This blog first again. Bill O’Reilly the new Ted Baxter


Listen to the first few moments and hear Rush call Bill O’Reilly Ted Baxter, I referred to Bill O’Really as Ted Baxter years ago. The clown king of spin.




Bill is the clown king of spin, forget the truth and Bill is such a schmuck that he sold his soul to get the FoxNews interview with Barak Obama, instead of asking any tough questions, the schmuck softballed his way to make himself look good.


Come on Ted, why not a real debate with someone who isn’t afraid of you and your ilk. Dare to answer a few questions that will make you look like the stupid troll that you are.  Instead to ‘Talking Point’ your segment should be ‘Dare to be as ignorant as me.’

Answer this one question O’Pinhead. ‘How does Barak Obama fulfill SR511?’

PS, Ted

I am the one that captured your lies before.

Your welcome, douchebag. The world can see the video on how much you lie your ass off.

Maybe the world that hasn’t seen the Bill that goes nuts, the real Bill O’Reilly

On a brighter note, Bill won’t be breathing any air in heaven.  Matthew 24:37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.

and since Bill supports gay/homosexual/lesbian marriage, such as it was in Sodom and Gomorrah, God dealt with them and will deal with the immorals like Bill O’Reilly again and in the same way.

Obama lied, Qbama denied, Americans died

Obama lied, Qbama denied, Americans died

This whiteboard animation shows what happened when Hitler lied to get elected and people don’t care or pay attention to the lies of their leaders, until they do care…and at that point, it is too late. Parts of this video are narrated by a man who served as a German soldier and a German woman who lived right by the railroad tracks the cattle trains ran on that carried the Jews to their deaths.

Based on Andy Andrews’ book, How Do You Kill 11 Million People?
Produced by

This is real, don’t be fooled. This is happening.

H/T drkatesview

Obama lied, Obama lied to the American people

White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails

The U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames during a protest by an armed group said to have been protesting a film being produced in the United States September 11, 2012. REUTERS/Esam Al-Fetori

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON | Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:11pm EDT

(Reuters) – Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.

The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.

The brief emails also show how U.S. diplomats described the attack, even as it was still under way, to Washington.

U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Benghazi assault, which President Barack Obama and other U.S. officials ultimately acknowledged was a “terrorist” attack carried out by militants with suspected links to al Qaeda affiliates or sympathizers.

Administration spokesmen, including White House spokesman Jay Carney, citing an unclassified assessment prepared by the CIA, maintained for days that the attacks likely were a spontaneous protest against an anti-Muslim film.

While officials did mention the possible involvement of “extremists,” they did not lay blame on any specific militant groups or possible links to al Qaeda or its affiliates until intelligence officials publicly alleged that on September 28.

There were indications that extremists with possible al Qaeda connections were involved, but also evidence that the attacks could have erupted spontaneously, they said, adding that government experts wanted to be cautious about pointing fingers prematurely.

U.S. intelligence officials have emphasized since shortly after the attack that early intelligence reporting about the attack was mixed.

Spokesmen for the White House and State Department had no immediate response to requests for comments on the emails.


The records obtained by Reuters consist of three emails dispatched by the State Department’s Operations Center to multiple government offices, including addresses at the White House, Pentagon, intelligence community and FBI, on the afternoon of September 11.

The first email, timed at 4:05 p.m. Washington time – or 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 20-30 minutes after the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission allegedly began – carried the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack” and the notation “SBU”, meaning “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The text said the State Department’s regional security office had reported that the diplomatic mission in Benghazi was “under attack. Embassy in Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well.”

The message continued: “Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four … personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.”

A second email, headed “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi” and timed 4:54 p.m. Washington time, said that the Embassy in Tripoli had reported that “the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi had stopped and the compound had been cleared.” It said a “response team” was at the site attempting to locate missing personnel.

A third email, also marked SBU and sent at 6:07 p.m. Washington time, carried the subject line: “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack.”

The message reported: “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli.”

While some information identifying recipients of this message was redacted from copies of the messages obtained by Reuters, a government source said that one of the addresses to which the message was sent was the White House Situation Room, the president’s secure command post.

Other addressees included intelligence and military units as well as one used by the FBI command center, the source said.

It was not known what other messages were received by agencies in Washington from Libya that day about who might have been behind the attacks.

Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.

By the morning of September 12, the day after the Benghazi attack, Reuters reported that there were indications that members of both Ansar al-Sharia, a militia based in the Benghazi area, and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, the North African affiliate of al Qaeda’s faltering central command, may have been involved in organizing the attacks.

