The COLB Playing Card

screen1

I have been keeping track of the COLB’s that have been posted on the internet. The lastest entry is the “Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate”. Here is a screen shot of the main page [below] it has embedded images of the Hawaiian and kenyan Templates that were used to create the forgeries.

The Obama COLB’s posted on “FTS” – Fight the Smears and FactCheck were created with the Hawaiian template [embedded] the date stamp Jun 6 – 2007 is clearly visible on the template and the several anomolies, such as the dots that others have mentioned are also visible.

The Kenyan Template is also embedded.

The Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate also known as the eBay Certificate is not in a singular image, but rather several screenshots. First impression on this one was it was a xeroxed copy of a Hospital Birth Certificate that would have been given to Obama’s parents. Hence the presence of the footprint. This xeroxed copy under higher contract would have resulted in the extra dark lettering and lack of finer details in the footprint itself. The additional information, such as the attending Doctor made this one a bit more convincing. One detail that was still lacking is Barack Obama Sr age, still only refered to as ’25’ with no specific date. This was one clue that initially dropped the believability factor. Without another similar document from the same era and institution, it would be hard to authenticate this one.

However, one thing that all these COLB’s have in common is the ease that a Birth Certification or Certificate can be forged and presented as a real document. Leading to what others have refered to as a ‘breeder’ document.  Where a false or forged Birth Certificate can be used to generate additional documents. Illegal’s have been using this tactis for many years.  Only now has the industry looked at it, and even FoxNews has reported on it.

Again, and as I will state making all the more important for the State of Hawaii to release whatever ‘record’ they have on file for Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Obama aka Barry Dunham aka ?

Here is a word doc with the blank templates. The COLB Playing Card

Here is a link to the full spreadsheet:

An African Original

TuskerAndObama

Agent 00-Bama – The British Muslim 00 Agent

Barack Obama aka Barrack Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama aka ? was born….

 when …. unknown

where …. unknown

 However from the country that does claim him, ObamaKenyanBorn

Citizenship at Birth …. British 

FactCheck4

 This is admitted by Barack Obama aka ? and is the ONLY citizenship mentioned or claimed.

Citizenship then changed to include Kenyan when British East Africa a British Colony gained independence in Dec 1963.

 If he never exercised his option of converting it to Kenyan, his British citizenship remained intact.

 Citizenship by adoption… Indonesian Barack Obama adopted by Lolo Soetoro. School registration identifies male attending school as Barry Soetoro, Citizenship – Indonesian obamaindonesia

There has never been any confirmation, allegation that Barack Obama aka ? actually had, has, ever held any American citizenship in his life.

The ONLY reason that there is even a hint of ‘NATIVE’ US citizenship is that he claims to have been born in Hawaii. There has never been any substantiated proof of that.

 At Occidential he was housed with foreign students. WHY?

Unless his registration and documents hinted at this, it would have been against protocol and procedure, don’t you think? obamaandroommate-470

Therefore why would he, as a foreigner elect to sign up for the selective service in a foreign country, the United States.

Guess where they DID put out the Welcome mat and signs? Africa. ObamaWelcomeHomeAfrica

Obama aka ? is not eligible for the Presidency, but that he is also an illegal alien who has used forged documents in gaining employment in the United States.

 From his own web-site Fight the Smears, “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

How could it have expired in 1982, ‘IF HE NEVER HAD IT?’

Also off ‘FTS’ to the left of the main post. “The fact is Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”
Again, ‘Native’ citizen not ‘Natural Born citizen’

FactCheck4
As for the Indonesian citizenship, here is my blog post.
Showing the Indonesian school registration.

https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/03/28/so-who-is-he/

WND has also displayed the same.

Key fact;
Obama and his supporters can’t have it both ways. Either he is Barack Obama born in Hawaii with a foreign father and admitted British at birth, or he is Barry Soetoro who entered the US without going through the US Customs and Naturalization process and is an illegal alien.

Obama stands before the American flag ObamaAnthemUS

Obama stands before the Soviet Union’s FlagObamaAnthemRussia
However if and I quote ‘IF‘ Obama was born in Hawaii, then he would have released his Birth Certificate long ago. There is NO evidence and documentation that he was in fact born in Hawaii or any other part of the United States. The COLB’s that have been posted are forgeries.

https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/07/27/292/

Senate Resolution 511 and what it really means

Most people looking into the eligibility issue concerning Barack Obama aka Barrack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Dunham aka Barry Obama, [sounds more like a wanted posted with all these alias’s], have seen SR511. Senate Resolution 511 is in terms the defining moment when the Senate gave its approval for one of their own, to circumvent the laws of this nation.

