March 31, 2012 – Sheriff Arpaio: Obama’s Records Are Forgeries

The Obama records which have not been released include; Passport records, Obama kindergarten records, Punahou School records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, University of Chicago scholarly articles, Illinois State Bar Association records, Illinois State Senate records/schedules (said to be lost), Medical records, Obama/Dunham marriage license, Obama/Dunham divorce documents, Soetoro/Dunham marriage license, Adoption records and of course the long-form Certificate of Live Birth.
State Representative Carl Seel, who introduced the bill, was joined by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, State Senator Lori Klein, and others in support of the bill. Important new information was revealed during the news conference including a request by Sheriff Joe Arpaio to the current head of the Selective Service Board to investigate the criminal forgery committed in the case of Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration. In addtion, Carl Seel reveals some of the resistance that other Republicans are creating to stop the bill from even heading to a vote.
The bill will require Barack Obama, or any candidate seeking to be on the Arizona ballot, to certify eligibility for the office they are seeking. This will essentially require Barack Obama to certify his eligibility if he wants to be on the ballot this year in Arizona. This could potentially be a game-changing piece of legislation.


Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Obama’s Birth Certificate

Watch Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo presentation of Obama’s Fake Forged Phoney Birth Certificate.



Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate – NOT! Part 3

As I reported when the Obama long form ‘Birth Certificate?’ was released link, the Obama long form has no embossed seal, either from 1961 [as in the Nordyke Birth Certificates] or from 2011 when the latest forgery was issued by the State of Hawaii

Now being reported by WorldNet Daily;

A previously unexplained anomaly in the

Birth certificate doesn’t meet Hawaii standards

Image White House released ‘may not be a certified copy’

 Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House has now become even more suspicious, as WND has learned the document does not conform to Hawaii’s standard practice for issuing certified copies of birth certificates.

While the governor’s office maintains Obama was given a certified copy of his birth certificate, and while Hawaii – WND has learned – includes an embossed seal to complete the certification, the raised seal on the image posted by the White House … is missing.

Furthermore, an official with the Vital Statistics Section of Hawaii’s Department of Health told WND, a document without the seal “may not be a certified copy.”

And even if the seal is placed on the backside of a document, the embossing process creates an impression that can be seen on the front. In the following long-form birth certificate copy issued by the Hawaii DOH on March 12, 2011, markings from a raised seal are visible with magnification. No similar embossed seal markings are discernable on the White House-released birth certificate, even under magnification.
Read more: WND

Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate – NOT! Part 2

There is numerous other bloggers that are posting about the Obama long form Birth Certificate is a forgery, based upon the layering and the linked additions being rotated 90 degress. However there is even a reason to doubt the authenticity of the document that has been posted.

Here is the Obama long form that the White House states was issued by the Department of Health from the State of Hawaii.’

To date there is no other Birth Certificate issued by the State of Hawaii, that shows the left side bent, as it is in the Obama version. The image above clearly was copied onto the security paper using a copier. However that is not the point of this post.

The information in the long form Birth Certificate should ‘VALIDATE’ the information that was presented on the COLB [Certification of Live Birth] aka the short form version. However there is one glaring discrepency and this can’t be attributed to an error with the index file or database.

Below is a comparison between some various Birth Certificates and Obama’s COLB. Note that on the Obama COLB the field states ‘Date Files’ and the long form states ‘Date Accepted’. As the information is supposed to be taken from the long form and entered into the database, whereas the computer generated COLB data is pulled from that database, any discrepancies is not only questionable to the single document, but the entire database is then called into question.

Below is a comparison of the fields on the documents.

Here a copy of the Nordyke Twins long form Birth Certificates

Both the Nordyke’s Birth Certificates, there is no field labeled ‘Date Filed’, nor is there a “Date Accepted’ on the Obama COLB.

The Obama COLB is ‘FILED’, whereas the long form is ‘Date Accepted’, how can there be conflicting information, when the long form was supposed to be entered into the database as  valid and authentic information.

This means that either the COLB is correct and the long form a forgery, or the long form is correct and the COLB is a forgery, either way Barack Obama has issued a fraudulant document and there are laws regarding document forgery. There is no need to attempt to go over the layers, the 90 degree links and the differences between the AP and the White House versions. The fact that there are discrepancies between the two documents is proof enough that there exists a major problem that indicates document forgery.

 If this is in reality Obama’s 1961 long form Birth Certificate why is the data not in the database, where a computer generated document would be printed out, or the original 1961 long form Birth Certificate would have been certified from the microfiche file [like the Nordyke’s], and this long form does not have the Director of Health’s and Generla Registrar’s signiture nor the embossed seal of the Department of Health.

The False Identification Crime Control Act of 1982, Public Law 97-398, amended Title 18 of the United States Code to provide penalties for certain false identification related crimes.
Birth Certificate Fraud 18 OEI- 07-99-00570 Section 1028 of that law addresses fraud activity in connection with identification documents. This law makes it a crime to knowingly produce, transfer, or possess false identification documents with the intent to defraud the United States. Punishment for an offense under this Act is a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment for up to 5 years. Many State statutes also address identity fraud, but it is considered a felony in only 23 States. In 28 States, birth certificate fraud remains a misdemeanor.

18 USC Sec. 1001 01/05/2009



Sec. 1001. Statements or entries generally


(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or
judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully – (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years
or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or
both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements,
representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to –
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services,
personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to
the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or                                                                                           (2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.


Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate – NOT!


Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Lt. Mike Zullo spoke with 1776 Channel in an exclusive interview today about the White House PDF scan and Savannah Guthrie’s claims.

Reed Hayes has a distinguished background as a document examiner. He has done work in document examination for Perkins Coie. Mr. Reed has concluded that the image presented by the White House is “entirely fabricated”.

We have no evidence of a raised seal being displayed on that document that Savannah Guthrie supposedly felt. We don’t know what she felt. No evidence that we can determine shows alterations to that paper body indicating a raised seal. Their work flow is a scan of the document. Upon examination there is no evidence of raised seal. We have seen examples of other Hawaii documents with raised seals clearly displayed. According to former White House attorney Bob Bauer, Obama never even handled it, but Savannah Guthrie did. – Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Lt. Mike Zullo



So here we are in 2011 and Obama has released his long form Birth Certificate, NOT!

Here is an actual 1961 Hawaiian Birth Certificate

Here’s what Obama released

 Why if the Obama long form was isued in the same month as the Nordyke Twins [image above Obama] is there a different ‘registrar’ ?

Why is there no SEAL on the document as in the Nordyke’s? There is no embossed seal, either from 1961 [as in the Nordyke Birth Certificates] or from 2011. WHY?

What happened to Dr. Rodney West, who was supposed to be the doctor that delivered Obama?

Per the State of Hawaii concerning the SEAL;

The Hawaii Administrative Rules, Title 11, Department of Health, Section 11-1-2, regarding the Seal of the Department of Health, state:


§11-1-2 Seal of the department of health.

a) The official seal of the department of health shall be circular in shape, two and one-fourth inches in diameter. At the curve on the top portion there shall be the words “DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH” and at the curve on the bottom portion there shall be the words “STATE OF HAWAII.” At the curve on each side portion shall be a star. In the center of the seal shall be the Caduceus, a winged rod entwined with two serpents, which has long been recognized as a universal symbol of medicine. The Caduceus shall be encircled by an indentation, which shall separate it from the words “DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH” and “STATE OF HAWAII.” For illustrative purposes, a black and white drawing of the official seal is attached at the end of this section as Exhibit “A,” titled “Seal of the Department of Health,” and dated November 1, 1988, and made a part of this section.

(b) The official seal of the department of health shall be embossed near the signature of the director of health to verify commissions of appointment of deputy directors and notaries public, certificates, and other formal official documents on which the official seal has been customarily used or is appropriate to be used, as the director of health may determine on a case-by-case basis.

(c) The seal of the department of health may also be reproduced, in either an enlarged or a reduced size, on official stationery, reports, certificates, equipment, supplies, uniform insignia, and other objects and items to be used or produced by the department of health, but the reproduction and use of the seal shall always be subject to the exclusive control of the director of health.

[Eff 2/14/2005 ] (Auth: HRS §§321-9, 91-2) (Imp:  HRS §§321-9, 91-2)

According to the web site the name didn’t change to Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital merged with Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1978. So how could his official long form birth certificate that was generated in 1961 have the name of the hospital that wasn’t created until 1978?”

Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital opened in 1909 named for Emma Kauikeolani Napoleon Mahelona (1862–1931), the wife of Albert Spencer Wilcox (1844–1919). In 1978, it merged with Kapiʻolani Maternity Home to become Kapiʻolani Medical Center for Women and Children.

So the hospital that is on the document Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital, changed/merged with Kapiʻolani Medical Center in 1978 and Hawaii updates all existing records to reflect the name change on file. Does the State of Hawaii issue new and updated Birth Certificates to all persons born there in the past?

I am not stating that the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital did not exist, nor that the Nordyke’s Birth Certificates are not vaild as they also state Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital. What needs to be pointed out is that Nordyke’s 1961 long form Birth Certificate is different then the long form presented by Obama.

Why are there seams on the background and the appearance that the document was scanned? Recall that Hawaiin officials have stated that the current COLB’s are computer generated and printed out.

If this was a certified copy of the 1961 original, then why doesn’t it look like a 1961 long form?

This is nothing more then another attempt to pass off a forgery with additional information to make it appear that it is authentic. The COLB that was pawned off before this one, has the registration as ‘FILED’ this one says ‘ACCEPTED’, there can be no difference. As the COLB is supposed to be ‘EXACTLY’ the same data as the original it’s supposed to represent.

Where is the Director of Health’s name and signiture?

Where is the Registrar General’s name and signiture?

The date on this that Stanley Ann signed was on the 7th, while the birth was supposed to take place on the 4th. Mothers normally sign the birth registration within minutes of given birth. Any mother will attest that right after the baby is born, the paperwork begins.

So if Obama was born in Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital on Aug 4th, 1961 why is there not the same long form Birth Certificate on file as the Nordyke twins, born just after Obama was supposed to.

Why is Obama’s long form contain data that is on the index and is not contain the signitures and SEAL that a correct and valid Birth Certificate that would have been forwarded to the Department of Health in Hawaii in 1961 have?

Was Stanley Ann even pregnant!

Is it 1959 or 1962?


Does the Long Form consist of layers?

How does a computer printout, based on a database contain imaging layers?

Here is a second video exposing the forgery. Seems like this fraudulant document is being caught on the first day of posting by numerous people.