A picture is worth…

In Russia, during the Russian anthem

ObamaAnthemRussia

In America, during the American anthem

ObamaAnthemUS

again in America again

ObamaCrotchSalute2

TREASONERS DON’T SALUTE! THEY SPIT! On Veterans Day, 11 November 2009, during ceremonies at Arlington National Cemetery B. Hussein Obama chose not to salute, or place his hand over his heart, to honor the fallen and the Veterans of our great country.  Barack Obama is a national disgrace to every man and woman that has ever served this country in uniform.

But who does he show honor to…

img86

BRITAIN G20 PALACE

Obama Bows Before Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao

Humpty Obama

The following was posted on the ObamaFile. The responses that were included [here in red] are excellent and deserve to be posted everywhere. I have included additional responses [mine – in green] for some additional comments.

DOJ To Judge:  Dump Ambassador Keyes Lawsuit

The Justice Department is urging a federal court to toss out a lawsuit in which prominent attorney Orly Taitz, who is representing Ambassador Alan Keyes and 200 military members, is challenging Obama’s Constitutional qualifications to be president.

In a motion filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, Calif., government lawyers did not directly rebut the theory Taitz propounds that Obama was not born in Hawaii as he claims and as asserted by Hawaiian officials as well as contemporary newspaper birth notices.  Instead, the federal attorneys argued that the suit is inherently flawed because such disputes can’t be resolved in court and because the dozens of plaintiffs can’t show they are directly injured by Obama’s presence in office.

 The State of Hawaii, has not confirmed they issued a Certification in 2007 or 2008, that contains the Vital record of Barack Obama. Nor has the State of Hawaii or any officials released any information that it contains. Also it begs to ask, why if Barack Obama claims to have released his Birth Certificate, would he spend $1.6 million to keep what he has already released, sealed?

 
“It is clear, from the text of the Constitution, and the relevant statutory law implementing the Constitution’s textual commitments, that challenges to the qualifications of a candidate for President can, in the first instance, be presented to the voting public before the election, and, once the election is over, can be raised as objections as the electoral votes are counted in the Congress,” Assistant United States Attorneys Roger West and David DeJute wrote.  “Therefore, challenges such as those purportedly raised in this case are committed, under the Constitution, to the electors, and to the Legislative branch.” — you don’t say! — so I guess if Obama secured his office through fraud, it’s OK with the Obama JustUs Department — what a shocking surprise!
 So the numerous e-mails, calls, and letters to the Senators and Congressman that went unanswered and ignored, along with no challenge being done at the Electoral College means they completely disregarded the will of the people and committed treason by failing in their sworn duty to uphold and defend the Constitution.  Or the admission that they investigated and by the word of  Snopes.com that he was born in Hawaii. Let alone taking a newspaper announcement as a legal document.

Lieutenant Jason Freese and some other plaintiffs in the case claim they have a real injury because they are serving in the military commander by Obama, the alleged usurper.  However, West and DeJute say that argument is too speculative.

 I wonder where they received their liberal law degrees, that when something is clear and concise as John Jay’s letter to George Washington concerning the Commander of the Army, they become confused and disorientated to the point they babble, stumble, attempt to confuse the issue.

“The injuries alleged by Plaintiff Freese and the other military Plaintiffs herein, are not particularized as to them, but, rather, would be shared by all members of the military and is an inadequate basis on which to establish standing,” the government lawyers wrote. Same old argument — “Standing” — the American People have no right to know who and what Obama is, nor where he comes from — he’s special, you know.

So if no one complains about the rules being violated the game goes on? But here they maintain that if an illegal act was committed, EVERYONE involved has to complain, before anything can be done. Imagine a murder being committed and before the accused can be charged, EVERYONE from the murderer, the victim, the family involved has to agree that something or someone was violated; a wrong was committed, before any actions or charges could be brought forth. If this is the case, how many murderers would agree that they did anything wrong. Amazing!

Another plaintiff in the suit, Alan Keyes, is a three-time, longshot presidential candidate who ran most recently in 2008.  Yet another is Gail Lightfoot, an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate in 2008. The DOJ argues that they were not directly aggrieved by Obama’s election because they never had a mathematical chance of winning.

But an illegal candidate can remain there if the voting public is too ignorant to investigate him? Again, if Barack Obama was found to be ineligible the legal candidates would have been harmed and the outcome could not have been the same. If given the choices without the illegal candidates because they were rightfully removed, who would have the voters selected? So harm was done as the federal campaign finances were available to parties with a certain level of votes.

“The [lawsuit] does not allege, nor could it allege, that any of these Plaintiffs were even on the ballot in enough states in the year 2008 to gain the requisite 270 electoral votes to win the Presidential election,” the motion states. So what?  Since when did winning a political office become a prerequisite for running?

 Being an illegal candidate and disqualified in one State, would have opened the vetting process and allowed the voters to make an informed decision. Questions were raised prior to the conventions and again ignored.  

The Justice Department brief takes a few shots at the wackiness of the birthers, accusing them of trafficking in “innuendo” and advancing “a variety of vaguely-defined claims purportedly related to a hodgepodge of constitutional provisions, civil and criminal statutes, and the Freedom of Information Act.”

 Those arguments notwithstanding, the DOJ lawyers were pretty kind to the birthers and to Taitz, since the filings in the case are replete with spelling errors, among others. Taitz submitted another purported foreign birth certificate for Obama last week in a filing labeled, “Kenian Hospital Birth Certificate for Barack Obama.”

The case is set for a hearing Tuesday morning before Judge David Carter.

This biased report could have been written by Obama, himself.  I have removed many of the pejoratives that Gerstein sprinkled “liberally” throughout the source article.  This Obot doesn’t mention that Taitz is representing Ambassador Allen Keyes, the Independent Party candidate for POTUS, and 200 military officers and non-commissioned officers till halfway through this smear job.

  I guess Gerstein believes that “a three-time, longshot presidential candidate” or “an ultra-longshot vice presidential candidate” is not entitled to justice. These lefties make me want to hurl!  It’s all justice for me, but not for thee, with these people.
 

