When did Kenya became Hawaii?

 When did Kenya become Hawaii?

Barack Hussein Obama claims to have been born on the island of Oahu in Hawaii on Aug 4th, 1961. This claim is backed up by one and only one document [in three versions], and not one these has been proven to be a valid and authentic document. Just because it was initially accepted, does not mean it is real or factual.

More to the point, until Barack Hussein Obama was campaigning for the Presidency his place of birth was not an issue. The Constitutional requirements for the Presidency are clearly laid out in the United States Constitution Art. 2 sec. 5.  As it has been established here that a Natural Born Citizen is a person born to Citizen parent(s) at the minimal standards, but also born in country. Link SR 511 confirms this.

So if being born in the United States is all that is required for eligibility for the Presidency, Barack Hussein Obama should have no issue releasing a long form Birth Certificate issued from the State of Hawaii. Correct?  A long form Birth certificate contains all the recorded vital static’s at the moment of birth, the doctor, the witnesses, the weight, siblings (if any), parents, their occupations and other static’s.

So the question is ‘When did Kenya become Hawaii?’  Because until the campaign newspaper articles that referred too Barack Hussein Obama all reported ‘Kenyan-Born’.

[click on the images below for a larger pop-up]

The first is a report that when Obama was running for Illinois State Senator he was ‘Kenyan-Born’. The report is from the AP or Associated Press. So even before Barack Hussein Obama was campaigning as a Presidential candidate the news media was reporting Obama as ‘Kenyan-Born’.

The Kenyan Government on their official record states that Obama was born in Kenya and is not even a US Citizen.  Link and more statements by the Kenyan Government

Barack Hussein Obama’s own wife Michelle has stated more then once that Kenya is his ‘Home Country’

So when did Kenya become Hawaii?

Letter of support for Lt Col. Terry Lakin

Barack Hussein Obama now has his political prisoner, and thanks to the United States military and the Uniform Code of Military Justice, an 18 year Army veteran with a simple question is penalized beyond words.

 The oath that an Officer in the United States takes upon commissioning is as follows;

“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

Faith and allegiance to the United States Constitution to protect and defend it against all enemies foreign and domestic an oath that you took without reservation and freely obligated yourself, and your sacred honor to uphold. That means that on one is above that law that you swore to uphold and defend.

Now, another officer will pay the price for upholding his affirmation and sacred honor questioning the eligibility of a possible foreign born immigrant and usurper to the Office of the Presidency. Namely that Barack Hussein Obama has not established himself as qualified to hold the office that despite being elected, the same Constitution that Lt Col. Terry Lakin swore to uphold and defend is the same that states that the President elect has to qualify…

Amendment 20 – Presidential, Congressional Terms. Ratified 1/23/1933.

3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify…

The fact remain that Barack Obama with a foreign father and unknown place of birth, is questionable at best and a Usurper at the worst.

At no time has the United States Constitution and the Constitutional requirements for the Office of the Presidency been altered or amended to allow for anyone other then a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ of the United States to be eligible for the Presidency and Commander in Chief on the United States military forces.  That would require a Constitutional amendment, and that has never happened.

Why is it that a member of the United States military deploying to a war zone, has to produce a valid Birth Certificate and the current resident in the White House as Commander in Chief does not? Not only has he failed to produce a valid document, but all the other personal records and documents are also forbidden. Why?

Does your scared honor, duty, and obligation in bearing true faith and allegiance in the United States Constitution allow you to openly disregard another Officers attempt to fulfill his obligation and bypass the establish set of rules in a military court and deprive another of a honorable defense  and reduce that court to a kangaroo circus?

As a former serviceman to this nation, I am appalled at the military has decided to turn on its own and allow an officer to become a political prisoner because the evidence would be an embarrassment to anyone regardless of whom that person might be.

Obama’s Political Prisoner

The Congressional Research Office agrees

The Congressional Research Office agrees that Barack Hussein Obama has not released his Birth Certificate.

For the past two years Americans have been flooding congressional offices with demands for answers to these questions. And now we know. The answer to the first question is, “No, Obama is not eligible to serve as president because he is not a ‘natural born’ U.S. citizen.” The answer to the second question is, “The Jack Maskell Memorandum.”

