Rush Limbaugh says there is no ‘PROOF’ that tomorrow is Obama’s birthday

H/T CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.protectourliberty.org/
http://cdrkerchner.wordpre​ss.com/

Lest we forget

The fact is that Obama lied in the past numerous times concerning his past and the latest questionable document only highlights those lies and calls into question any and off of the past of Barack Abdallah Husein Obama.

Just prior to Jan 20th 2009, statements were issued and the media reported that “Dr Rodney West’ was in doctor that delivered the liar. Even the Obama publishing house of lies and deceit; Snopes.com reported that it was Dr Rodney West.

As stated by Barbara Nelson, “I may be the only person left who specifically remembers his birth. His parents are gone, his grandmother is gone, the obstetrician who delivered him is gone,” said Nelson, referring to Dr. Rodney T. West, who died in February at the age of 98. Here’s the story: Nelson was having dinner at the Outrigger Canoe Club on Waikiki Beach with Dr. West, the father of her college friend, Jo-Anne. Making conversation, Nelson turned to Dr. West and said: “‘So, tell me something interesting that happened this week,’” she recalls. His response: “Well, today, Stanley had a baby. Now that’s something to write home about.” The new mother was Stanley (later referred to by her middle name of Ann) Dunham, and the baby was Barack Hussein Obama.

I was one that debunked the Dr Rodney West story as soon as it was published. Dr Rodney West retired in 1956.

Now, David Sinclair is named as doctor. The fact that there has now been two different doctors, are two different claims.  Claims are not facts.

The COLB is listed as ‘files’ and the recent document is ‘Accepted’  This is a huge difference. Again, there is no embossed seal on the document. The SEAL would be the same as the Nordyke twins and not the ‘stylized’ one on the first COLB, which is not the official SEAL from the Hawaiian Department of Health.

The document just released is not only questionable, but why would the State of Hawaii issue a document that was supposed to be printed out on a laser printer, with data that was supposed to be in a database.

If is the original 1961 document, where are the signitures that are below the information boxes on the Nordyke documents. Had this been a real 1961 Birth Certificate it would have been exactly like the Nordyke twins that were born the day after Obama claims to have been born. The document might have been altered AFTER the Nordyke’s were born, but until then it would have been the same document. However we have examples of later documents and they match the Nordyke’s so that eliminates a different document.

The absence of these means that the birth was filed, and was never verified.

There is no Director of Health signiture, there is no Registrar General signiture, there is different local registrar. These are glearing omissions and do not answer anything. Only that a birth was registered. Unverified and unconfirmed.

The image appears to be scanned onto a piece of the security paper [the bend on the left], however I haven’t seen any other relased document from Hawaii with the same anomaly.

Based upon the latest, there needs to be a full congressional investigation.

The White House had to attempt to release something, even Nixon tried to fend off an investigation by releasing a few tapes. That only delayed the full blown house of cards coming down.

Lakin is due to be released, Corsi’s book is due out, one case is being heard on appeal, the Conn social security number is being exposed.

The Obama Nativity fable exposed

The Obama Nativity fable exposed.

After graduating from high school in 1960, Stanley Ann Dunham and her family moved toHonolulu. Dunham soon enrolled at theUniversityofHawaiiat Manoa, this would have been the start of the 1961 – 1962 school year. While attending a Russian language class, Dunham met Barack Obama, Sr., the school’s first African student.  At the age of 23, Obama Sr. had come toHawaiito pursue his education, leaving behind a pregnant wife and infant son in his home town ofNyang’oma KogeloinKenya. Dunham and Obama Sr. were married on the HawaiianislandofMauion February 2, 1961.

In September 1959, Obama Sr. enrolled at theUniversityofHawaiiat Manoa inHonoluluas the university’s first African foreign student. Hence Obama Sr. was inHawaiia year prior then the Dunham’s. In 1959–1960 he lived across the street from the university at the Charles H. Atherton branch of the YMCA at1810 University Avenue; in 1960–1961 he lived two miles southeast of the university at625 11th Avenuein the Kaimuki neighborhood.

In September 1960, Obama Sr. met Ann Dunham in a basic Russian language course at theUniversityofHawaii. Dunham dropped out of theUniversityofHawaiiafter the fall 1960 semester after becoming pregnant, while Obama Sr. continued his education.

