Trump campaign notified of unethical conduct

The Trump campaign has been notified and passed all relevant material posted here, concerning the unethical conduct at Tea Party Nation.

TPNBanner3

Specifically the targeting, banning, and deleting of individuals by moderators that do not support Ted Cruz.

Yes, this is a fact.

Allow me to explain.

As some of my followers know, Sandpoint Idaho is a small community. My father-in-law grew up there, owned a business there and raised a family there. His roots there are deep along with his family.

Here is a picture of my brother in law, my father in law and a high school friend, named Chuck.

CTC

The above picture is my father in law and Chuck Heath during the Spokane Bloomsday festival in the 1980’s. Whenever Chuck gets to Sandpoint old friends always get together.

My father in law went went to school and college with Chuck. They have been friends for over 60 years. Chuck married Sally. Here is a picture of Chuck and Sally. (yes, gotten off the internet)

chuck-sally

Chuck is a great Packer fan. By the way, my father in law also played high school football with Jerry Kramer #64 of the Packers.  Wahoo!

Anyways, Chuck and Sally had a daughter named Sarah, born in Bonner General. After a few years, the Heath’s moved to Alaska, in a sleepy little town called Wasilla. Where Sarah grew up and married a young man named Todd Palin. Yes, a close friend of the family is Sarah Palin, the same Sarah Palin, who endorses Donald Trump.

My mother in law is also good friends of Chuck and Sally Heath, and so is another family friend Diana, who was also married to wonderful man, whom my father in law played high school football with. Not to mention my wife’s uncle, Terry’s brother Kenny and his wife. It’s a small world after all. Isn’t it!

I wonder what is going to happen when the Trump campaign reviews all the material posted here and then some not posted, about what is happening to their supporters.

BTW; since speaking with the IRS on several of the complaints. It is not neccessary to be directly involved, and as such multiple more complaints will be filed over the other people banned and deleted over at TPN and other sites. Below is one site that likes my material and research.

1

Some one thought they were being clever and decided that personal objectives overruled ethical conduct and IRS regulations. They however didn’t realize they screwed the pooch and then lied to cover it up. They also thought they would get away with it or that people would just sit by idly by and not do anything about it. They were wrong. Oh, how they are wrong.

Advertisements

Cruz is a funny guy, should be doing standup comedy

Cartoon

Remember when people started questioning Barack Obama’s Constitutional eligibility? Representitives and Senators started form mailing their constituents, deflecting Barack Obama’s failure to meet the United States Constitutional requirements, by claiming that since Barack Obama was born (claimed, never proven) in Hawaii, that means he’s a Natural-Born Citizen.

Read these excuses by the elected Rep’s. Every single one evades the Constitutional requirements by claiming since Obama was born in Hawaii, he’s eligible.

Highlighted for the reader.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio: “President Obama has provided several news organizations with a copy of his birth certificate, showing he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961. Hawaii became a state in 1959, and all individuals born in Hawaii after its admission are considered natural-born United States citizens. In addition, the Hawaii State Health Department recently issued a public statement verifying the authenticity of President Obama’s birth certificate.”
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y.: “The courts have held that President Obama is a natural-born American citizen. Moreover, in December 2008, the Supreme Court declined to hear a lawsuit challenging Mr. Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, concurring with three other federal courts in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Washington. The courts have confirmed the determination of state officials in Hawaii that health department records prove that Barack Obama was born a U.S. citizen in Honolulu.”

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga.: “President Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.”

Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa.: “I am confident that Mr. Obama meets all the constitutional requirements to be our 44th president. Mr. Obama has posted a copy of his birth certificate on his campaign website and submitted an additional copy to the independent website FactCheck.org. The birth certificate demonstrates that he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii in 1961, thereby making him a natural-born citizen eligible to be president.

U.S. Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif.: “As you know, some questions were raised about whether President Obama is a natural born citizen. There was a recent lawsuit arguing that he is not eligible for the Presidency for this reason. I understand that the Supreme Court considered hearing this lawsuit, but it ultimately turned down the request to have the case considered before the full court. I further understand that the director of Hawaii’s Department of Health recently confirmed that President Obama was born in Honolulu

U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes, D-N.H.: “President Obama publicly posted his birth certificate on his campaign website which confirms that he was born in Hawaii in 1961. This birth certificate confirms that President Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States
Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, “The Constitution and federal law require that, among other things, only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) may be President of the United States. In President Obama’s case, some individuals have filed lawsuits in state and federal courts alleging that he has not proven that he is an American citizen, but each of those lawsuits have been dismissed. This includes a recent decision by the United States Supreme Court to not review an “application for emergency stay” filed by a New Jersey resident claiming that the President is not a natural born citizen because his father was born in Kenya. Furthermore, both the Director of Hawaii’s Department of Health and the state’s Registrar of Vital Statistics recently confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency. If contrary documentation is produced and verified, this matter will necessarily be resolved by the judicial branch of our government under the Constitution.”