One U.S. intelligence official said that during the first classified briefing about Benghazi given to members of Congress, officials “carefully laid out the full range of sparsely available information, relying on the best analysis available at the time.”

The official added, however, that the initial analysis of the attack that was presented to legislators was mixed.

“Briefers said extremists were involved in attacks that appeared spontaneous, there may have been a variety of motivating factors, and possible links to groups such as (al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and Ansar al-Sharia) were being looked at closely,” the official said.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Mary Milliken and Jim Loney)



Here are the emails.



Hey Stephanie

In the latest Stephanie Cutter mass e-mail solicitation for money, the little Demo-rat is completely in a state of dementia.

Quote by her words ‘As President Obama said, Mitt Romney would take us back to the foreign policy of the 1980s, social policy of the 1950s, and economic policy of the 1920s. President Obama’s vision, on the other hand, would build on the progress of the last four years, do some nation building here at home, and move America forward, not back.’

OK, lets look at the facts;

foreign policy of the 1980s – Reagan was in office, our military was strong, we defeated the Soviet Union. After the idiot from Plains (Jimma Carter) was removed from office, the US economy roared back to life. The moonbats and enemedia must have a hard time not having the double digit inflation and mortgages of the Carter years. Let alone the high unemployment rate that Carter created. 

social policy of the 1950s – what’s was wrong with the good ole American family, high morals, good character, and civil responsibility. Unlike the teenage trollop named Stanley Ann Dunham, who’s moral character is lower then a limbo bar at a nudist camp. Remember ‘I like Ike’. The 50’s were also the fastest growth in the United States. Detroit was booming, the manufacturing industry was the envy of the world. Made in America was the highest standard. 

economic policy of the 1920s – again, the moonbats and enemedia forget what the term used to describe the 1920’s, oh yea the ‘ROARING 20’s’, The Roaring Twenties is a term sometimes used to refer to the 1920s, characterizing the era’s distinctive cultural edge in most of the world’s major cities for a period of sustained economic prosperity.

Let’s repeat that several times;

period of sustained economic prosperity.

period of sustained economic prosperity.

period of sustained economic prosperity.

period of sustained economic prosperity.

Unlike the last four years under the ‘Affirmative Action’ pRresident Barak Obama,

Here are some interesting facts;



2002 Average – $1.44
2012  Average- $3.73
Percent Increase: 158%


2002 Average – $.99
2012 Average-$1.24
Percent Increase: 25%


2002 Average – $1.03
2012 Average-$1.80
Percent Increase: 73%


2002 Average – $2.92
2012 Average-$5.58
Percent Increase: 90%


2002 Average – $1.96
2012 Average-$2.75
Percent Increase: 40%


2002 Average – $2.75
2012 Average-$3.47
Percent Increase: 26%


2002 Average – $1.01
2012 Average-$1.41
Percent Increase: 39%


2002 Average – $0.91
2012 Average-$1.32
Percent Increase: 44%


2002 Average – $1.84
2012 Average-$2.69
Percent Increase: 46%


2002 Average – $0.94
2012 Average-$1.35
Percent Increase: 43%


2002 Average – $6.23
2012 Average-$10.03
Percent Increase: 60%


2002 Average – $.091
2012 Average-$.130
Percent Increase: 42%


2002 Average – $4.40
2012 Average-$6.22
Percent Increase:  41%


2002 Average – $o.86
2012 Average-$2.09
Percent Increase: 143%


2002 Average – $1.18
2012 Average-$1.44
Percent Increase: 22%


2002 Average – $1.05
2012 Average-$1.65
Percent Increase: 56%


2002 Average – $3.23
2012 Average-$4.52
Percent Increase: 39%


2002 Average – $2.28
2012 Average-$3.69
Percent Increase: 61%


2002 Average – $2.59
2012 Average-$3.61
Percent Increase: 39%

So you can see why Stephanie Cutter is completely off her rocker and spreads nothing but Barak bullshi& to the uneducated moonbats.  Keeping it sleazy and pathetic Stephanie. What’s worse is that Barak has no intention of stopping these lies and that his campaign will continue to slander whomever and whatever it thinks will garner votes.

Obama predicted years ago

Watch and see the things they talked about then and hear what Obama is spreading now.
Watch out for the “ism”, that pretends that you’ll have everything, Universal medicine is socialized medicine. Universal anything is another way for the Government to take control. When they take control, how do you gain control back. You don’t. There goes your freedom.