not a us natural born. It is frivilous for the democrats to try to hide it. As with everything else the teruth will surface in an unexpected way. sooner or later he will be forced out. The supporters are only fooling themselves. There is just too much that shows he is not who he says he is. Unless he produces papersa he swore in under a fake name. He is Barry soetoro not barack Obama.so from the gitgo he has commited a felony.
He should be tried as a traitor and removed from the statles as a personnongralta. HE IS AT BEST AN ILLEGAL AND SHOULD BE SHOT.
[…] the ‘Adoption of Obama’ Like this:LikeBe the first to like […]
Nixon was impeached for far less than what Obama has done. Oh, that’s right, Nixon was a white republican so I guess that’s OK. Is it because Obama is a half-black liberal democrat that what he’s done is excused? If I hear anything more about republicans being racist, after all this, I will vomit for sure. The democrats are racist, that’s just the way it is.