The illegal undocumented alien says…
I don’t question your faith. I already know your a Muslim. You yourself admitted it on ABC, George Stephanopoulos had to correct you. Your apology tour that started in Cairo, where again you lived as a Muslim in not one, not two, but three countries. Where you lied about America being a Muslim nation. You lied again, you prayed at the Mosque in Turkey. Religion is not something that normal people lie and decieve about. God will not be mocked!
As for your Citizenship, there is every indication based on the preponderance of evidence, your
As for questioning your Citizenship, there is no debate. Based on the preponderance of evidence and your admission, “As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.” Barack Hussein Obama is and maintains CITIZENSHIP as a BRITISH Subject, based on the British Nationality Act of 1948, which as a British subject was entitled to have a great variety of rights, which they acquire by being born in the king’s ligeance, and can never forfeit by any distance of place or time, but only by their own misbehaviour; the explanation of which rights is the principal subject of the law. 1. Bl. Com. 371.
The Natural Born Citizen ‘requirement’ [not a suggestion] of the United States Constitution is clear.
Vattel in Bk 1 Sec 212, states the following. § 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
Barack Hussein Obama, born of a foreign father, under the jurisdiction of foreign law [The British Nationality Act of 1948] regardless of his birth location is not/can not/nor ever be a ‘Natural Born Citizen of the United States while being a British subject at birth.
The Supreme Court of the United States, in The Venus, relied upon Vattel’s “Law of Nations” as the authority on citizenship issues.
The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 1814
“Vattel, …is more explicit and more satisfactory on it [CITIZENSHIP ISSUES] than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, [Vattel] says, ‘the citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or indigenes, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.’ ”
Even the 14th Amendment and Titile 8 of the US Code state the following;
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. And this would be ‘NATIVE’ citizenship as compared with “Natural Born’ citizenship.
The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.”
You lied about transparency and your policies. The day that you were sworn in, the very first thing you did was sign a executive order 13489 sealing all your records? Transparency again, no BS. The healthcare debates on C-SPAN, again nothing but lies. When an active member of the United States Armed Forces questioned your eligibility, instead of manning up and proving your eligibility you hid, and revoked his orders, to have the case dismissed. A chicken**** way to pawning yourself as Commander-in-Chief.
I don’t question or doubt your ‘citizenship’, your a British subject/citizen.