Obama Sr. continued his education at theUniversityofHawaiiand in 1961–1962, while Stanley Ann was inSeattleattending theUniversityofWashington. She took classes at theUniversityofWashingtonfrom September 1961 to June 1962, and lived as a single mother in the Capitol Hill neighborhood ofSeattlewith her son while her husband continued his studies inHawaii.

What does the above information mean.

1. Stanley Ann was inHawaiifor ‘only’ one holiday season.
2. During this time, she would have to have been pregnant.
3. Childbirth usually occurs about 38 weeks after conception.
4. From and including: Midnight between Thursday, November 3, 1960 and Friday, November 4, 1960 through To, but not including : Midnight between Thursday, August 3, 1961 and Friday, August 4, 1961 equates to approx 39 weeks.

Is there any photographic evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was pregnant during the time between the fall of 1960 and the summer of 1961?

No, there is no evidence that Stanley Ann was pregnant, but there is photographic evidence suggesting she was not pregnant.

I submit the following photographs as evidence.

Here is a photograph of Stanley Ann reportedly taken by Frank Marshall Davis.

Note the following in the picture;

1. It’s Christmas time
2. Ann has a visible tan line

Here is the second image;

In the picture above;

1. Nylons or stocking observed
2. again the tan line is visible
3. there are Christmas presents

In the third picture below;

The image above shows the

1. Christmas sign, now clearly spelling Christmas
2. again the nylons are visible
3. the tan line is evident

Compare the above toStanleyAnn.

The urban legend ‘Snopes’ has attempted to say that the above is not Ann Dunham but rather another woman named Marcy Moore.

Here is a picture of Marcy Moore

Note that Marcy Moore’s face is heavier, thicker, and she has much larger breasts than the woman in the first set of photos.

Here is a composite of several pictures of Marcy Moore to compare

If the above pictures were taken of Stanley Ann around Christmas time, then the only place that she was known to be around that time, where you could maintain a tan, as evidenced by the tan lines and darker skin color around the arms, shoulders, and face would have been Hawaii. Most people only hung there Christmas decorations after Thanksgiving and were generally taken down right after the New Year. That the presents were unopened would mean that this was before Dec 25^th, but after Thanksgiving. That would mean that at this time Stanley Ann would have been several weeks pregnant.

How many pregnant woman have you ever heard of posing like this?

So if Stanley Ann was not pregnant, then that means that it was not possible for Barack Abdallah Husein Obama to have been born in Aug 1961 inHawaiias his fabled nativity story dictates. It was also during this time she was supposed to be either dating or engaged to Barack Obama Sr.

So who is Obama real birth mother?

Sound impossible?

Read the ‘Adoption of Obama’

Trump: I Have Investigators in Hawaii…’They Cannot Believe What They’re Finding’

DONALD TRUMP: I am saying I want to see the birth certificate. It’s very simple. I want to see the birth certificate. How come his own family doesn’t know which hospital he was born in? How come– forget about birth certificates. Let’s say there’s no birth certificate. How come in the hospital itself, okay? This is one of the…in the hospital itself, there’s no records of his birth. In other words, it doesn’t say how much they paid, where is the doctor, here’s your room bill. You know, all the

MEREDITH VIEIRA: You’ve been privy to all of this to know this?

DONALD TRUMP: Well, I have people that actually have been studying it and they cannot believe what they’re talking.

MEREDITH VIEIRA: You have people now out there searching– I mean, in Hawaii?

DONALD TRUMP: Absolutely. And they cannot believe what they’re finding. And I’m serious–

LINK

Hawaii Gov Can’t Find Obama Birth Certificate – DUH!

Jerome Corsi, WorldNetDaily

Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie suggested in an interview published today that a long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate for Barack Obama may not exist within the vital records maintained by the Hawaii Department of Health.

Abercrombie told the Honolulu Star Advertiser he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii, because the continuing eligibility controversy could hurt the president’s chances of re-election in 2012.

Donalyn Dela Cruz, Abercrombie’s spokeswoman in Honolulu, ignored again today another in a series of repeated requests made by WND for an interview with the governor.