  Only an Obama JustUs Department, protector of the New Black Panther Party, could claim a plaintiff shouldn’t be heard, shouldn’t receive justice, because, “…they never had a mathematical chance of winning.” Furthermore, what in the hell is Justice Department lawyers doing defending Obama in this suit?  It’s bad enough that Obama has illegally spent at least $600,000 from his campaign funds, to compensate Perkins Coie for legal services, to keep his bona fides from the American People — now he’s got Civil Service lawyers from the JJustUs Department representing him.

The COLB Playing Card

screen1

I have been keeping track of the COLB’s that have been posted on the internet. The lastest entry is the “Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate”. Here is a screen shot of the main page [below] it has embedded images of the Hawaiian and kenyan Templates that were used to create the forgeries.

The Obama COLB’s posted on “FTS” – Fight the Smears and FactCheck were created with the Hawaiian template [embedded] the date stamp Jun 6 – 2007 is clearly visible on the template and the several anomolies, such as the dots that others have mentioned are also visible.

The Kenyan Template is also embedded.

The Lucas Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate also known as the eBay Certificate is not in a singular image, but rather several screenshots. First impression on this one was it was a xeroxed copy of a Hospital Birth Certificate that would have been given to Obama’s parents. Hence the presence of the footprint. This xeroxed copy under higher contract would have resulted in the extra dark lettering and lack of finer details in the footprint itself. The additional information, such as the attending Doctor made this one a bit more convincing. One detail that was still lacking is Barack Obama Sr age, still only refered to as ’25’ with no specific date. This was one clue that initially dropped the believability factor. Without another similar document from the same era and institution, it would be hard to authenticate this one.

However, one thing that all these COLB’s have in common is the ease that a Birth Certification or Certificate can be forged and presented as a real document. Leading to what others have refered to as a ‘breeder’ document.  Where a false or forged Birth Certificate can be used to generate additional documents. Illegal’s have been using this tactis for many years.  Only now has the industry looked at it, and even FoxNews has reported on it.

Again, and as I will state making all the more important for the State of Hawaii to release whatever ‘record’ they have on file for Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Obama aka Barry Dunham aka ?

Here is a word doc with the blank templates. The COLB Playing Card

Here is a link to the full spreadsheet:

FactCheck’s Forged Barack Obama COLB

  The “FactCheck” COLB’s has been an issue since they were posted. In an attempt to backup the original forgery posted on “Fight the Smears”, there are glaring issues with both the “FactCheck” Colb’s. I reference that there are two separate and individual documents as one clearly shows an embossed SEAL while the other does not. The one that does contain an embossed SEAL, however is not an official SEAL from the State of Hawaii – Department of Health, and hence the document itself is already in question.

Here in an attempt to identify an additional ink markings from the Statement and Signature Stamp applied to the back of an authentic Certificate from the Vital Records Department, I will be using the “FactCheck” images and developing a composite image based on several layers, and seeing if any additional indications can be detected.

First let us provide an over-view of the images posted on FactCheck.

 FCComposite

FactCheck posted nine (9) images none of which are head-on and provide clear reference points. If you look at the image in the upper right hand of the composite, you will notice one glaring issue. The area where there should be an embossed SEAL is shaded by the arm of the person taking the picture. Other images are similarly deceptive in angle or contrast.

However their attempt, they failed to resolve the issue of Obama’s Certification of Live Birth.

Issue #1. There are two separate COLB’s posted. As noted before one COLB has an embossed SEAL and the other does not.

Below are the images of the COLB’s

Here is the COLB with an embossed SEAl. The image has been resized and rotated to the correct orientation. We will call this COLB 1 for reference.

 birth_certificate_2Resized

Now the second COLB without the embossed SEAL. We will call this COLB 2 for reference.

 birth_certificate_3Resized

Let’s examine individual close-ups of the area and.

Here is COLB 1 cropped with the SEAL clearly visible and measurements in the area indicating the location of the embossed SEAL from points on the COLB that can be identified between different documents. I have increased the contrast of the image.

 COLB1Closeup

Now let’s look at the same area on the second COLB [COLB 2]

First let’s increase the brightness of the image to increase the light in the shaded area of the arm.

 birth_certificate_3NOSEAL2Resized

Now let’s crop into the area of where the SEAL should be. Again using the same area as COLB 1, below is the image of what we see. NOTHING there.

 COLB2Closeup2

Notice that the Rattan Security lines are CLEARLY visible and solid. No breakage is seen. I then altered the image using the Hue and Saturation settings to change the coloring to be able to bring out the lines.

 COLB2Closeup1

Again, using the same orientation points that we did for COLB 1, you can clearly see that there is NO line breakage indicating an embossed SEAL was ever applied to the document.  This is a high resolution image, here are is the info on both images.

 picinfo

Now let us turn our attention to the date stamp in the FactCheck COLB 1. Here again we will use the original COLB posted by Barack Obama on ‘Fight the Smears’ and compare it to COLB 1 on FactCheck.

Below is the “Date Stamp of the Barack Obama COLB”

 2

 We have adjusted the Hue and Saturation for bleed-through on the Date Stamp.

6

Notice that there is NO additional ink markings within the entire region.

 Since we have detected NO additional ink markings in the region, we will use the original image as our reference. We then took the Official stamp off another “FactCheck” image and super-imposed onto this image.

 

 1

Note how we have aligned the overlay to the Date stamp, all reference lines are now based on this orientation. Below is a minor off-set to show that the Date is actually in fact lined up.

 7

 

From this image we will now use the FactCheck image. Image 8 for reference. We will create a transparent image of the background leaving the Black border and lettering to orient this image to the original one above.

 FC1

And another from FactCheck. This is resized to show the entire image here.The next image that we will use is the one below. We will again, create a transparent background leaving the Date, statement, and the signature, as to align them with the original.

 birth_certificate_9Resized

Now using the “State” letters as our reference point. Notice the large area under it.

Using the third image above, reposted here, notice that the “State” letters are inside the Border in the word ‘INVALIDATE’

 1

Now, lets refer to the following image and see how far the bottom of the image is to the letters “State” I have added the Blue lines as a reference guide.

 Meas2

 

We will add the additional references. Here I will use the Letter ‘S’ from the word State and to the edge of the image there is space for at least four (4) additional S’s.

 M2RS

 

We will now apply the above Image 8 to the original. The one that we removed the Ratan Background [Security feature – see my blog posting on Security Features], leaving the Black border and lettering. Note that the alignment can be seen and the I in the word INVALIDATE shows the separation between the original image and the overlay.