Sen. Mark. R. Warner, D-Va., “The facts have consistently shown that President Obama was born in the United States. As a natural-born American citizen, he is fully eligible to serve as president of our country.”

So if they based Obama’s eligibility soley based on being born ‘in’ the country, by their standards Rafael ‘Ted’ Cruz is not eligible.

Rafael (Ted Cruz) BC

Rafael (Ted Cruz) BC

MWH6wAm

10qtzp

Meet Scot Sheely – TPN Moderator and political censorship

It appears that Scot Sheely has been known in the Tea Party circle for some time for his vulgar comments and deleting accounts of others whom he happens to disagree with. As a rabid Ted Cruz supporter, Scot Sheely will undoubtedly discredit and falsify documentation in justifying his banning and deleting others on political sites. The screenshot below is ample proof that Scot Sheely’s actions are only unethical by cross in political censorship.

Here is a member in the Tea Party Command Center describing Scot Sheely to a tee.

HankJordanScotSheelyDeletingTPNHL

Note: .you are deleting accounts at the Tea Party Nation, of members who stand against Ted Cruz, I seen this for myself.

So who is this moderator known for deleting accounts at the Tea Party Nation, of members who stand against Ted Cruz?

A retired Air Force musician. All the screenshots below are all from websites after a google search.

ScotSheelyBG3

ScotSheelyBG5

ScotSheelyBG2

ScotSheelyBG

I will be adding the above information to the IRS complaint #3 and as a moderator on Tea Party Nation, the owner Judson Phillips is responsible for the actions of his moderators and I an sure that Scot Sheely will try and worm his way out of any responsibility.

Since Scot Sheely like to use a image that was referring to ecomonic slavery on TPN, lets have a look at some of Scot Sheely’s caption work;

ScotSheelyCaptionThis3

ScotSheelyCaptionThis2

ScotSheelyCaptionThis

talk about racist language! What do say for yourself now Scot Sheely?

10qvb0

Tea Party Nation – the den of hypocrisy

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up

Scot Sheely says ‘Deflector shields up!’

 

Update: 

IRS Complaint #3 has been electronically filed.

ScotSheelyIRSComplaint3

Here is the section detailing the complaint

ScotSheelyIRSComplaint3A

ScotSheelyComplaint3Crop

Scot Sheely says ‘Deflector shields up!’

kirk2Med

Like Capt Kirk in a panic, Tea Party Nation moderator Scot Sheely is in full blown denial mode and attempting to mislead and cover his actions. It’s almost hysterical watching him post misleading obvious lies.

Here is his latest post. ScotSheelyAgainDeflectingCrop

 

Note that once again, Scot Sheely is commenting on an image that is 5 years old. Again, here is the email that Scot Sheely sent and the reason that ‘HE’ banned me.

http://www.teapartynation.com/main/authorization/termsOfService

You agree that you will not post, email or make available any content or use this Network:

-in a manner that is libelous or defamatory, or in a way that is otherwise threatening, abusive, violent, harassing, malicious or harmful to any person or entity, or invasive of another’s privacy; 

-Post any content that depicts or contains rape, extreme violence, murder, bestiality, incest, or other similar content; 

Post irrelevant content, repeatedly post the same or similar content or otherwise impose an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the Network’s infrastructure;

Posting images of Adolf Hitler, the Nazis, Nazi swastikas or any other similar violent, anti-Semitic imagery or lingo in the manner in which you posted such content is a legitimate cause for banning. Discussing the name Hitler is radically different from posting Nazi images, including Hitler. Including images of the WWII Nazis in the context of an original new thread discussing the holocaust or a similar event is acceptable if it is topical, timely and relevant. Attempting to tie those images into a current political candidate, regardless who it is, is unacceptable.

Don’t message us and ask why you were banned, this is the only explanation you need.

I will give you one more chance to participate after a one month cooldown ‘timeout’ period. You will not be able to log back in until 4-10-16 @ 4:00 PM EDT.

Your activities will be closely monitored once you are able to participate again a month from now.

This will be your final warning before being permanently banned.

 

Note: there is no mention of the supposed image that Scot Sheely now claims. But a clear and direct message about an NAZI image. Scot Sheely is the NAZI!

Here is another TPN member calling out Scot Sheely for is actions.

VernsPostScotBanning2BCropped

Again supporting and acknowledging that Scot Sheely has been banning only those that support Trump.

VernNobarackBannedBecauseB

again for the readers here, the following is the exact post by Scot Sheely on the ‘Dump Trump’

ScotPostBanningHL

Scot Sheely is a lying POS. You can see he’s now saying something completely different. First Nazi images and now something else. Liars can’t keep their stories straight and Scot Sheely is a liar. 