Toward the end of the interview, the newspaper asked Abercrombie: “You stirred up quite a controversy with your comments regarding birthers and your plan to release more information regarding President Barack Obama’s birth certificate. How is that coming?”

In his response, Abercrombie acknowledged the birth certificate issue will have “political implications” for the next presidential election “that we simply cannot have.”

Suggesting he was still intent on producing more birth records on Obama from the Hawaii Department of Health vital records vault, Abercrombie told the newspaper there was a recording of the Obama birth in the state archives that he wants to make public.

Abercrombie did not report to the newspaper that he or the Hawaii Department of Health had found Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigations to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives.

“It was actually written, I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down,” Abercrombie said.

For seemingly the first time, Abercrombie frankly acknowledged that presidential politics motivated his search for Obama birth records, implying that failure to resolve the questions that remain unanswered about the president’s birth and early life may damage his chance for re-election.

Read more: Hawaii governor can’t find Obama birth certificate

Update

Officials in Hawaii have tracked down papers indicating that President Obama was indeed born in their state, according to its new governor.

Gov. Neil Abercrombie, who took office in December, told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser on Tuesday that “our investigation” indicates there is a recording of his birth.

“It actually exists in the archives, written down,” he said.

The new Democratic head of the state vowed when he took office that he would do his best to end the debate over Obama’s birth, which began in 2008 during the presidential campaign.

What does this really means

That record on file can not be a long form Birth Certificate issued by any hospital or birthing facility. Had Obama been born in any hospital or medical facility that would have automatically resulted in a long form Birth Certificate being submitted to the Department of Health. The COLB presented as Obama’s as a valid and authentic document issued by the State of Hawaii and containing data verified by the Department of Health and issued by the State of Hawaii based upon a long form Birth Certificate with recorded data in the index file is ‘NOTHING BUT A FRAUD, AND FORGERY, and a LIE’, as I have maintained since Aug 2008.

The only record that could exist upon Abercrombie’s statement is an affidavit on file and that being such supports Tim Adam’s claim that Hawaii has no Birth Certificate on file for Barack Hussein Obama II.

An affidavit on file with no collaborative evidence supports that Obama is nothing but a fraud and criminal, who claims to have been born in Hawaii. Claims and facts are two realities.

The address in the newspaper announcements point to Orland S. and Thelma S. (Young) Lefforge, who lived at 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy.  There is no other reason why the address was listed as 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy when neither Barack Obama Sr or Stanley Ann resided there. If Madelyn Dunham had registered the birth as some speculate, why would she have used another address, especially the address of a professor of Barack Obama Sr? 

But, why would Orland or Thelma Lefforge use their address in registering a birth of a foreign exchange student from Kenya?

Because the birth took place outside the United States, during the time school was out [summer break], and both Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann did not establish a residence in Hawaii.

UPDATE #2

Pressure was mounting on Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie today amid increasing confusion over whether President Obama was born there.  The Daily Mail UK reports – Link

Abercrombie said on Tuesday that an investigation had unearthed papers proving Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961.

He told Honolulu’s Star-Advertiser: ‘It actually exists in the archives, written down,’ he said.

What is written down? A note from his mommy? A note from Obama Sr’s college professor?

But it became apparent that what had been discovered was an unspecified listing or notation of Obama’s birth that someone had made in the state archives and not a birth certificate.

Not a BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Then what was the COLB information based on? Remember the COLB is supposed to be backed up by an official generated long form BIRTH CERTIFICATE issued by an official or agency responsible for filing the birth with the Department of Health. So what is the COLB presented by Obama based upon, nothing, absolutely nothing but hot air, fictitious, and made up propaganda, and again is nothing but a forgery.

That the COLB that was used to present Obama as a ‘valid candidate’ is a fraudulant document, and that there is no document [long form Birth Certificate] backing it up as the Obamatards continuely like to state as ‘prima facie’ evidence, in a criminal act.