 8

 We will now use the layering tool to move this layer back one and then have the Date/Signature overlay on the top. Note that all are aligned very nicely.

 9

 Now we even apply the second signature overlay to show that they do indeed line up. Notice that the “State” in the ‘INVALIDATE lines up correctly along with the words on all the other lines. All aligned off the “Jun -6 2007’ date.

 10

 I have added the additional “S’s” to the overlay in an attempt to find the location to the bottom of the “FactCheck” COLB. As FactCheck did NOT photograph the entire back like they did for the two separate COLB’s they posted. IE: One COLB with a SEAL and the other without a SEAL. Hence two separate COLB’s. “FactCheck” only posted close-ups of the stamp area with any orientation points.

 12

 

 There is NO additional ink bleed through in the ENTIRE area. It appears that the original “JUN – 6 2007” Date stamp was applied to the top of the ‘FactCheck” COLB and was not applied on the back. On the front, as if it was printed when the COLB was printed.

However with the absence of any other ink bleed through and being able to identify WHERE the additional lettering from the Statement/Signature Stamp if any impression was available.

With all these overlays and switching back and forth under the layering tool. No indications were detected. No increase of the brightness/contrast or hue and saturation brought out any additional markings or indications that any ink or impressions were applied to the back of ‘either’ document. However there is clear indication that an image of the date ‘Jun 6- 2007’ was copied and applied to the original COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ and this was transferred to the FactCheck document when it was printed out. 

 2

 

My original conclusion stands, that the Date on the COLB was printed on the top when the document was created, by printing out the ‘Fight the Smears’ COLB and then attempting to apply an embossed seal to the document in an attempt to produce a forged Birth Certification. However they produced two completely different documents one with a SEAL and the other without one. I believe they noticed that during the process that the document was missing a SEAL, applied one, and did not catch the image without one till it was too late and already posted.

 They are forgeries, plain and simple.

Forgery #1 – The COLB posted on ‘Fight the Smears’ – No Stamp, No Seal, evidence of tampering and forgery. Sandra Ramsey Lines, Ron Polirak, and myself, among others.

Forgery #2 – FactCheck – Two different COLB’s one with a SEAL, however NOT an Official State of Hawaii Department of Health SEAL

Forgery #3 – FactCheck – COLB without a SEAL, image of COLB being held up. High resolution and NO indicating of a SEAL.

So how can there be three versions of a document that Hawaii NEVER issued?

The Adoption of Obama

The Adoption of Obama

 Like with ‘anything’ regarding the past of Obama, nothing should be taken for granted or on face value. Both of his books by Obama’s own words can NOT be taken literally. They are nothing more then a facade, a mask of the true background and nature of Barack Obama, created to produce the Obama effect on whomever wants to believe in unicorns and forest fairies.

 

Currently Obama refuses to release any documents regarding his past. We are to except what is written as fact, regardless if it conflicts with, or when the document is changed by necessity.

 Let us reason why Obama refuses to show where he was born.  Obama claims to have been born at the Kapi’olani Medical Center Hospital, then within months claims to have been born in Queens Hospital.

Claiming and facts are different.  Fact is that both hospitals fail to claim Barack Obama being born there as do other medical centers that have been contacted by researchers.

 We know from several separate statements made by his Grandmother Sarah that the following are known.

  1. Obama was born in Kenya
  2. She [Grandmother Sarah] was present at his birth

 Now, the remarks of one person might be questioned. But even back in the beginning of his campaign ads with “Kenyan-Born” crept up overseas, and the recent trip to Ghana again was riddled with “Returning to his Continent of Birth” and news video of people stating that Obama was Kenyan.

 But again, another ‘UNKNOWN’ must be included. Who was Barack Obama’s birth mother?

Just like with and I quote ‘EVERYTHING’ that is known and factual; the facts go so far and then drop off.  Again, notice the above, Obama was born in Kenya and she was there, but it stops at a critical point, who was his mother.

 Recently Barack Obama stated that he was a few months old when the Bay of Pigs invasion happened. A slip of the tongue or a genuine remark. Let’s dissect that statement with known facts. The Bay of Pigs invasion took place on April 1961. Obama claims to have been born on Aug 4th 1961, four months after the event. What if in reality Obama was born prior to April 1961.

“Obama openly admits he is offering a psychological autobiography, not a chronological one.  The dialogue is an ‘approximation’ . . . the characters are ‘composites’ … ‘events appear out of precise chronology.'”

Let’s take another time period that Obama has placed relevance in, Nov 1960. The time period that Obama ‘CLAIMS’ his parents meet. Combine that with the statement from Grandma Sarah and you have the picture a little more clearly.

 Obama was dumped on Stanley Ann and Obama Sr took off to parts unknown and elsewhere like Harvard.

 Well if Stanley Ann Durham was NOT his mother then who was/is?

 First off, the gloves come off. We have always assumed that Stanley Ann was his mother. What if the reason Obama refuses to release his ‘RECORD’ that Hawaii has on files, is that it is NOT a Birth record, but an adoption record?

 Imagine that Obama finds his Birth Certificate in the box as described in “Dreams of My Father” and discovers that whom he thought was his mother WASN’T. Think of the resentment, the betrayal. when he’s old enough he starts using his ‘African’ name instead of his whitey name. He then goes on his travel of discovery, back to Africa to find his roots, To find his REAL mother, only Granny Sarah confirms the story. then to Indonesia to confront his mother and onto Pakistan where the real Barry finds solstice in the breeding hatred of Islam, and back to the US, and he uses the name Obama again. Dropping Soetoro as the anger against his mother is festering and now he’s Barack Obama ONLY. Created by paper once before, he re-creates himself again by using ‘HIS’ name.

 

 It also explains his white race hatred, esp. the teachings of Black theology in Wright’s Church. His non-advertising his ‘mother’s race’

 From Dreams of My Father: ‘I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.’

 From Dreams of My Father: ‘I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.’

 From Dreams of My Father: ‘There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.’

 From Dreams of My Father: ‘It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.’

From Dreams of My Father: ‘I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.’

 From Audacity of Hope: ‘I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.’

 This is a perverse/warped/twisted individual outlook on his own biological mother is nothing less then alarming! It only adds to the mounting evidence that Stanley Ann was NOT his birth mother and the resentment that Barack Obama fostered because of the lies that were told to him. Stanley Ann became the evil step-mother in Cinderella and Obama’s used that fantasy to foster the hatred not only towards his mother, but also to his mother’s race.   