Everything that is being posted here is being sent to the Trump campaign, other media outlets, social media, the IRS. 

 

Tea Party Nation – the den of hypocrisy

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up

TPNBanner3

Tea Party Nation moderator Scot Sheely has been posting crap to justify banning folks with an opposing opinion and choice of presidential Candidates.

In the following post

ScotSheelyExcuses

Scot Sheely is making excuses, first off in the previous posts Scot Sheely is clearly referencing Nazi images, swatstikas, etc. The image that he links is one that was created over 5 years ago and here it is.

ScotSheelydoesn'tLike

The ignorant Scot Sheely can’t see past his nose that it depicts Hernman Cain, and because he was not a slave to the Democrat Party and wasn’t in bondage to the ecomonic slavery that the Democrats enslave. It was posted all across the internet and no one complained. However Scot Sheely has nothing else to complain about.

I guess you have to have some intelligence to be able to interpret things and Scot Sheely doesn’t have any.

Again, here is what Scot Sheely stated on banning.

Posting images of Adolf Hitler, the Nazis, Nazi swastikas or any other similar violent, anti-Semitic imagery or lingo in the manner in which you posted such content is a legitimate cause for banning. Discussing the name Hitler is radically different from posting Nazi images, including Hitler. Including images of the WWII Nazis in the context of an original new thread discussing the holocaust or a similar event is acceptable if it is topical, timely and relevant. Attempting to tie those images into a current political candidate, regardless who it is, is unacceptable.

Don’t message us and ask why you were banned, this is the only explanation you need.

I will give you one more chance to participate after a one month cooldown ‘timeout’ period. You will not be able to log back in until 4-10-16 @ 4:00 PM EDT.

Your activities will be closely monitored once you are able to participate again a month from now.

This will be your final warning before being permanently banned.

Below is a photo posted by Scot Sheely and notice whom he attacks, makes fun of. Cause mocking Trump is Ok, but Cruz is protected. Note that in Scot Sheely’s statement above, he doesn’t reference the image of Cruz that was his excuse for banning, but a completely different image that was posted 5 years prior.

Scot Sheely is full of shit!

It’s OK cause it is his agenda to promote Ted Cruz, and as a moderator he thinks he’s untouchable. I wonder what the IRS will be saying, and I wonder that Judson Phillips will be says after Scot Sheely is exposed.


ScotSheelyPhoto

Again, here is the image I posted of Teddy cruz that Scot Sheely’s panties in a wad.

10gy75

Scot Sheely – WORLD CLASS HYPOCRITE and Cruzbot Roach!

Here is another pserson that as been banned by Scot Sheely;

ScotCalledOut

 

Tea Party Nation – the den of hypocrisy

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

TPNBanner3

Tea Party Nation’s moderator Scot Sheely has been named in a second IRS complaint after violating the sites Terms of Service.

In the continuing saga of Scot Sheely banning the Freedom of Speech with anyone that disagrees with his political candidate (Canadian Rafael ‘Teddy’ Cruz)

Below is a post where Scot Sheely’s action have been confronted.

ScotCalledOut

Again, Scot’s own personal attacks and insults go unpunished and he continued abuse towards others that have rightfully challenged Rafael ‘Teddy’ Cruz’s constitutional eligibility or policies.

Here is what Scot Sheely posted and again after his own insults has banned another with an opposing viewpoint.

ScotSheelyBannedTGFD2Cropped

Scot Sheely’s actions are a violation as Tea Party Nation solicits donations and contributions.

Another example of Scot Sheely’s banning based upon a different opinion.

FranlWorthPost

 

Will Judson Phillips wake up or will the complaints and filings to the IRS and the potential loss of Tea Party Nation IRS standings force Scot Sheely to pay for his unethical actions? More filings are in the works and being documented.

10qvb0

Update

Candidates campaign’s notified of the unethicial conduct at Tea Party Nation and provided with additonal material including updated thread entries.

 

Tea Party Nation – the den of hypocrisy

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

TPNBanner3

Tea Party Nation moderator Scot Sheely has been named in the following IRS Complaint.

ScotSheelyIRSComplaintTop

a closeup of the ‘Details of Violation’ appear below.

ScotSheelyComplaintEnlarged

See the exchange below and note how Scot Sheely himself is in violation of what he accues others and that after being confronted ‘edited’ his own post. What a sicko.

I have filed the complaint and all material posted here and the previous post concerning TPN to the IRS.

As stated Scot Sheely is using TPN as a Political Action Committee and as the person who confronted Scot Sheely was correct in “Is it your intent to kick out everyone who disagrees with you?”