1. False Identification Crime Control Act of 1982
P.L. 97-398
H.R. 6946, December 31, 1982
96 Stat. 2009, Added 18 U.S.C § 1028 & 18 U.S.C. § 1738

The False Identification Crime Control Act of 1982 was passed to prohibit fraud in connection with identification documents. The act added two new statutes, “Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents” (18 U.S.C. § 1028) and “Mailing private identification documents without a disclaimer” (18 U.S.C. § 1738, since repealed by P.L. 106-578). Violators face fines and/or imprisonment for producing or transferring an identification document known it to be false or stolen. The Act also prohibited producing, transferring, or possessing a document-making device with the intent to produce false identification documents. However, the usage of the word “document” indicated that a defendant would have to actually possess the physical identification.

The same violation also covers those that created the fake Kenyan birth certificate.
I would also like to cite the following

18 USC Sec. 1001 01/05/2009

EXPCITE

TITLE 18 – CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I – CRIMES
CHAPTER 47 – FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
Sec. 1001. Statements or entries generally

STATUTE

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully –

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B,
110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

FRAUD

18 USC §1028: Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information
(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section

(1) knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document;
(2) knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority;
(3) knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents;
(4) knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States;
(5) knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document – making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document – making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document – making implement or authentication feature which will be so used;
(6) knowingly possesses an identification document or authentication feature that is or appears to be an identification document or authentication feature of the United States which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without such authority;
(7) knowingly transfers or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law; or
(8) knowingly traffics in false authentication features for use in false identification documents, document – making …

Joey Biden – The Obama court jester

One has to admit ‘The Gaffer’ Joey Biden never fails to amuse whether he’s wasted away singing the theme song to The Villages or creating history ‘when the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television’, to his immortal F-Bomb over healthcare.

In his own mind, a world separate from reality, Joey Biden has created jobs.

  Making fun of Joey Biden doesn’t even seem fair, when the comic relief for the current administration is the Vice-President of the United States. A position that was held with respect till the current ‘Let’s play Government’ administration slithered into office.

One has to ask, why Joey Biden over the more qualified Hillary Clinton as Biden himself stated ”Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States,” Biden said. ”She is qualified to be president of the United States of America. She is easily qualified to be vice president of the United States of America, and quite frankly, might’ve been a better pick than me.”

Some people were concerned that Hillary was a bull-eye for Barack Hussein Obama, the illegal undocumented resident foreigner, that there were too many grassy knolls around the country to be comfortable with Hillary waiting in the wings in second place. In Hillary’s mind, second place is first loser, and even with her excess baggage of eight years of the Clinton scandals, Bill’s extra-marital deviations, gate after gate as they became known for, it was simpler to keep Hillary at bay and Bill out of the public eye. So the last place candidate in the primaries, the real loser becomes the human shield for Barack Hussein. As Joey him self spoke “for OBAMA is not ready to be President.”

Choosing Joey was Hussein’s taunting reminder that should anything happen to the epic failure called ‘Obama’, the Gaffer, the Court Jester, the clown with or without a teleprompter would be the next act on stage. The jester, mucking it up on stage as the stooge that he is, diverting attention away from the real circus act in Washington DC, the three ring act of Congress, Judicial, and Executive  branches of a Constitution Republic to running amok against the American people.

But for Joey Biden, being the jester in the role he was destined to play, and he takes great strides to give it his all. I can hardly wait for his Foster Brooks impersonation, when he realizes that all the world is a stage and he’s the headliner in the act. Too bad the dignity and esteem of an office once held by John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Aaron Burr, and  held in high regards and respect is now a lowly comic relief position.

Kenyan official: Obama born here, “not even a native American.”

During debate over the draft of a new Kenyan constitution, James Orengo, the country’s minister of lands and a member of parliament for the Ugenya constituency, cited America’s election of a Kenyan-born president as an example of what can be accomplished when diverse peoples unite:

The Kenyan lawmaker told the nation’s parliament last month that Barack Obama was born in Africa and is therefore “not even a native American.”

The full quote; “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion. What has killed us here is exclusion; that once Mr. Orengo is President, I know of no other place than Ugenya. That is why we were fighting against these many Presidencies in the past. I hope that Kenya will come of age. This country must come of age. People want freedom and nations want liberation, but countries want independence.” It appears that the Kenyan Government has changed the location of the file.
Here is an updated link:

http://www.bunge.go.ke/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=24&Itemid=

UPDATE: The Kenyan Government is scrubbing this document. I have uploaded it here LINK

The statement is on page 31 of the PDF document. Also when did the United States do away with exclusion? What exclusion? The Natural Born Citizen clause? When was this done?