 This also clears up, the Dr Rodney West story that was floated around just prior to the inauguration. Dr Rodney West, whom the Obots touted as the Dr who first spanked Obama NEVER came forward and said that he delivered him. When he [Dr Rodney West] was still alive during the beginning of the campaign no mention was ever made.  Dr Rodney West would also have all his patient records as an infant and possibly for his mother. SO we have the Dr, who died last year who like the hospital has NEVER stepped forward and confirmed ANYTHING.

 And lastly the documents that Kenya has stated they have sealed are explained. The birth certificate that was generated by law when Barack Obama was born in Kenya has his real birth’s mother name and that is why they have protected it from seeing the light of day, as it contains a name other then Stanley Ann Obama.

 Here are the official State of Hawaii guidelines concerning adoption records.

 http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0020_0005.htm

  §338-20.5  Adoption; foreign born persons.  (a)  The department of health shall establish a Hawaii certificate of birth for a person born in a foreign country and for whom a final decree of adoption has been entered in a court of competent jurisdiction in Hawaii, when it receives the following:

      (1)  A properly certified copy of the adoption decree, or certified abstract thereof on a form approved by the department; and

      (2)  A copy of any investigatory report and recommendation which may have been prepared by the director of social services; and

      (3)  A report on a form to be approved by the department of health setting forth the following:

          (A)  Date of assumption of custody;

          (B)  Sex;

          (C)  Color or race;

          (D)  Approximate age of child;

          (E)  Name and address of the person or persons adopting said child;

          (F)  Name given to child by adoptive parent or parents;

          (G)    True or probable country of birth.

 Or this;

 http://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/HRS_0338-0021.htm

     §338-21  Children born to parents not married to each other.  (a)  All children born to parents not married to each other, irrespective of the marriage of either natural parent to another, (1) on the marriage of the natural parents with each other, (2) on the voluntary, written acknowledgements of paternity under oath signed by the natural father and the natural mother, or (3) on establishment of the parent and child relationship under chapter 584, are entitled to the same rights as those born to parents married to each other and shall take the name so stipulated by their parents or, if the parents do not agree on the name, shall take the name specified by a court of competent jurisdiction to be the name that is in the best interests of the child.  The original certificate of birth shall contain the name so stipulated.  The child or children or the parents thereof may petition the department of health to issue a new original certificate of birth, and not a duplicate of the original certificate that has been amended, altered, or modified, in the new name of the child, and the department shall issue the new original certificate of birth.  As used in this section “name” includes the first name, middle name, or last name.

     (b)  The evidence upon which the new original certificate is made, and the superseded original certificate shall be sealed and filed and may be opened only upon order of a court of record.

     (c)  If the child’s natural parents marry each other and desire to change the child’s name, the child’s name may be changed and a new original certificate of birth prepared.

    (d)  Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the power of the courts to order the department to prepare new certificates of birth under section 584-23. [L 1949, c 327, §25; RL 1955, §57-24; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 6, §2; HRS §338-21; am L 1975, c 66, §2(4); am L 1980, c 153, §5; am L 1983, c 65, §2; am L 1986, c 287, §1; am L 1987, c 100, §2; am L 1988, c 141, §27; am L 1993, c 131, §3]

           The true or probable country of birth shall be known as the place of birth, and the date of birth shall be determined by approximation.  This report shall constitute an original certificate of birth; and

 (4)     A request that a new certificate of birth be established.

 Attorney General Opinions

  Department of health’s preparation of a new birth certificate pursuant to paternity orders.  Att. Gen. Op. 87-6.

 Case Notes

   Legitimacy or illegitimacy fixed at birth and cannot be changed by subsequent legislation.  3 H. 459; 4 H. 548.  Prior to amendment of Act 71, L 1907, children of adulterous intercourse not legitimated by subsequent marriage of parents.  4 H. 292; 17 H. 45, 415, aff’d 210 U.S. 149.  Legitimation by subsequent marriage.  29 H. 258, aff’d 16 F.2d 273.

   Child begotten and born out of wedlock even though legitimated by statute on marriage of parents, is not “lawfully begotten child” within meaning of will.  14 H. 271.

   Presumption of legitimacy is not conclusive, but rebuttable.  30 H. 574.  Evidence to rebut presumption.  49 H. 273, 414 P.2d 925.

   Effect of legitimation on necessity of father’s consent to adoption of child.  52 H. 395, 477 P.2d 780.

 In short the ‘Adoption of  Obama’ into the marriage of Obama/Durham created on paper, the “Aug 4th 1961 in Hawaii” existence of the one known as “Barack Hussein Obama” born of a foreign and British ‘subject’ Barack Obama Sr and others unknown in Kenya.  This fulfills the puzzle in a complete circle. But it also mandates that as long as Barack Hussein Obama can confuse and claim to be born in Hawaii or at least to a US Citizen mother, then a certain number of the public will be slumbered into believing a ‘Native’ Citizen is eligible for the Presidency, where as a foreign born, with foreign parents leaves no doubt that Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro aka Barry Durham aka Barry Obama is exactly who he ‘CLAIMS’ he is, at the moment he’s claiming it, but in no way a ‘Natural Born’ Citizen as required by the United States Constitution.