Nazi images? I understand it was an image of Cruz with a little mustache, right? I can’t see it now, Scot…

Was this in response to your many references to “Dump Drumpf”, and so on? Looks like you’ve now edited out most of your Drumpf comments,. But so, Donald Trump is to be condemned for his Grandfather’s surname? Or just ridiculed? Or are you simply showing a hatred for all Germans?

The name Drumpf sounds more Eastern European. Perhaps only Anglic names are acceptable. Not all supporters of Cruz have such phobias, right?

And so, the TPN member since 2011 who protested, who goes by the moniker nobarack, was thrown out for stating a protesting opinion? I realize that he supports a different candidate than you do. The more popular candidate, actually. Is it your intent to kick out everyone who disagrees with you?

Is it true that you also suspend members for their Moniker not matching their real name, and how do you pick which ones to kick out? Perhaps most members don’t use their real names here.

No, Vern. Calling out individual’s names IS a violation of the TOS, and that is exactly why it wasn’t done here in the forum. Should you care to further discuss this matter, we can do so via PM, e-mail or a simple and quick phone call. It’s your choice.

As for the the Nazi photograph, it was that of Hitler at a Nazi rally, with Ted Cruz’s face superimposed upon Hitler’s body. The caption read, “Another Neocon Globalist” and featured a gathering of Nazis in full Nazi regalia at the rally standing behind Hitler.

A second photo that was included in that same post was that of Glenn Beck and featured a caption that read, “Heir Gerbils Of The Cruz Propghanda Ministry” (sic). Both of those images were archived, as was their relative link locations here on TPN, and a screenshot of the actual post was also created to back up my extremely valid position of deleting that hate-filled Nazi rhetoric.

Prior to his ‘time out’, I also sent a concise PM to him explaining why what he had done was wrong and cited the exact portions of the TOS his post was in violation of. This was not his first warning, however, and that individual of whom you speak had been warned previously for other infractions not related to his posting of Nazi imagery.

If you have a question on an issue such as this, address it to me personally, Vern, rather than try to ‘call me out’ and embarrass me in the forum itself, because that simply does not work.

As to the removal of the ‘Drumpf’ content, as you put it, the only 2 things that were changed were the title of this thread and the main image of Donald Trump at the very top of this post. No other posts were harmed in the restoration of the original content that resided here.

The reason that I added the altered header and main graphic in the first place (which only changed the name ‘Trump’ to ‘Drumpf’) was for a bit of silliness and to attempt to inject a bit of humor into this thread. Obviously, while many enjoyed it and got a good laugh from that, a small minority of others feigned contempt at the joke because they simply didn’t ‘get it’. In lieu of keeping the peace for those handful of individuals (which could be counted on one hand), I elected to restore the photo and header to their originally posted state.

As stated previously, no other posts were deleted, altered nor harmed during this minor transition.

As for your last comment, the TOS clearly states that:

You agree that you will not post, email or make available any content or use this Network:

  • to impersonate any other person, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with any person or entity, or to obtain access to this Network without authorization;
  • in a manner that is misleading, deceptive or fraudulent or otherwise illegal or promotes illegal activities, including engaging in phishing or otherwise obtaining financial or other personal information in a misleading manner or for fraudulent or misleading purposes;
  • in a manner that employs misleading email or IP addresses, or forged headers or otherwise manipulated identifiers in order to disguise the origin of content transmitted through this Network or to users;

These are not rules that I created, they are that of this forum. We have in the past declined hundreds, possibly even thousands of potential memberships for those very reasons stated above.

You have personally done the very same thing on countless occasions. Most of the admins here have.

It is a normal and expected procedure to weed out potential problems before they occur.

If you wish to call me to further discuss this or any other matter, PM me and I will send you my phone number, since it has changed since we last spoke. Have a good weekend, talk with you again soon.

You apparently found your Drumpf references and intimation of Nazi tactics humorous, Scot.

But Cruz with a little mustache and his buddy Beck in jackboots was abhorrent to you! Hardly an example of equanimity to throw the guy out.

It is an effective way to silence opposition speech, I suppose. Akin to the protesters shutting down the Trump event last night eh?

While I see no humor in attacking one’s name, Cruz with a little mustache is kind of a cute idea.

Gimme a call sometime. Preferably before you throw anyone else out for opposing your personal favorite.

 

As I have documented in my previous post, here are blantant examples of items that Scot Sheely saying are not permitted, but are there, cause they meet with his agenda.

TPNImages

Again, showing Scot’s hypocrisy.

We’ll see how Tea Party Nation likes an IRS complaint due to Scot Sheely’s violations.

I will also be forwarding copies to the following.

Tea Party Nation Corporation
c/o Judson Phillips
101 Dogwood Lane
Franklin, Tennessee 37064 USA

 

Tea Party Nation – the den of hypocrisy

Scot Sheely named in IRS Complaint against Tea Party Nation

Scot Sheely named in second IRS complaint

Scot Sheely attempts to cover up