So who is James Orengo?

James Orengo, (James Jimmy-Jimmy Owadgi Adhiambo Orengo) is a lawyer and former presidential candidate in Kenya. Orengo has since been sworn in as a Minister for Lands in the new Coalition Government formed by the National Accord Act of 2008. As of 2007 he is still the SDP chairman. The party supported Raila Odinga of Orange Democratic Movement at the 2007 general elections. Raila Odinga is the first cousin of Barack Obama.

Additional information and previous posts of Kenyan officials stating Obama is Kenyan

Kenyan Parliament says Obama is Kenyan after the 2008 election

Kenyan Historian says Obama is Kenyan

Michelle Obama syas Kenya is Obama’s ‘HOME COUNTRY’

Obot Lawyer misrepresents the facts – what else is new

A lawyer claiming to know ‘something’ about images is pawning himself as a legitimate authority on the Obama COLB forgery. 

In my previous posts I have indicated that FactCheck #2 the one with out the SEAL is forged. Here is an image that he has posted upon his site.  Here is his claim ‘Seriously, to illustrate just how much Steve shrunk the image to suit his purposes, and how ridiculously small his image is compared to FactCheck’s original photo, here’s a side-by-side comparison of how Steve’s image compares to the size of the original FactCheck image it’s derived from:”

In reality, I resized the image for posting only a reference image only and allowed the readers to judge for themselves by downloading the FactCheck image off FactCheck’s own web-site. So there would no confusion and accusation of altering their image. This way the people could judge for themselves, unlike a Lawyer manipulating  and twisting facts. This blog host only allows for a maximun size of 575 x 478 within the posts. The origional size as mentioned is 2304 x 3072, so his claim of 3% is again showing his lies and ignorance, and stupidity.

Update: An Obot lawyer, who is too stupid and arrogant to realize that the image above, has been resized, by this blog hosting. Has decided to post a comparison image. The image below demonstrates that the FactCheck people used to verify the COLB were not only inexperienced, but were deceptive as well. They were not qualified to even photograph the document and took every effort to decieve anyone looking at it, just like the questionable lawyer. Regardless of the level of focus that the deranged lawyer is pawning, there are no defects from the embossing that are visible in other images. Since he can’t explain that away, he’s throwing a temper tantrum, besides it’s great watching him take the bait. 

However just to prove the lawyer wrong again and show his lies.

Again proving my point that the FactCheck images are large in size and would indicate any defects of embossing as they show clearly all the other defects, lettering, ect.

Only one question needs to be asked; why is every other item and defect detected in this image with the exception of the SEAL. Why is ALL the lettering, including the date indicated, but no evidence of the SEAL.

Or under various filters the same, every letter and defect is dected, with the exception of ANY evidence of an embossed seal, and that is a fact.

Once again, Obot lawyer caught in lies, fraud, and deciet.  But just as important as his attempting to lie about the facts. The fact remains that the embossed seal on the FactCheck forgery does not contain what the State of Hawaii declared what a state issued document contains. There is no way around that. 

Here are some other Birth certificates, in every instance you can detect evidence of the embossing.

So why is the embossing defects clealy visible in other peoples COLB, but not Obama’s and more importantly nowhere on FactCheck #2?

Even the  Nordyke twins’s seal is apparent. On both of them.

Or this on from the back, where not only the seal is visible, but both date and signature stamps also. Contrast increased in seal area.

Here is the same area off the FTS COLB, note that there is no breakage or defects where the FactCheck #3 is.

Every defect, all the lettering, the fake date stamp is visible, but no where is there an indication, breakage, defect of any embossed seal.

See for yourself;

https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/prove-it-to-yourself-so-easy-anyone-can-do-it/

https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/12/08/prove-it-to-yourself-%e2%80%93-so-easy-anyone-can-do-it-pt-2/

https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/prove-it-to-yourself-pt-3/

UPDATE:

Liar Lawyer who misrepresents the facts posted the following

“He also repeats his previous claim (which he pontificated on at length in his original ‘analysis’) that the COLB as posted on Kos should be considered a forgery because you can’t see any bleedthrough from the signature inkstamp. Of course, in another post he treated another COLB that similarly had no signature bleedthrough as unquestionably legitimate, which just serves to remind readers that Steve and other Birther ‘analysts’ pick and choose their evidentiary standards as they go along, without regard for consistency.”