Obama’s Lawyers caught in lies

Last week I was on Plains Radio, discusssing the Obama Birth Certificate fraud and some Obama lawyers came on and decided to spread lies. However they were caught. Here is a snipet of the Plains Radio chat room on Friday night;
Ed_Hale: dang no way – after the crap i took for 2 days about having the Obots on here – they an’t coming back
Jessie3: Charlene, say it like it is, we want to kick a$$
LUGNUT96: lol Ed
charlene: Ed,  Oh Come On.. Just For A Few
TexGirl: any other ladies want a piece of jimbot?
charlene: Give Us The Chance To Kick His Behind
LUGNUT96: yes
Ed_Hale:  NO No No No No
LUGNUT96: lol
KatieIN: Ed, thanks for listening to the voice of plains radio folks
charlene: And Send A Message To Barry
LUGNUT96: Yes Ed
TexGirl: kick his butt
zulu: No
LUGNUT96: lol
LUGNUT96: yes
TexGirl: we’ll gang up on him
charlene: ed, your no fun   
TexGirl: zulu and linda too?  anybody else?
Ed_Hale: Beside Jim Sent Me A Eamil Where They Surrender To Us – They Could Not Take Any More Of Us Catchign Them In Lies
lindastarr: Gang Bang Jimbot
charlene: Ed,  but it woudn’t be a question and answer session
Jessie3: really Ed, we got to them?
charlene: lol
TexGirl: Patriot-bang jimbot
X-MEN: Hey for you know he could be in here right now.
charlene: it would be a kick behind
harriet: Give him the information to send a letter to Judge Schneider will do more good.
Ed_Hale: Yes after Ken and Sc took them apart jim sent me a email saying they would not be back
TexGirl: i want a piece of jimbot … that would make my day
Jessie3: that was nice of him Ed. they have been ringing our chimes for too long and we beat em
TexGirl: i would tear him up and spit him out
charlene: look what happened,  Plaines Radio created a monster
Ed_Hale: He knows that Texgirl
LUGNUT96: Have Ken And Sc get jimbot again Ed
Leecamp: hope so robbie
TexGirl: those obot chicks needed a good swift kick in their butts
charlene: Ed..  thanks a lot and it was Your  program that created a monster ( me) lol
KC4TX: Ed they never counted on so many smart people
Ed_Hale: yes they thought all of you were like me – a dumb redneck Texan
TexGirl: fakejimbot?
LUGNUT96: loll Ed
charlene: Jessie all of us can
charlene: and ed your far from dumb..
LUGNUT96: they will be back and wwe will be ready
booklady: They’re mistake, Ed, is that you may have an accent, but dumb….no.
Pmb09 has left.
Lanie: Ed knows they wouldn’t have a chance with us.
Robbie: fakejimbot called in impersonating jimbot and we saw right through him and tore him a new a-hole.
swift: no its barry
TexGirl: we always know the ‘real’ jimbot … he’s always drunk   
harriet: charlene: there are more of us than them.
LUGNUT96: lol pof
Ed_Hale: 4 days in a row we had our show highligthed in a email – last one was “obama lawyer get their butts handed to them by 2 lay people on Plains Radio”
Robbie: Texgirl, fakejimbot sounded just like jimbot, so we think it was him and sent him out of here crying!
Jessie3: Rush said today that Bo was usurping America
Ed_Hale: and then it had the link to the archives
TexGirl: robbie … oh that is sweet …that y’all had him cryin like a baby   
Ed_Hale: that is one reson we have gotten so many new listeners
LUGNUT96: yees linda
mominva: lol X!!!!!!!!!
Robbie: i know it was jimbot because he always sounds like he is taking a sip of something and we know it is Jack Daniels.
charlene: Xmen lol
lindastarr: well I helped bring new people in too Ed
Jessie3: did you hear it lee?
LUGNUT96: well then Ed that is why we want Jimbot Back Her  then
TexGirl: jack daniels laced with koolaid
Ed_Hale: Eeveryone was so suprised that Ken and Sc were so knowldgeable on Obama
Lanie: I think they are scared to come back anay.
chuger: The people in our government today are the sons and daughtes of the radicals and revolutionaries from the 60’s and 70’s that burned and terrorized our country. They are classic Marxist, fascist National Socialist  evil people.
TexGirl: oh …well…. ken and Sc are extremely knowlegable
Lanie: anyway
Leecamp: ken and Sc rock!!!
X-MEN: I’m telling you guys what we’ve done is making an impact. My friend is a harcore Obot lover and now he calls him Hitler.
pof: I didnt see them chanhe their mind Ed
Ed_Hale: so I can get yelled at by some of the folks here Lug
LUGNUT96: Ed We Need To Send Them 2 out and on the news channels lol
Jessie3: daughter well great grand daughter of the revolution
TexGirl: my heros … ken and Sc 
TexGirl: and Ralph and Carmen 
charlene: Yes Ken and Sc are the best
zulu: good x
SC: Thanks lug
LUGNUT96: Yes Ed Lol
kaks: Yes, Ken and Sc need to go to the news channels.
TexGirl: and Ed and Caren 
LUGNUT96: hah
GHOSTfighter has joined.
LUGNUT96: welcome Sc
TexGirl: and hummingbird
X-MEN: He is not the only one, others are seeing it..
KC4TX: hi Ghost
booklady: Wb, ghostie!
Leecamp: Obama is not president…never can be.
Lanie: Obama is showing them himself Ed but now they are believing what we say.

Now I recieved the following e-mail;

> —– Forwarded Message —–
> From: “Unalienable Rights” <keeprrights@gmail.com>
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:22:46 AM (GMT-0600) America/Chicago
> Subject: WOW! Obot Lawyers Torn Apaprt — AND– The BIG GUY –VP Procter & Gamble is TICKED at the RAT/USURPER/ “SIAP”
>
> Keep feeding strong resentments to the Fed and State reps at all levels to get them to move on out NOW with removing the RAT/USURPER/ “SIAP” from OUR TRUE AMERICANS’ HOUSE.
>
> Also, hear the Obots support lawyers get their rear ends tore out by l ayman researchers here at a down to earth news source called Plains Radio.

The other night the Obot lawyers were attempting to tell people that the STATE of Hawaii ONLY releases the abbreviated or “Short Form”. I told them that this was a lie.
They then attempted to say that all the data and records were transfered to a database and that was all they had.

I decided to re-confirm with the State of Hawaii and here is their reply.

HawaiiReply2Crop

Full Size

I decided to inquire further and dig deeper, here again is the State of Hawaii’s reply.

HawaiiReply3Crop

Full Size

Now, here is WHAT is important.

1. The State of Hawaii, still maintains ALL the origional records.

2. The Long Form Birth Certificates are still available, with a Judges Order!

3. The Obot lawyers have been caught in another Lie, and attempting not only divert attention but out and out MIS-REPRESENT facts to the American public.

Other lies are were that the “Natural Born Citizen” clause was amended. Please see here for a detail explaination: https://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/natural-born-confusion-only-for-obama-supporters/

 

Obama IS a foreign national and Kenya knows it

The following was obtained from the following site.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9606845/Kenyan-National-Assembly-Wednesday-5th-November-2008-51108A

 Updated working link; http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/Tenth%20Parl%201st%20Session/Hansard/5.11.08A.pdf

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT

Wednesday, 5th November, 2008

The House met at 9.00 a.m.

Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama’s win in the United States of America (USA), the House is crippled.

Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request!    *****[note – “having a Kenyan ruling the USA”!]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order, Mr. Vice-President! We are citizens of the Republic of Kenya! This is a supreme institution of this country. Our responsibility is to our country, first and foremost.

We are not citizens of the USA! Much as we appreciate and we are all happy; nonetheless we are a country ourselves.

So, it is not an excuse for a Minister to be away from his own Parliament, because he is celebrating the victory of another presidential candidate in another country.

The Assistant Minister for Water and Irrigation (Mr. Kiunjuri): Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, as you can see, people are really celebrating.

However, I am wondering whether the Americans have not reported to work and yet it is their victory.

I am also hoping that there will be no homecoming for Obama. If there is one, the Leader of Government Business should alert us in good time so that we can set up a committee to organize for his homecoming.  *[note – Obama having a Homecoming to Kenya!]

Ms. Odhiambo:Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the President-elect, Mr. Obama, is a son of the soil of this country.

*[note – Obama is soil of Kenya – birthright from his father]

Mr. Deputy Speaker: President-elect has not been sworn-in yet. The election of President-elect Obama is of utmost national importance to the United States of America. Ms. Odhiambo, you are a lawyer. You had better be very careful where you transgress between watching your own sovereignty and what can be
interpreted in some quarters as some form of treason
(Ed. note: the threat of “treason” is not directed to Ms Odhiamdo personally, but rather concern over how Obama’s “former” Kenyan Citizenship may be viewed by outsiders)

 Mr. Affey: … For the first time, we have a leader of a great country in this world whose blood is Kenyan.

*[Note – Blood is Kenyan – again Bloodright Citizenship]

COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHAIR CONGRATULATORY MESSAGE TO PRESIDENT-ELECT BARRACK OBAMA

Hon. Members, as you may be aware, the people of the United States of America have just had a historic election where the son of this soil, Barrack Hussein Obama, has been elected the 44th President of the United States of America…

*[Note- again – of the soil]

The Vice-President and Minister forHome Affairs (Mr. Musyoka):
As we do, as you said from the Chair, this is a sovereign country. We know we can learn a lot.

To be able to support that blood relation, I think we owe it to ourselves to make sure that we have a peaceful country as Kenyans; a country that will uphold the true principles of the rule of law, democracy and tolerance between ourselves

At the beginning of this year, Senator Barrack Obama called me at midnight and told me: “Mr. Vice President, could you make sure you sort out this problem?” I want to assure him that the problem has since been sorted out.

*[Note- What problem needed to be sorted out?, that he was born there?] 

The Assistant Minister for Higher Education, Science and Technology (Dr. Mwiria):…

Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to take this opportunity to also congratulate Barrack Obama on his victory and also say that even as we look at that victory say it is possible, it is only possible because there are structures in place in the US that make it possible for any potential candidate to win, irrespective of whether they have a lot of money which they have gotten legally or illegally, they are from a different ethnic group and how old they are.

*[Note – illegal money contributed to the campaign of Barack Obama!]

 Mr. Chanzu:I highly congratulate Obama and salute Americans, Black, White and other races, for what they have done in showing the world that a leader can come from any community. I also want to congratulate Kenyans for the support they have shown. It showed the Americans that we were supporting our own.
*[Note- supporting THEIR own!]

Mr. Ethuro: … Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, we have done it! That is why I like this Motion coming at this time of Obama – yes we can! We did it with the Parliamentary Service Commission. We did it with the Leader of the Official Opposition. We are doing it
with the Official Opposition Bill. We are doing it with the establishment of the Budget Office and we are doing it with the Cabinet size! Yes we can!
*[Note – the same montra “YES WE CAN”]

Obama is an illegal alien in the United States, who has used forged documents to gain employment in this country!

Natural Born Citizen legally defined

There has been much debate as to whether the term “Natural Born Citizen” has ever been legally defined or will some court have to finally define it, such as the Supreme Court of the United States.  The term “Natural Born Citizen” is a requirement for only two positions within our government, President and Vice-President.  What did the Founding Father’s and Framers of the United States Constitution mean to do or accomplish by placing this requirement for the highest office?

First off, let us look at what the Framer’s used as a guide.

The Founding Fathers of the United States, used Vattel’s Laws of Nations as their guide and reference to meanings and definitions within our Constitution. 

The myth that the founding of American Republic was based on the philosophy of John Locke could only have been maintained, because the history of Leibniz’s influence was suppressed. The American Revolution was, in fact, a battle against the philosophy of Locke and the English utilitarians. Key to this struggle, was the work of the Eighteenth-century jurist, Emmerich de Vattel, whose widely read text, The Law of Nations, guided the framing of the United States as the world’s first constitutional republic. Vattel had challenged the most basic axioms of the Venetian party, which had taken over England before the time of the American Revolution, and it was from Vattel’s The Law of Nations, more than anywhere else, that America’s founders learned the Leibnizian natural law, which became the basis for the American System.

Benjamin Franklin’s (a signer of our Constitution) letter to Charles W.F. Dumas, December 1775
“I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly, that copy which I kept (after depositing one in our own public library here, and send the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed) has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author”?

I am sure most reading this will know who Benjamin Franklin was. However one reference will not squell the unbelief that Vattel’s Laws of Nations, is not clear enough. So do a search on Laws of Nations and you will get HUNDREDS of responses. http://rs6.loc.gov/ammem/hlawquery.html This from the Library of Congress.  Another excellent post is the following; The concept of judicial review, which Hamilton had championed in Rutgers v. Waddington, was included in the U.S. Constitution. In {The Federalist Papers,} No. 78, “The Judges as Guardians of the Constitution,” circulated as part of the debate over the new Constitution, Hamilton developed a conception of constitutional law which was coherent with Vattel’s conception. Hamilton stated that it is a “fundamental principle of republican government, which admits the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution, whenever they find it inconsistent with their happiness.” However, the Constitution can only be changed by the nation as a whole, and not by the temporary passions of the majority or by the legislature. Both to protect the Constitution, but also to ensure just enforcement of the law, the independence of the judiciary from the legislature and the executive branch is essential. The judiciary must be the guardians of the Constitution, to ensure that all legislative decisions are coherent with it. This idea championed by Hamilton, that the courts ensured that the Executive and Legislative branches followed the Constitution, was later established as a principle of American jurisprudence by Chief Justice John Marshall

Again proving the Constitution, it’s meaning, it’s wording , and it’s definitions were clearly a result of being referenced to Vattel’s Laws of Nations. So what does the Laws of Nations say about a “Natural Born Citizen”?