Let’s look at  SR511 and it’s interpretation of the Presidential eligibility

 Here is the Resolution text.

 Recognizing that John Sidney McCain, III, is a natural born citizen.

Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

 Now, let us take this simple and explore its hidden meaning.

 Whereas the Constitution of the United States requires that, to be eligible for the Office of the President, a person must be a `natural born Citizen’ of the United States;

They apparently have read the Constitution and have zeroed in on one clause that no law or legislative body has the right to amend.

Whereas the term `natural born Citizen’, as that term appears in Article II, Section 1, is not defined in the Constitution of the United States;

 The term ‘natural born citizen’ is not defined, however other rulings by the Supreme Court, Congress, and other writings from such as John Bingham, do define what a ‘natural born citizen’ is. For sake of space I will only quote the following.

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_Z…

Whereas there is no evidence of the intention of the Framers or any Congress to limit the constitutional rights of children born to Americans serving in the military nor to prevent those children from serving as their country’s President;

 So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they claimed to have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.

Whereas such limitations would be inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the `natural born Citizen’ clause of the Constitution of the United States, as evidenced by the First Congress’s own statute defining the term `natural born Citizen’;

 So the Senate decided to make assumptions and attempt to pass a ‘Gentleman’s Agreement’ on the same. We have already seen from the prior statement that they have no knowledge of the meaning, and its definition.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of the United States is preserved and enhanced by the men and women who are assigned to serve our country outside of our national borders;

 It sounds nice, but means nothing? Some fluff but again means nothing.

Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were understood to be eligible to be President; and

 Whom are they referring to, that was born ‘outside’ the United States and who deemed them eligible?

Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen’ under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.

So the Senate gave by law, what nature failed to do. Would that not be a ‘naturalized’ citizenship?

So the Senate deemed that two (2) American or US Citizen parents was an essential to the definition of a ‘natural born citizen’ that was not defined in the Constitution. So how did they deem that the issue was being born outside the jurisdiction of the United States if they had no definition or requirements of what ‘constituted’ a ‘natural born citizen?’ It seems like they know the definition, but are hoping the American public doesn’t. There is but one defintion that a ‘natural born citizen’ has to have citizen parents and being born in country and that is Vattel’s Law of Nations.

As I refered to SR 511. SR511 is a non-binding, non-lawful understanding, that can not be held as a LAW. Being such, a non-binding resolution is a written motion adopted by a deliberative body that cannot progress into a law. The substance of the resolution can be anything that can normally be proposed as a motion.This type of resolution is often used to express the body’s approval or disapproval of something which they cannot otherwise vote on, due to the matter being handled by another jurisdiction, or being protected by a constitution.

Again, I will note: being protected by a constitution.

“Simple resolutions do not require the approval of the other house nor the signature of the President, and they do not have the force of law.”

The reason I make this point is that for the chance that John Mccain would have actually won the 2008 Presidential election. The issue of his eligibility not only would have been brought up, but would have stated congressional hearings, the likes of Watergate all over again. The Congress would have in no time instituted articles of impeachment and the motion would have been approved. Then the Senate would have their chance to remove John McCain, however since they already have voted with their ‘Gentlemen’s Agreement’, regardless how the vote went. A non-binding, non-lawful resolution that trumps the United States Constitution could be waved in front of the American public, and John McCain, could go back in the corner, stick his thumb in his pie, and exclaim “Oh, what a good boy am I.”

Senate Resolution 511, was an attempt to circumvent the United States Constitution, and amend the ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Clause of which there has NEVER been an amendment or change too.

More then just a non-binding resolution, SR511 defined John McCain’s eligibility based on  being born of US Parents [NOTE the plural] but outside the country. Therefore the only alternative based on THEIR wording is ‘born in country’. They did not change the requirement of two (2) US parents.

Where is there a definition as to a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ based on parents [again plural] and born in country? Vattel’s Law of Nations.

Why if John McCain was held to these requirements, was Barack Obama not held of being born of US Parents [plural] and in the United States. 

Barack Obama has admitted that not only was his father a foreign national, but that he himself was a British Subject at birth. A British Subject is a foreign national and how can a foreign national be a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ as required by the United States Constitution?