Here is the facts and liar lawyer is smacked down again.

Here is the link to that other post: another post

The COLB that he is referring to is the following

Here are some additional images that prove that liar lawyer not only doesn’t know anything about analysis or documents and that the signature stamp that he claims is not there is not only there, but detectable, unlike the Obama ‘FORGED’ COLB that appeared on the DailyKOS and Fight the Smears that has no signature stamp and the FactCheck ‘FORGERY’ that has no embossed SEAL or signature stamp.

 

The image below with the Embossed SEAL, the Date Stamp, and the signature Stamps clearly visibe. The image was inverted to create a negitive of the original above.

The next image is the same COLB with the same inverted image [negitive] with the exposure increased to highlight the details. Note that the embossed SEAL, the Date stamp, and the signature stamp are even more detailed and pronounced.

in the third image we increase the Zero Point and even more details of the embossed SEAL, Date stamp, and signature stamp are evident.

In the forth image we ‘flip’ the image horizontally to be able to read the correct orientation. The date stamped is FEB 19 2003, the birth was on October 4, 1977, the embossed SEAL is evident and correct per the ‘State of Hawaii – Department of Health’ and the signatures stamp is evident.

Again, unlike Obama’s ‘FORGED’ COLB that has no signature stamp that was posted on the DailyKOS and Fight the Smears, and one version posted on FactCheck. This lawyer misrepresents the facts, and is again proven to be the liar that he is.

Just in time for the Holidays…

WHY IS OBAMA FIGHTING THE LAWSUITS IF HE HAD ALREADY SHOWN HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

As of this date 17 Nov 2009, Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro has spent in excess of $1.8 million to defend lawsuits regarding his eligibility under the United States Constitution. It should be noted that this $1.8 million is NOT his own personal funds, but Obama has been defended by the Dept of Justice at taxpayer expense.

Robert ‘Felix’ Bauer the newly appointed White House Counsel, lead lawyer from Perkins Coie in the eligibility lawsuits, the same lawyer who used threatening tactics and language in the Hollister vs. Soetoro case, the Missouri Truth Squads, and the like, is now Chief legal Counsel to the un-documented illegal alien resident in the Oval Office.

 Maybe Robert Bauer would like to offer the answer on, WHY IS OBAMA FIGHTING THE LAWSUITS IF HE HAD ALREADY SHOWN HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Bauer’s client Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro might like to explain why he claims to have his original Birth Certificate.   As mentioned in “Dreams of My Father” he claims finding his birth certificate.

    On Page 26 of “Dreams of My Father”, Obama writes:

 “I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school,”

 While this brief quote does not state WHAT article it is that Obama found, it does mention that he found it WITH his BIRTH CERTIFICATE. This would have been in the mid 70’s, so this birth certificate would not have been a computer generated document. So where is this original?

The forged COLB versions posted on the Fight the Smears and FactCheck web-sites are in no way what Barack Hussein Obama claimed to discover in that box, along with his vaccination forms. [Which by the way, I still have mine, along with my other documents that have been posted in my video’s on Youtube].

As Alan Keyes stated on CNN, segment included in my ‘Media and the Birthers Pt1 video, Barack Hussein Obama and legal crew are directing you to a photograph on the internet and hearsay statements that would not be accepted as evidence in any court of law.

Remember that a ‘Certification of Live Birth’ only certifies that a birth took place [prima facie as stated on the COLB] not to where or when, same as the Hawaiian newspaper announcements [only that a birth took place, not to where or when].

Herein lays the point, Prima Facie meaning a matter appears to be self-evident from the facts at first glance. The burden of proof when presented based on prima facie is need not be conclusive or irrefutable, the introduction of prima facie evidence is often called ‘making a case or building a case.’  Such evidence [prima facie] might not stand or fall on its own; if an opposing party introduces other evidence or asserts an affirmative defense it can only be reconciled with a full trial.