Vattel in Bk 1 Sec 212, states the following. 

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

As I have stated before and will state here again.  Barack Obama, he has admitted being a British citizen at birth. From his own web-site,  “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”

How can a British subject at birth, be free from any foreign influence as described by John Jay in the following; 

The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 [Farrand’s Records, Volume 3]
LXVIII. John Jay to George Washington.3
[Note 3: 3 Documentary History of the Constitution, IV, 237.]
New York 25 July 1787

Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.

Again Alexander Hamilton (a signer of our Constitution) in the Gazette of the United States, published in Philadelphia, on June 29, 1793 “The second article of the Constitution of the United States, section first, establishes this general proposition, that “the EXECUTIVE POWER shall be vested in a President of the United States of America…The executive is charged with the execution of all laws, the law of nations, as well as the municipal law, by which the former are recognized and adopted.”

“The Law of Nations” provides the Constitutional definition of a “natural born citizen, historical records reveal that Vattel’s work was quoted at the Federal Constitutional Convention of 1787, various State Constitutional Conventions, and was also referenced in a 1785 letter by John Jay regarding a diplomatic matter.

Should any court finally decide that there IS ample evidence that Barack Obama is not qualified to hold the Office of the President of the United States, they will have to rely on Vattel as the defining definition and argument, and stare reality in the face that not only is Barack Obama unqualified, but that he is not even a US Citizen.

As a final note concerning the Supreme Court and Laws of Nations, I direct you to the following;

The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution [Elliot’s Debates, Volume 3]
Saturday, June 21, 1788.

Page 564

There is to be one Supreme Court–for chancery, admiralty, common pleas, and exchequer, (which great eases are left in England to four great, courts,) to which are added criminal jurisdiction, and all cases depending on the law of nations–a most extensive jurisdiction. This court has more power than any court under heaven. One set of judges ought not to have this power–and judges, particular, who have temptation always before their eyes. The court thus organized are to execute laws made by thirteen nations, dissimilar in their customs, manners, laws, and interests. If we advert to the customs of these different sovereignties, we shall find them repugnant and dissimilar. Yet they are all forced to unite and concur in making these laws. They are to form them on one principle, and on one idea, whether the civil law, common law, or law of nations. The gentleman was driven, the other day, to the expedient of acknowledging the necessity of having thirteen different tax laws. This destroys the principle, that he who lays a tax should feel it and bear his proportion of it. This has not been answered: it will involve consequences so absurd, that, I presume, they will not attempt to make thirteen different codes. They will be obliged to make one code. How will they make one code, without being contradictory to some of the laws of the different states?

Allow me to make one more reference;

The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution [Elliot’s Debates, Volume 4]
Seamen’s Bill.–For the Regulation of Seamen on Board the Public Vessels, and in the Merchant Service of the United States.
House of Representatives, February, 1813.

Mr. SEYBERT. The Constitution of the United States declares, Congress shall have power “to establish a uniform rule of naturalization, and uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies, throughout the United States.” Sir, the rule only relates to the mode; it is only operative during the nascent state of the political conversion, and it ceases to have effect the moment after the process has been completed. Your Constitution only recognizes the highest grade of citizenship that can be conferred. The alien is thus made a native, as it were, and is fully vested with every eight and privilege attached to the native, with the exception impressed on the Constitution Your statutes cannot deprive any particular species of citizens of the right of personal liberty, or the locomotive faculty, because the Constitution does not characterize the citizens of the United states as native and naturalized. Our great family is composed of a class of men forming a single genus, who, to all intents and purposes, are equal, except in the instance specified–that of not being eligible to the presidency of the United States. The only exception to the rule is expressed in the Constitution. If other exceptions had been contemplated by the framers of that instrument, they would also have been expressed. None other having been expressed, he said, it followed that your legislative acts could not make individual exceptions touching the occupation of a citizen. All freemen, citizens of the United States, may pursue their happiness in any manner and in any situation they please, provided they do not violate the rights of others. You cannot deny to any portion of your citizens, who desire to plough the deep, the right to do so, whilst you permit another portion of them the enjoyment of that right.

 

Mr. ARCHER. The framers of our Constitution did not intend to confine Congress to the technical meaning of the word naturalization, in the exercise of that power–the more especially when the comprehensive word rule was made use of. The principle upon which the power was to be exercised was left to the judicious exercise of Congress; all that was required was, that the rule should be uniform throughout the states. In the grant there is no other specification, as to the exercise of it, than that of its uniformity. The term naturalization was borrowed from England. It must be understood here in the sense and meaning which was, there attached to it. Whether it was absolute or qualified, it was still a naturalization. But the grant of a power in general terms necessarily implied the right to exercise that power in all its gradations. It Was in the political as it was in the natural world: the genus included the species. Besides, the power to naturalize was an attribute to sovereignty. It was either absolute or qualified; and if the grant to Congress only implied a power of unlimited naturalization, the power to qualify existed in the states or in the people, for what was not specifically granted was reserved.

In treating of the executive power, the Constitution defines the qualifications of the President. It declares that he should be a natural-born citizen, or a citizen at the adoption of the Constitution. This article is unquestionably no limitation of the power of Congress upon the subject of naturalization. It was impossible to abridge a specific grant of power without a specific limitation, and the article alluded to could not be tortured, by the most ingenious mind, to diminish, even by implication, the authority of Congress upon a subject to which it was totally irrelevant.

Thomas Jefferson – Natural Born Citizen

In Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, Volume 21, Pages 250-251 ( http://tinyurl.com/8zvmgy ), we see notes from Thomas Jefferson from December 1783.

The first question is

“Qu. 1. Can an American citizen, adult, now inherit lands in England?”

to which Thomas Jefferson begins his answer with

“Natural subjects can inherit–Aliens cannot.
There is no middle character–every man must be the one or the other of these.”

(In other words, dual nationality did not exist. Citizenship was singular.)

