Open Letter to Bill O’Reilly

To the clown pince of spin, once again I have edited a letter and sent it to the bloviating ‘Prince of Spin’ Bill O’Reilly.

Hencewith here is the letter.

Billy

First off, I am a reformed viewer.  Reformed as in I can no longer view your spin-zone without seeing through your bias and blatant lying to the American public. Over the past few years your attempts to malign and marginalize those that questioned Obama’s past is at best yellow journalism.

Recently, your shallow defense of Obama when questioned about his being a Muslim was totally ignorant. Your response; ‘pass any info along to you’. I already know that numerous emails, both electronic and postal have been trashed, neglected, and outright dismissed by you and your staff.

When, Barack Obama stands in front of the UN and publicly states that “the future does not belong to those that insult Islam” or numerous other statements that not only defend Islam but insult every other religion, you still play ignorance. The latest insult from Obama at the Prayer Breakfast where ‘Christians have done terrible things.’ How does one equate 1400 years of jihad and war to a 20 year crusade that liberated those under the savagery and butchery of Islam. When murders at a Paris Deli equate to random acts, when terrorist attacks in Copenhagen can’t be spoken for what they are. Wait till they happen here, then what will you call it? A parrot by any other name is still a parrot. Will you repeat the talking points with such conviction then? Barack Obama views his entire world and existence from an Islam upbringing and schooling. To that point Barack Obama cannot even call the obvious ‘Islamic Terrorism’ for what it is. Islam by its nature and definition is to kill anyone and everyone that is not Islamic or submissive to Islamic rule and domination. Read the Koran and Hadith. In Obama’s mind, Muslim’s wage JIHAD wherever they are, however they can and Major Nidal Malik Hasan was just waging jihad at work. But the Ft Hood massacre is now rightfully renamed and those that were murdered and wounded can receive their benefits that were denied under political correctness. Now Obama has an Islamic terrorist attack under his watch and he can’t even classify it correctly. Get educated Billy.

After your earlier lie, where you stated that kids get social security numbers based upon where their parents live. A lie beyond even mind numbing. You must be wholly ignorant of the facts. When the SSN was supposedly issued in 1977, they were issued on where you started to work. Even with that, when did Barack Obama Sr. ever live in Connecticut?  Do you realize what a fool you made of yourself, even to the simple fact that Barack Obama (not Sr.) fails e-Verify. Why does he fail e-verify?  Why?

You have sold out as Judas for your 30 pieces of silver, but in your case it’s your lavish and what you think you deserve life style. Well, the real Billy, was exposed during the famous Sting rant, or was it the multi-million dollar settlement for sexual harassment.

As a final note, the reason I called you Billy, is Bill or William are for adults whom deserve respect.

You have demonstrated and shown a complete lack of even common sense and a total disregard for the truth and as Judas a sell out to your country and without any ethical or moral standard.

 

A former listener;

 

Contact Bill O’Reilly

You can email Bill at oreilly@foxnews.com. If you need help with The Store or BillOReilly.com, contact BillOReilly.com Customer Service.

 

This blog first again. Bill O’Reilly the new Ted Baxter

 

Listen to the first few moments and hear Rush call Bill O’Reilly Ted Baxter, I referred to Bill O’Really as Ted Baxter years ago. The clown king of spin.

 

Bill is the clown king of spin, forget the truth and Bill is such a schmuck that he sold his soul to get the FoxNews interview with Barak Obama, instead of asking any tough questions, the schmuck softballed his way to make himself look good.

Come on Ted, why not a real debate with someone who isn’t afraid of you and your ilk. Dare to answer a few questions that will make you look like the stupid troll that you are.  Instead to ‘Talking Point’ your segment should be ‘Dare to be as ignorant as me.’

Answer this one question O’Pinhead. ‘How does Barak Obama fulfill SR511?’

PS, Ted

I am the one that captured your lies before.

Your welcome, douchebag. The world can see the video on how much you lie your ass off.

Maybe the world that hasn’t seen the Bill that goes nuts, the real Bill O’Reilly

On a brighter note, Bill won’t be breathing any air in heaven.  Matthew 24:37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.

and since Bill supports gay/homosexual/lesbian marriage, such as it was in Sodom and Gomorrah, God dealt with them and will deal with the immorals like Bill O’Reilly again and in the same way.

Letter to Sean Hannity – The great great great unAmerican and Traitor

 For the third night in a row, Sean Hannity, you the the great great great American traitor has broached on the Obama ‘birth certificate issue’.

 As a true un-American media mouth-piece that  knows little if anything about the United States Constitution, whereas Hannity repeatedly stated  that the United States Constitution requires you to be born in the United States to be eligible for the Presidency.

 In reality the United States Constitution Under Art 2 sec 1 – The President

 No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

 Where in the above Constitutional requirement, says that one has to be born in the country? It doesn’t. The requirement is a ‘Natural-Born Citizen’.

 Let’s educate Sean Hannity

natural-born-citizen-defined

 Benjamin Franklin’s (a signer of our Constitution) letter to Charles W.F. Dumas, December 1775
“I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the Law of Nations. Accordingly, that copy which I kept (after depositing one in our own public library here, and send the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed) has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author”?

 The Law of Nations – Vattel in Bk 1 Sec 212, states the following. 

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

 The following statement was made by the author of the 14^th Amendment.

I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen -Rep. John Bingham, framer of the 14th Amendment, before The US House of Representatives ((Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291, March 9, 1866 )

Or this statement by Supreme Court Chief Justice Waite

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.
-Chief Justice Waite in Minor v. Happersett (1875)

The 14^th Amendment states the following;

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Born in the United States but ‘JURISDICTION” is required.

Under Jus Soli, the following is written “The Supreme Court’s first holding on the sublect suggested that the court would give a restrictive reading to the phrase, potentially disqualifing significant number of persons born within the physical boundries of the nation. In Elk v. Wilkins 112 U.S. 94, 5 S.CT. 41, 28 L.ED. 643 (1884), the court ruled that native Indians were not U.S. citizens, even if they later severed their ties with their tribes. The words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” the court held, mean “not merely subjct in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiange.” Most Indians could not meet the test. “Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian Tribes, (an alien through dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’*** then the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government ***. Id. at 102.

Baracka Abdallah Husein Obama stated the following on his campaign web-site;

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children

However, Barack Obama has not proven his claim of being born in the United States. The Obama COLB is not a Birth Certificate. It is, instead, cursory information that a birth occurred. It is superficial, it is not thorough or detailed as the long form that it supports to represent. The fact that the Obama COLB has been proven to be questionable at best and a forgery at the least, and as there are no records per the current Hawaiian Governor backing it up. If there are no records backing up the document, how was the document produced in the first place?

Sean, stop lying to the American people. According to new poll & survey — 91% of Americans doubt Obama is constitutionally eligible! You are only fooling yourself and betraying your country. Learn the facts.

Your failure is the reason that an 18 year Army career LtCol. Sits in Leavenwoth Prision for standing up and demanding Obama prove his eligibility. Learn about Terry Lakin, and you’ll see why you don’t deserve to be in the same room as him. Or Charles Kerchner, Mario Appuzo,  Theresa Cao, Walter Fitzpatrick, and a host of other REAL GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOTS. Shame on you Sean, you should hang your head in disgrace.

A real American that has served this country.