Now why is it significant that Obama had a real birth certificate – presumably the kind we’re all familiar with that discloses the name of the hospital in which the birth took place, the names of the parents, notes and signatures of attending physicians, etc.?

Based upon the Prime Facie evidence on the forged COLB, one might believe Barack Obama was born in the United States. However, first glance evidence is not sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt where the birth took place. With other evidence that contradicts a Hawaiian birth [Obama’s forged COLB’s, Kenyan Birth certificates, statements from other media sources, newspapers, and relatives], Obama’s defense can only be reconciled with a full trial. Necessitating the secondary evidence on what records Hawaii holds regarding any and all vital records that it maintains on Barack Hussein Obama. To date no trial has taken place.

Below is an image of the ‘data’ fields in the COLB [Certification of Live Birth] and a Birth Certificate.

UPDATE*******

(Nov. 17, 2009) — Yesterday, The Post & Email reported that Mr. Paul Tsukiyama, Director of the Office of Information Practices — the very office overseeing public complaints regarding the Hawaii Department of Health’s refusal to release public documents or information regarding Obama’s alleged vital records kept by that department — resigned quietly on Nov. 6th, and that no one knew where he went.

Yesterday, The American Spectator also spoke about resignations, and speculated about their motives, but these regarding a place on the opposite site of the country: Washington, D.C..

In an editorial by The Washington Prowler, “Obama goes to the Matresses”, we are told that Cassandra Butts,  “a Harvard classmate of Obama’s and one of the administration’s highest-ranking African Americans . . . quietly resigned on Friday, November 6 . . .” .

This resignation preceded that of her immediate superior, Gregory Craig, who left the position of White House Counsel only days ago.

However, what The Washington Prowler writes is more telling in the intrigue and politics behind the Craig resignation and the ascendency of Robert Bauer, whose appointment to Craig’s old position was made last Friday:

“[Bauer] knows where all the bodies are buried, and this indicates that there is something amiss with this White House, or at least someone is nervous about what is going on,” says a former Obama transition team adviser. “You don’t just make these kinds of changes for the sake of rearranging the deck chairs, and not at this time with at least three legislative and policy decisions looming that the Counsel’s office would have been deeply involved in.”

“This doesn’t come close to the ‘Saturday Night Massacre’ in the Nixon days, but it’s pretty damn weird,” says Washington, D.C.-based Democrat lawyer, who has held counsel positions both in the Senate and in previous presidential administrations. “I’m surprised not only that the press seems to be ignoring the fact that two presidential lawyers have left at about the same time, but that no one seems to care that for the first time, I think ever, we have a President’s personal attorney also serving as White House counsel. I don’t care if Bob [Bauer] recuses himself from future personal legal business, this should be troubling to anyone who cares about the Executive Office of the President.”

Here is some additional comments on Robert Bauer. The following is an excerpt from Michelle Malkin’s blog

During the 2008 campaign, Bauer pooh-poohed GOP complaints about voter fraud. While decrying the Republicans’ “fear message,” it was Bauer who was on a fear-inducing crusade – pulling out all legal stops to silence conservative critics of Obama’s ties to the radical Left.

As I’ve noted previously, and in light of Obama’s self-serving praise for political dissent abroad, I note again: It was Bauer who lobbied the Justice Department unsuccessfully last fall to pursue a criminal probe of American Issues Project (AIP), an independent group that sought to run an ad spotlighting Obama’s ties to Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.

It was Bauer and his legal goon squad who attempted to sic the DOJ on GOP donor Harold Simmons and sought his prosecution for funding the ad. In a parallel effort launched the same week as Bauer’s legal efforts, a nonprofit called “Accountable America” spearheaded by a former operative of the Obama-endorsing MoveOn outfit began trolling campaign finance databases and targeting conservative donors with “warnig letters” in a thuggish attempt to depress Republican fundraising.

It was Bauer who tried to bully television stations across the country to compel them to pull the spot. Team Obama then summoned their troops to bombard stations, many of them owned by conservative-leaning Sinclair Communications, with 93,000 e-mails to squelch the commercial.

With Bob “The Silencer” Bauer now working from the inside and Anita “News Commissar” Dunn working from the outside, Obama has a state media police apparatus the Chinese regime could love.