Thomas Jefferson also wrote this in his answer:

“An alien is the subject or citizen of a foreign power.
The treaty of peace acknowleges we are no longer to owe allegiance to the king of G.B. It acknowleges us no longer as Natural subjects then.
It makes us citizens of independent states; it makes us aliens then.”

(So, in the context of these notes, an “alien” is an American citizen and not a British subject.)

The second question is

“Qu.2. The father a British subject; the son in America, adult, and within the description of an American citizen, according to their laws. Can the son inherit?”

and Thomas Jefferson answers, before dealing with an objection, 
“He owes allegiance to the states. He is an alien then and cannot inherit.”

(For the adult “alien” citizen son, the state of the British father does not descend to him, neither with respect to nationality/allegiance nor with respect to property.)

The third question is
“Qu. 3. The father a British subject. The son as in Qu. 2. but an infant. Can he inherit?”

Thomas Jefferson’s answer:

“1st. by the Common law.
We have seen before that the state of the father does not draw to it as an accessory that of the son where he is an adult.  But by the common law.”

(Thomas Jefferson wrote that there was “no middle character” between a “natural subject” and an “alien”. Further, he called the ADULT AMERICAN CITIZEN son of the British subject an ALIEN who could not inherit from the British father. So, it stands to reason that Thomas Jefferson is calling the MINOR son of the British subject a NATURAL SUBJECT by the common law in following the state of the father, even though the minor son is in America following the Treaty of Paris, called the “treaty of peace” in Thomas Jefferson’s answer to Question 1.)

“An alien is the subject or citizen of a foreign power.
The treaty of peace acknowleges we are no longer to owe allegiance to the king of G.B. It acknowleges us no longer as Natural subjects then.
It makes us citizens of independent states; it makes us aliens then.”

Here is the bomb- 
When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Therefore Obama is an alien of the United States and an Alien is not, can not, nor EVER be a “Natural Born Citizen”

Obama’s Birth Certificate Forgery Proven

I have been looking into the Obama Birth Certificate.  Here’s what can be said.

Currently there are two different Birth Certificates. One off Obama’s web-site and the other on FactCheck. Here is the one on His web-site.

Notice that it does not have three items, Date stamp, signiture, or seal. The seal is embossed. Hence would clearly be visible.

It COULD NOT HAVE BEEN RELEASED BY THE STATE OF HAWAII.

Even if it was sent in a flat box, it is still missing the requied items, from the State. Nor would the Sate release the document electronically as some Obama supporters have suggested.

If the BC on his website was released by any official State Dept, it would have been notorized with the embossed SEAL, signed, and dated before it was released to ANYBODY. Including Obama himself.
If it was printed out by the Dept of Health via computer, it would have to have checked, verified, and Sealed, dated, and signed, before it was released to ANYBODY. Precaution to ANY official document.

The dept official stated that it should have the seal and date. Janice Okubo.

No let’s go to the FactCheck Birth Certificate.

Although this looks like a “Certified” Birth Certificate it is a forgery.  It does appers to have the date stamp, and signiture, however the SEAL is the give away to forgery.

Here is an actual Hawaii Birth Certificate;

Notice the embossed SEAL. Now we will look at the seal. We cropped the seal, flipped it, increased the contrast and look what we have. Below is the cropped/enlarged SEAL off a known good Hawaii Birth Certifcate.

Clearly able to read the following: “Department of Health” and “State of Hawaii”

[The above SEAL is NOT on Obama’s]

Now lets do the same with the embossed Sael off the FactCheck Birth certificatem, and see what we get.

again, another shot

Whats that, NO lettering stating where it was “Certified” from:

There IS NO lettering in the embossed SEAL.  There is NO “Department of Health” and “State of Hawaii” Some have e-mailed me claiming they can see the lettering… Sorry folks, the State of Hawaii confirmed that it is NOT their seal used. You can clearly see the difference between the two, and one is a fake seal. The fake seal is on Obama’s.

Below is a side by side comparison between the two seals. For all the Obama supporters out there who claim they see things on the seal that is not there. The one on the left is from an actual Hawaiian Birth Certificate and the one on the right is from the Obama Birth Certificate from FactCheck. OK, here it is again, the one on the left is REAL, the one on the right is Obama’s. Sorry if you tell the difference between right and left.

 

Here is an e-mail that I recieved from the State of Hawaii.

 

Do you understand what it says.  The official State seal used by the Department of Health, has lettering embedded into the seal.

Obama’s does not have any lettering and is not an official seal from the State of Hawaii.

It’s a forgery.  Obama can’t porduce a valid Birth Certificate, nor can he prove Natural Born Citizenship.

Obama was adopted by Lolo Soetor when he moved to Indonesia and the following is his “Official” registration at school in Indonesia.

Notice the name: Barry Soetoro Nationality: Indonesian Religion: Muslim

There it is folks. Obama busted!

I have been swamped with people saying that comparing Birth Certificates from two different states is not a valid comparison.  Here is an official US Guide for Birth certificates. There are standards for Birth Certificates, and the information contained therein.  The short form is limited in data, hence the long form or “Vault” copy prefered.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/techap99.pdf

 
 
 

 

 

Standard certificate of live birth
 

 

The U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth, issued by the Public Health Service, has served for many years as the principal means of attaining uniformity in the content of the documents used to collect information on births in the United States. It has been modified in each State to the extent required by the particular State’s needs or by special provisions of the State’s vital statistics law. However, most State certificates conform closely in content to the standard certificate.
The first standard certificate of birth was developed in 1900. Since then, it has been revised periodically by the national vital statistics agency through consultation with State health officers and registrars; Federal agencies concerned with vital statistics; national, State, and county medical societies; and others working in public health, social welfare, demography, and insurance. This procedure has assured careful evaluation of each item for its current and future usefulness for legal, medical, demographic, and research purposes. New items have been added when necessary, and old items have been modified to ensure better reporting or, in some cases, dropped when their usefulness appeared to be limited.

 

1989 revision
 
–Effective January 1, 1989, a revised U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth (figure 4-A) replaced the 1978 revision. This revision provided a wide variety of new information on maternal and infant health characteristics, representing a significant departure from previous versions in both content and format. The most significant format change was the use of check boxes to obtain detailed medical and health information about the mother and child. It has been demonstrated that this format produces higher quality and more complete information than do open-ended items.