By far the most frequently asked question in America since August 28, 2008, the closing day of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, is this: “Does Barack Hussein Obama meet the constitutional qualifications to serve as President of the United States?” With every reason to believe that he does not, the second most-asked question has been, “How could every single member of Congress… all 535 of them… fail in their constitutional obligation to properly vet Obama’s qualifications before certifying the vote of the 2008 Electoral College?”

Maskell’s recently-discovered memorandum, dated April 3, 2009 and distributed to all members of Congress, contains the following words:

“Many of the inquiries have questioned why then-Senator, and now President, Obama has not had to produce an original, so-called ‘long’ version of a ‘birth certificate’ from the State of Hawaii, how federal candidates are ‘vetted’ for qualifications generally, and have asked for an assessment of the various allegations and claims of non-eligibility status…

“Concerning the production or release of an original birth certificate, it should be noted that there is no federal law, regulation, rule, guideline, or requirement that a candidate for federal office produce his or her original birth certificate, or a certified copy of the record of live birth, to any official of the United States government; nor is there a requirement for federal candidates to publicly release such personal record or documentation. Furthermore, there is no specific federal agency or office that ‘vets’ candidates for federal office as to qualifications or eligibility prior to return.”

This is not correct as Dwight D Eisenhower filed a long form Birth Certificate when questioned about his eligibility.

Clearly, Mr. Maskell overlooked the words of the 20th Amendment, which reads in part, “If a president shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified…”

This Blog has stated the 20th Amendment here and on blogs.  In simple terms

Amendment 20 – Presidential, Congressional Terms. Ratified 1/23/1933.

3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify…

Note; the ‘President elect shall failed to qualify’

After the DNC nomination, prior to and after the General election, and again prior to and after the electorial college, challenges were raised to the courts, representitives, senators, and cases filed, that the citizens of the United States challenged the eligibilty and qualifications of the candidate, President elect Barack Hussein Obama, all the above failed in their sworn duty as elected officials, judicial representitives and with a complacent media allowed an undocumented illegal and unvetted British subject free reign over the citizens and law of the United States.

The grandfather clause that the Founding Fathers placed in the United States Constitution “or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution…” is clear.

For example, George Washington was 57 years of age when he was inaugurated as our first president. But Washington, born and raised in Virginia, had been a British subject during all of his 57-plus years. Hence, as a means of qualifying a class of men for the presidency during the first thirty-five years of our nationhood, while preventing any man with dual or naturalized citizenship from ever serving as president, after a pool of “natural born” men had reached the age of thirty-five… limiting access to those offices only to those born to parents, both of whom were U.S. citizens… the founders included the words, “or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution…”

So the question arises, can the Congress simply ignore its obligation to fully vet those selected as president and vice president-elect by the Electoral College? The answer to that question, in spite of Jack Maskell’s advice to Congress, is a resounding “no.” As Edwin Viera, Jr., Ph.D., J.D., a leading authority on the Constitution, argues, “… the question of Obama’s eligibility vel non is not within the discretion of Congress to skirt or decide as its Members may deem politically or personally expedient… Even by unanimous vote, Congress cannot constitutionally dispense with the requirement that Obama must be ‘a natural born citizen,’ by simply assuming that he is such…”

But what if the members of Congress, on the advice of CRS counsel, fail in that responsibility? Dr. Viera argues that, if no objection is made on the basis that Obama is not a “natural born” citizen… “the matter cannot be said to have been settled to a ‘constitutional sufficiency’ (emphasis added),” because Congress has no power to simply waive the eligibility requirement… Maskell memorandum or no Maskell memorandum

Tammy Bruce gets it right

Tammy Bruce gets it right, America Has Been Elbowed In The Face Since This Freak Got Elected

Tammy talks about Obamacare and all the things that are happening because of it and everything else this freak touches he destroys.

This blog says ‘Thank You’

This blog may appear to be small in the world of the internet, however I would like to say thank you to all the sites and blogs that have used my political posters, research, and breaking news over the past year. Here is a small sampling of those blogs and sites that deserve to be recognized. Thank you!